26321Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 25 novembre 2021.#Delfarma Sp. z o.o. contre Prezes Urzędu Rejestracji Produktów Leczniczych, Wyrobów Medycznych i Produktów Biobójczych.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Articles 34 et 36 TFUE – Libre circulation des marchandises – Mesure d’effet équivalent à une restriction quantitative – Médicaments à usage humain – Importation parallèle de médicaments – Réglementation d’un État membre prévoyant l’expiration de plein droit de l’autorisation d’importation parallèle un an après l’expiration de l’autorisation de mise sur le marché du médicament de référence – Protection de la santé et de la vie des personnes – Proportionnalité – Directive 2001/83/CE – Pharmacovigilance.#Affaire C-488/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26322Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2021.#Delfarma Sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Rejestracji Produktów Leczniczych, Wyrobów Medycznych i Produktów Biobójczych.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 34 and 36 TFUE – Free movement of goods – Measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction – Medicinal products for human use – Parallel import of medicinal products – Legislation of a Member State under which a parallel import licence is to expire automatically after one year from the expiry of the marketing authorisation for the reference medicinal product – Protection of the health and life of humans – Proportionality – Directive 2001/83/EC – Pharmacovigilance.#Case C-488/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26323Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 November 2021.#QY v Finanzamt Österreich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 45 and 48 TFEU – Free movement of workers – Equal treatment – Family benefits provided to development aid workers who take their family members to the third country to which they have been posted – Withdrawal – Second paragraph of Article 288 TFEU – Legal acts of the Union – Application of regulations – National legislation the scope ratione personae of which is broader than that of a regulation – Conditions – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 11(3)(a) and (e) – Scope – Employed person who is a national of one Member State, employed as development aid worker by an employer established in another Member State and posted to a third country – Article 68(3) – Right of an applicant for family benefits to lodge a single application with the institution of the Member State having primary competence or with the institution of the Member State having secondary competence.#Case C-372/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26324Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 November 2021.#QY v Finanzamt Österreich.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 45 and 48 TFEU – Free movement of workers – Equal treatment – Family benefits provided to development aid workers who take their family members to the third country to which they have been posted – Withdrawal – Second paragraph of Article 288 TFEU – Legal acts of the Union – Application of regulations – National legislation the scope ratione personae of which is broader than that of a regulation – Conditions – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 11(3)(a) and (e) – Scope – Employed person who is a national of one Member State, employed as development aid worker by an employer established in another Member State and posted to a third country – Article 68(3) – Right of an applicant for family benefits to lodge a single application with the institution of the Member State having primary competence or with the institution of the Member State having secondary competence.#Case C-372/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26325Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 November 2021.#Amper Metal Kft v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2 – Transaction subject to VAT – Concept – Article 168(a), and Article 176 – Right to deduct input VAT – Refusal – Advertising services categorised as excessively expensive and not beneficial by the tax authority – Lack of turnover generated by the taxable person.#Case C-334/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26326Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 November 2021.#Amper Metal Kft v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Veszprémi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2 – Transaction subject to VAT – Concept – Article 168(a), and Article 176 – Right to deduct input VAT – Refusal – Advertising services categorised as excessively expensive and not beneficial by the tax authority – Lack of turnover generated by the taxable person.#Case C-334/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26327Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2021.#IB v FA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Jurisdiction to hear divorce applications – Article 3(1)(a) – ‘Habitual residence’ of an applicant.#Case C-289/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26328Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2021.#IB v FA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Jurisdiction to hear divorce applications – Article 3(1)(a) – ‘Habitual residence’ of an applicant.#Case C-289/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26329Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2021.#Aurubis AG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading – Scheme for the free allocation of allowances – Decision 2011/278/EU – Article 3(d) – Fuel benchmark sub-installation – Concepts of ‘combustion’ and ‘fuel’ – Primary copper production by flash smelting – Request for allocation – Allowances requested and not yet allocated on the date of expiry of a trading period – Possibility of issuing such allowances during the subsequent trading period by way of enforcement of a judicial decision given after that date.#Case C-271/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26330Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2021.