Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
27112

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Power Horse Energy Drinks GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark UNSTOPPABLE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-3/21.

cjeu_case ·
27113

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Power Horse Energy Drinks GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark UNSTOPPABLE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-3/21.

cjeu_case ·
27115

Case T-3/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Power Horse Energy Drinks v EUIPO — Robot Energy Europe (UNSTOPPABLE) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark UNSTOPPABLE — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Lack of descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
27116

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 October 2021.#FCA Italy SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170a of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-360/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
27117

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 October 2021.#FCA Italy SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170a of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-360/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
27118

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Monument Vandekerckhove NV v Stad Gent.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 2014/24/EU – Conduct of the procedure – Choice of participants and award of contracts – Article 63 – Tenderer relying on the capacities of another entity in order to meet the requirements of the contracting authority – Failure to meet the requirements relating to the technical and professional ability of the tenderer by the entity on whose capacities the tenderer intends to rely – Obligation to allow that tenderer to replace that entity – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-316/21.

cjeu_case ·
27119

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Monument Vandekerckhove NV v Stad Gent.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 2014/24/EU – Conduct of the procedure – Choice of participants and award of contracts – Article 63 – Tenderer relying on the capacities of another entity in order to meet the requirements of the contracting authority – Failure to meet the requirements relating to the technical and professional ability of the tenderer by the entity on whose capacities the tenderer intends to rely – Obligation to allow that tenderer to replace that entity – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-316/21.

cjeu_case ·
27120

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#FI and RE v TUIfly GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5 – Article 7 – Article 8(3) – Denied boarding, cancellation or long delay of a flight – Compensation and assistance to passengers – Concept of ‘cancellation’ – Diversion of a flight to an airport not serving the same town, city or region as that for which the booking was made – Re-routing of passengers by coach.#Case C-253/21.

cjeu_case ·