Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
26441

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#Fereydoun Mahmoudian v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran – Damage allegedly suffered by the appellant as a result of his name being included and maintained on the list of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Action for damages – Jurisdiction of the Court to rule on a claim seeking compensation for the damage allegedly caused by restrictive measures taken in decisions adopted pursuant to the CFSP – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case C-681/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
26442

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#Fulmen v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran – Damage allegedly suffered by the appellant as a result of its name being included and maintained on the list of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Action for damages – Jurisdiction of the Court to rule on a claim seeking compensation for the damage allegedly caused by restrictive measures taken in decisions adopted pursuant to the CFSP – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case C-680/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
26443

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 November 2021.#Fulmen v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran – Damage allegedly suffered by the appellant as a result of its name being included and maintained on the list of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Action for damages – Jurisdiction of the Court to rule on a claim seeking compensation for the damage allegedly caused by restrictive measures taken in decisions adopted pursuant to the CFSP – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case C-680/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
26444

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 18 November 2021.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SpaceNet AG and Telekom Deutschland GmbH.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Confidentiality of communications – Providers of electronic communications services – General and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 6, 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) – Article 4(2) TEU.#Joined Cases C-793/19 and C-794/19.

cjeu_case ·
26445

Case C-681/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 November 2021 — Fereydoun Mahmoudian v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran — Damage allegedly suffered by the appellant as a result of his name being included and maintained on the list of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Action for damages — Jurisdiction of the Court to rule on a claim seeking compensation for the damage allegedly caused by restrictive measures taken in decisions adopted pursuant to the CFSP — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals)

cjeu_case ·
26446

Case C-680/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 November 2021 — Fulmen v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran — Damage allegedly suffered by the appellant as a result of its name being included and maintained on the list of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Action for damages — Jurisdiction of the Court to rule on a claim seeking compensation for the damage allegedly caused by restrictive measures taken in decisions adopted pursuant to the CFSP — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals)

cjeu_case ·
26449

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#YB v Unión de Créditos Inmobiliarios SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 53 and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan agreement – Variable interest rate – Mortgage loan reference index (IRPH) – Review of transparency by the national court – Duty to provide information – Assessment of the unfair nature of contractual terms – Requirements of good faith, balance and transparency – Consequences of a declaration of nullity.#Case C-79/21.

cjeu_case ·
26450

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#YB v Unión de Créditos Inmobiliarios SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Ibiza.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 53 and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan agreement – Variable interest rate – Mortgage loan reference index (IRPH) – Review of transparency by the national court – Duty to provide information – Assessment of the unfair nature of contractual terms – Requirements of good faith, balance and transparency – Consequences of a declaration of nullity.#Case C-79/21.

cjeu_case ·
26454

Case C-79/21: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 2 de Ibiza — Spain) — YB v Unión de Créditos Inmobiliarios SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 53 and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Mortgage loan agreement — Variable interest rate — Mortgage loan reference index (IRPH) — Review of transparency by the national court — Duty to provide information — Assessment of the unfair nature of contractual terms — Requirements of good faith, balance and transparency — Consequences of a declaration of nullity)

cjeu_case ·
26455

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Philip Jakober v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a cup – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-658/20.

cjeu_case ·
26456

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Philip Jakober v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a cup – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-658/20.

cjeu_case ·
26457

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect – Earlier EU word mark ONE – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Res judicata.#Case T-616/20.

cjeu_case ·
26458

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect – Earlier EU word mark ONE – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Res judicata.#Case T-616/20.

cjeu_case ·
26459

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Marcos Guasch Pubill v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing table linen – Disclosure of earlier design – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Inadmissibility of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Article 52(3) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-538/20.

cjeu_case ·
26460

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Marcos Guasch Pubill v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing table linen – Disclosure of earlier design – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Inadmissibility of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Article 52(3) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-538/20.

cjeu_case ·