Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
26601

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#VF International Sagl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC – Earlier non-registered mark geographic – Relative ground for refusal – Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-517/20.

cjeu_case ·
26602

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#VF International Sagl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC – Earlier non-registered mark geographic – Relative ground for refusal – Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-517/20.

cjeu_case ·
26605

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 November 2021 (Extracts).#Sanford LP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a label – Earlier design – Proof of disclosure – Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Evidence submitted after the expiry of the prescribed time limit – Board of Appeal’s discretion – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-443/20.

cjeu_case ·
26606

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 November 2021 (Extracts).#Sanford LP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a label – Earlier design – Proof of disclosure – Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Evidence submitted after the expiry of the prescribed time limit – Board of Appeal’s discretion – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-443/20.

cjeu_case ·
26607

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#Associazione Calcio Milan SpA (AC Milan) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ACM 1899 AC MILAN – Earlier national word marks Milan – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – No alteration of distinctive character.#Case T-353/20.

cjeu_case ·
26608

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#Associazione Calcio Milan SpA (AC Milan) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ACM 1899 AC MILAN – Earlier national word marks Milan – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – No alteration of distinctive character.#Case T-353/20.

cjeu_case ·
26615

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#Eternit v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a building panel – Earlier design representing a panel for a noise-reduction wall – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Sector concerned – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression – Relevance of goods actually marketed – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-193/20.

cjeu_case ·
26616

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#Eternit v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a building panel – Earlier design representing a panel for a noise-reduction wall – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Sector concerned – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression – Relevance of goods actually marketed – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-193/20.

cjeu_case ·
26617

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#Danilo Di Bernardo v European Commission.#Civil Service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition – Conditions of admission – Non-inclusion on the reserve list – Insufficient professional experience – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to give effect to a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to give effect to a judgment delivered in an action for annulment – Article 2 of Annex III to the Statute – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-41/20.

cjeu_case ·
26618

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#Danilo Di Bernardo v European Commission.#Civil Service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition – Conditions of admission – Non-inclusion on the reserve list – Insufficient professional experience – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to give effect to a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to give effect to a judgment delivered in an action for annulment – Article 2 of Annex III to the Statute – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-41/20.

cjeu_case ·
26620

Joined Cases T-758/20 and T-759/20: Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2021 — Monster Energy v EUIPO — Frito-Lay Trading Company (MONSTER and MONSTER ENERGY) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word marks MONSTER and MONSTER ENERGY — Genuine use of the marks — Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the marks were registered — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·