26041Case C-151/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha — Spain) — Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM) v BF (Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 4 — Principle of non-discrimination — Field of public health — Calculation of length-of-service increments — National legislation refusing to take into account, as regards permanent staff regulated under administrative law, for the purpose of calculating length-of-service increments, periods corresponding to activities temporarily exercised in a higher professional category)cjeu_case · 13 décembre 2021
26042Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021.#XG v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Direct taxation – Taxation of capital gains on immovable property – Articles 63, 64 and 65 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Higher tax liability on capital gains on immovable property made by residents of third countries.#Case C-647/20.cjeu_case · 13 décembre 2021
26043Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021.#XG v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa - CAAD).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Direct taxation – Taxation of capital gains on immovable property – Articles 63, 64 and 65 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Higher tax liability on capital gains on immovable property made by residents of third countries.#Case C-647/20.cjeu_case · 13 décembre 2021
26044Case C-647/20: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — XG v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Direct taxation — Taxation of capital gains on immovable property — Articles 63, 64 and 65 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Higher tax liability on capital gains on immovable property made by residents of third countries)cjeu_case · 13 décembre 2021
26045Case T-771/21: Action brought on 11 December 2021 — Bategu Gummitechnologie v Commissioncjeu_case · 11 décembre 2021
26046Order of the President of the General Court of 10 December 2021.#ANIEF Associazione Professionale e Sindacale v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Case T-679/21 R.cjeu_case · 10 décembre 2021
26047Order of the President of the General Court of 10 December 2021.#Alessandro Meluzzi v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Case T-655/21 R.cjeu_case · 10 décembre 2021
26048Case T-769/21: Action brought on 10 December 2021 — Euranimi v Commissioncjeu_case · 10 décembre 2021
26049Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 10 December 2021.#Rezon OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-476/21 P.cjeu_case · 10 décembre 2021
26050Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 10 December 2021.#Rezon OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-476/21 P.cjeu_case · 10 décembre 2021
26051Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 10 December 2021.#European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-382/21 P.cjeu_case · 10 décembre 2021
26052Case C-774/21 P: Appeal brought on 10 December 2021 by NB against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 28 September 2021 in Case T-648/20, NB v Court of Justice of the European Unioncjeu_case · 10 décembre 2021
26053Case C-764/21 P: Appeal brought on 10 December 2021 by TUIfly GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 29 September 2021 in Case T-619/18 TUIfly GmbH v European Commissioncjeu_case · 10 décembre 2021
26054Case C-763/21 P: Appeal brought on 10 December 2021 by TUIfly GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 29 September 2021 in Case T-447/18, TUIfly GmbH v European Commissioncjeu_case · 10 décembre 2021
26055Case C-762/21 P: Appeal brought on 10 December 2021 by St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 20 October 2021 in Case T-352/20, St. Hippolyt v EUIPO — Elephantcjeu_case · 10 décembre 2021
26056Case C-761/21 P: Appeal brought on 10 December 2021 by St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 20 October 2021 in Case T-351/20, St. Hippolyt v EUIPO — Raisioaquacjeu_case · 10 décembre 2021
26057Case C-760/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 10 December 2021 — Kwizda Pharma GmbHcjeu_case · 10 décembre 2021
26058Case C-759/21 P: Appeal brought on 10 December 2021 by Nippon Chemi-Con Corporation against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 29 September 2021 in Case T-363/18, Nippon Chemi-Con Corporation v Commissioncjeu_case · 10 décembre 2021
26059Ordonnance de rectification du 10 décembre 2021.#T.B. et D. sp. z. o. o. contre G. I. A/S.#Rectification d’arrêt.#Affaire C-393/20.cjeu_case · 10 décembre 2021