Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
27501

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Henry Cotton's Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Proceedings for the revocation of decisions or for the cancellation of entries – Cancellation of an entry in the register which contains an obvious error attributable to EUIPO – Trade marks involved in insolvency proceedings – Registration of the transfers of the marks – Effects vis-à-vis third parties of bankruptcy or similar proceedings – Competence of EUIPO – Duty of diligence – Articles 20, 24, 27 and 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Articles 3, 7 and 19 of Regulation (EU) 2015/848.#Case T-173/20.

cjeu_case ·
27502

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Marina Yachting Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Proceedings for the revocation of decisions or for the cancellation of entries – Cancellation of an entry in the register which contains an obvious error attributable to EUIPO – Trade mark involved in insolvency proceedings – Registration of the transfer of the mark – Effects vis-à-vis third parties of bankruptcy or similar proceedings – Competence of EUIPO – Duty of diligence – Articles 20, 24, 27 and 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Articles 3, 7 and 19 of Regulation (EU) 2015/848.#Case T-169/20.

cjeu_case ·
27503

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Marina Yachting Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Proceedings for the revocation of decisions or for the cancellation of entries – Cancellation of an entry in the register which contains an obvious error attributable to EUIPO – Trade mark involved in insolvency proceedings – Registration of the transfer of the mark – Effects vis-à-vis third parties of bankruptcy or similar proceedings – Competence of EUIPO – Duty of diligence – Articles 20, 24, 27 and 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Articles 3, 7 and 19 of Regulation (EU) 2015/848.#Case T-169/20.

cjeu_case ·
27504

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 September 2021 (Extracts).#Collibra v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Applications for the EU word mark COLLIBRA and figurative mark collibra – Earlier national word mark Kolibri – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Cases T-128/20 and T-129/20.

cjeu_case ·
27505

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 September 2021 (Extracts).#Collibra v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Applications for the EU word mark COLLIBRA and figurative mark collibra – Earlier national word mark Kolibri – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Cases T-128/20 and T-129/20.

cjeu_case ·
27509

Case T-503/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — T i D kontrolni sistemi v EUIPO –Sigmatron (Signalling apparatuses and devices) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing signalling apparatuses and devices — Earlier Community design — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Declaration of invalidity of a prior design — No effect — Disclosure of the earlier design — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — No different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

cjeu_case ·
27511

Case T-250/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — Moviescreens Rental v EUIPO — the airscreen company (AIRSCREEN) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark airscreen — Absolute grounds for refusal — No descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
27514

Case T-173/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — Henry Cotton’s Brand Management v EUIPO — Industries Sportswear (Henry Cotton’s) (EU trade mark — Proceedings for the revocation of decisions or for the cancellation of entries — Cancellation of an entry in the register which contains an obvious error attributable to EUIPO — Trade marks involved in insolvency proceedings — Registration of the transfers of the marks — Effects vis-à-vis third parties of bankruptcy or similar proceedings — Competence of EUIPO — Duty of diligence — Articles 20, 24, 27 and 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Articles 3, 7 and 19 of Regulation (EU) 2015/848)

cjeu_case ·
27515

Case T-169/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — Marina Yachting Brand Management v EUIPO — Industries Sportswear (MARINA YACHTING) (EU trade mark — Proceedings for the revocation of decisions or for the cancellation of entries — Cancellation of an entry in the register which contains an obvious error attributable to EUIPO — Trade mark involved in insolvency proceedings — Registration of the transfer of the mark — Effects vis-à-vis third parties of bankruptcy or similar proceedings — Competence of EUIPO — Duty of diligence — Articles 20, 24, 27 and 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Articles 3, 7 and 19 of Regulation (EU) 2015/848)

cjeu_case ·
27516

Case T-128/20 and T-129/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — Collibra v EUIPO — Dietrich (COLLIBRA and collibra) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Applications for the EU word mark COLLIBRA and figurative mark collibra — Earlier national word mark Kolibri — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
27517

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Healios KK v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Healios – Earlier EU word mark HELIOS – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article (8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-591/19.

cjeu_case ·
27518

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Healios KK v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Healios – Earlier EU word mark HELIOS – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article (8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-591/19.

cjeu_case ·
27519

Case T-591/19: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — Healios v EUIPO — Helios Kliniken (Healios) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Healios — Earlier EU word mark HELIOS — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article (8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
27520

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Altice Europe NV v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Telecommunications sector – Decision imposing fines for putting into effect a concentration before it has been notified and authorised – Article 4(1), Article 7(1) and Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Principle of legality – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Gravity of the infringements – Implementation of the infringements – Exchange of information – Amount of fines – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-425/18.

cjeu_case ·