25881Case C-803/21 P: Appeal brought on 17 December 2021 by Versobank AS against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 6 October 2021 in Joined Cases T-351/18 and T-584/18, Ukrselhosprom PCF and Versobank v ECBcjeu_case · 17 décembre 2021
25882Case C-801/21 P: Appeal brought on 17 December 2021 by the European Union Intellectual Property Office against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 6 October 2021 in Case T-342/20, Indo European Foods v EUIPOcjeu_case · 17 décembre 2021
25883Case C-800/21 P: Appeal brought on 17 December 2021 by Infineon Technologies AG and Infineon Technologies Dresden GmbH & Co. KG against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 6 October 2021 in Joined Cases T-233/19 and T-234/19, Infineon Technologies Dresden GmbH & Co. KG and Infineon Technologies AG v European Commissioncjeu_case · 17 décembre 2021
25884Case C-788/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Retten i Esbjerg (Denmark) lodged on 17 December 2021 — Skatteministeriet Departementet v Global Gravity ApScjeu_case · 17 décembre 2021
25885Order of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 December 2021.#Georgios Legakis and Others v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Euro Group Statements of 16 and 25 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – Statement of the President of the Euro Group of 21 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – Mistaken designation of the defendant – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-765/14.cjeu_case · 17 décembre 2021
25886Order of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 December 2021.#Georgios Legakis and Others v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Euro Group Statements of 16 and 25 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – Statement of the President of the Euro Group of 21 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – Mistaken designation of the defendant – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-765/14.cjeu_case · 17 décembre 2021
25887Order of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 December 2021.#Berry Investments, Inc. v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Euro Group Statements of 16 and 25 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – President of the Euro Group Statement of 21 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – Mistaken designation of the defendant – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-496/14.cjeu_case · 17 décembre 2021
25888Order of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 December 2021.#Berry Investments, Inc. v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Euro Group Statements of 16 and 25 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – President of the Euro Group Statement of 21 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – Mistaken designation of the defendant – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-496/14.cjeu_case · 17 décembre 2021
25889Order of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 December 2021.#Georgios Theodorakis and Maria Theodoraki v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Euro Group Statements of 16 and 25 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – Statement of the President of the Euro Group of 21 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – Mistaken designation of the defendant – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-495/14.cjeu_case · 17 décembre 2021
25890Order of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 December 2021.#Georgios Theodorakis and Maria Theodoraki v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Euro Group Statements of 16 and 25 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – Statement of the President of the Euro Group of 21 March 2013 concerning Cyprus – Mistaken designation of the defendant – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-495/14.cjeu_case · 17 décembre 2021
25891Case T-765/14: Order of the General Court of 17 December 2021 — Legakis and Others v Council (Non-contractual liability — Economic and monetary policy — Stability support programme for the Republic of Cyprus — Statements of the Euro Group of 16 and 25 March 2013 concerning Cyprus — Statement of the President of the Euro Group of 21 March 2013 concerning Cyprus — Incorrect identification of the defendant — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 17 décembre 2021
25892Case T-496/14: Order of the General Court of 17 December 2021 — Berry Investments v Council (Non-contractual liability — Economic and monetary policy — Stability support programme for the Republic of Cyprus — Statements of the Euro Group of 16 and 25 March 2013 concerning Cyprus — Statement of the President of the Euro Group of 21 March 2013 concerning Cyprus — Incorrect identification of the defendant — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 17 décembre 2021
25893Case T-495/14: Order of the General Court of 17 December 2021 — Theodorakis and Theodoraki v Council (Non-contractual liability — Economic and monetary policy — Stability support programme for the Republic of Cyprus — Statements of the Euro Group of 16 and 25 March 2013 concerning Cyprus — Statement of the President of the Euro Group of 21 March 2013 concerning Cyprus — Incorrect identification of the defendant — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 17 décembre 2021
25894Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 16 December 2021.#Innovative Cosmetic Concepts LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-523/21 P.cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2021
25895Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 16 December 2021.#Innovative Cosmetic Concepts LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-523/21 P.cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2021
25896Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2021
25897Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#FU v Agence fédérale pour l'Accueil des demandeurs d'asile (Fedasil).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) – Article 27 – Remedies against a transfer decision – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-505/21.cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2021
25898Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#Comune di Venezia v Telecom Italia SpA and Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane SpA - Inwit SpA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Approximation of laws – Electronic communications networks and services – Restrictions on the installation of mobile telephone relay antennas imposed by the local authorities – Insufficient information concerning the reasons justifying the need to reply to the question referred for the purpose of resolving the dispute in the main proceedings – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-467/21.cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2021
25899Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#Comune di Venezia v Telecom Italia SpA and Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane SpA - Inwit SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Approximation of laws – Electronic communications networks and services – Restrictions on the installation of mobile telephone relay antennas imposed by the local authorities – Insufficient information concerning the reasons justifying the need to reply to the question referred for the purpose of resolving the dispute in the main proceedings – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-467/21.cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2021
25900Case C-799/21 P: Appeal brought on 16 December 2021 by the Council of the European Union against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 29 September 2021 in Case T-279/19, Front Polisario v Councilcjeu_case · 16 décembre 2021