#Aurubis AG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading – Scheme for the free allocation of allowances – Decision 2011/278/EU – Article 3(d) – Fuel benchmark sub-installation – Concepts of ‘combustion’ and ‘fuel’ – Primary copper production by flash smelting – Request for allocation – Allowances requested and not yet allocated on the date of expiry of a trading period – Possibility of issuing such allowances during the subsequent trading period by way of enforcement of a judicial decision given after that date.#Case C-271/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26331Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 November 2021.#European Commission v UG.#Appeal – Civil service – Contract staff – Contract of indefinite duration – Termination – Grounds for termination – Distortion – Non-material damage – Admissibility – Failure to rule on a head of claim.#Case C-249/20 P.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26332Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 November 2021.#European Commission v UG.#Appeal – Civil service – Contract staff – Contract of indefinite duration – Termination – Grounds for termination – Distortion – Non-material damage – Admissibility – Failure to rule on a head of claim.#Case C-249/20 P.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26333Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 25 novembre 2021.#WD contre job-medium GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 2003/88/CE – Protection de la sécurité et de la santé des travailleurs – Article 7, paragraphe 1 – Droit à une indemnité financière pour congé annuel payé non pris avant la fin de la relation de travail – Cessation prématurée de la relation de travail du fait de l’employé.#Affaire C-233/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26334Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 November 2021.#WD v job-medium GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Article 7(1) – Right to an allowance in lieu of paid annual leave not taken before the end of the employment relationship – Early termination of the employment relationship by the employee.#Case C-233/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26335Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 25 novembre 2021.#StWL Städtische Werke Lauf a.d. Pegnitz GmbH contre eprimo GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 2002/58/CE – Traitement des données à caractère personnel et protection de la vie privée dans le secteur des communications électroniques – Article 2, second alinéa, sous h) – Notion de “courrier électronique” – Article 13, paragraphe 1 – Notion d’“utilisation de courrier électronique à des fins de prospection directe” – Directive 2005/29/CE – Pratiques commerciales déloyales – Annexe I, point 26 – Notion de “sollicitations répétées et non souhaitées par courrier électronique” – Messages publicitaires – Inbox advertising.#Affaire C-102/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26336Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2021.#StWL Städtische Werke Lauf a.d. Pegnitz GmbH v eprimo GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2002/58/EC – Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector – Article 2(h) – Concept of ‘electronic mail’ – Article 13(1) – Concept of ‘use of … electronic mail for the purposes of direct marketing’ – Directive 2005/29/EC – Unfair commercial practices – Annex I, point 26 – Concept of ‘persistent and unwanted solicitations by email’ – Advertising messages – Inbox advertising.#Case C-102/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26337Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 25 novembre 2021.#Procédure engagée par NK.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Procédures d’insolvabilité – Règlement (CE) no 1346/2000 – Articles 4 et 28 – Article 32, paragraphe 2 – Délai imparti pour la production de créances dans une procédure d’insolvabilité – Production, dans une procédure d’insolvabilité secondaire en cours dans un État membre, de créances par le syndic de la procédure principale en cours dans un autre État membre – Délai de rigueur prévu par le droit de l’État d’ouverture de la procédure d’insolvabilité secondaire.#Affaire C-25/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26338Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 November 2021.#Proceedings brought by NK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Višje sodišče v Ljubljani.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Insolvency proceedings – Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 – Articles 4 and 28 – Article 32(2) – Time limit for the lodging of claims in insolvency proceedings – Lodging, in secondary insolvency proceedings ongoing in a Member State, of claims by the liquidator in the main proceedings pending in another Member State – Compulsory time limit laid down by the law of the State in which secondary insolvency proceedings have been opened.#Case C-25/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26339Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 25 November 2021.#Proceedings brought by K.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Directive 2008/115/CE – Detention for the purpose of removal – Article 16(1) – Direct effect – Specialised detention facility – Concept – Detention in prison accommodation – Conditions – Article 18 – Emergency situation – Concept – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial review.#Case C-519/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021
26340Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 25 November 2021.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Council decision, contained in the act of the Permanent Representatives Committee (Coreper) of 5 February 2020, endorsing the submission to the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) concerning the introduction of life cycle guidelines to estimate well-to-tank greenhouse gas emissions of sustainable alternative fuels – Article 17(1) TEU – External representation of the European Union – Transmission of that submission to the IMO by the Member State holding the Presidency of the Council, on behalf of the Member States and the Commission.#Case C-161/20.cjeu_case · 25 novembre 2021