25501Case T-483/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 January 2022 — Tecnica Group v EUIPO — Zeitneu (Shape of a boot) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU three-dimensional mark — Shape of a boot — Declaration of partial invalidity — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Decisions of EU trade mark courts ruling on an action for a declaration of non-infringement — Res judicata)cjeu_case · 19 janvier 2022
25502Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 January 2022.#Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Slovak market for broadband telecommunications services – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and of Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Judgment annulling the decision in part and reducing the amount of the fine imposed – Refusal of the Commission to pay default interest – Article 266 TFEU – Article 90(4)(a) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Loss of use of the amount of the fine that had been unduly paid – Loss of profits – Default interest – Rate – Harm.#Case T-610/19.cjeu_case · 19 janvier 2022
25503Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 January 2022.#Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Slovak market for broadband telecommunications services – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and of Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Judgment annulling the decision in part and reducing the amount of the fine imposed – Refusal of the Commission to pay default interest – Article 266 TFEU – Article 90(4)(a) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Loss of use of the amount of the fine that had been unduly paid – Loss of profits – Default interest – Rate – Harm.#Case T-610/19.cjeu_case · 19 janvier 2022
25504Case T-610/19: Judgment of the General Court of 19 January 2022 — Deutsche Telekom v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Slovak market for broadband telecommunications services — Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement — Judgment annulling the decision in part and reducing the amount of the fine imposed — Refusal of the Commission to pay default interest — Article 266 TFEU — Article 90(4)(a) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012) — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Loss of use of the amount of the fine that had been unduly paid — Loss of profits — Default interest — Rates — Harm)cjeu_case · 19 janvier 2022
25505Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA - Loutraki AE - Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE v European Commission.#State aid – Greek casinos – System providing for a levy of 80% on admission fees of different amounts – Differentiation between public and private casinos – Complaint – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery – Annulment of the decision by a decision of the General Court – Decision finding no State aid – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Admissibility – Rights of the defence.#Case T-757/18.cjeu_case · 19 janvier 2022
25506Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA - Loutraki AE - Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE v European Commission.#State aid – Greek casinos – System providing for a levy of 80% on admission fees of different amounts – Differentiation between public and private casinos – Complaint – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery – Annulment of the decision by a decision of the General Court – Decision finding no State aid – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Admissibility – Rights of the defence.#Case T-757/18.cjeu_case · 19 janvier 2022
25507Case T-757/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 January 2022 — Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou v Commission (State aid — Greek casinos — System providing for a levy of 80 % on admission fees of different amounts — Differentiation between public and private casinos — Complaint — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery — Annulment of the decision by a decision of the General Court — Decision finding no State aid — Action for annulment — Challengeable act — Admissibility — Rights of the defence)cjeu_case · 19 janvier 2022
25508Case T-30/22: Action brought on 18 January 2022 — Sanoptis v EUIPO — Synoptis Pharma (SANOPTIS)cjeu_case · 18 janvier 2022
25510Case T-27/22: Action brought on 18 January 2022 — Innovaciones Cosmético Farmacéuticas v EUIPO — Benito Oliver (th pharma)cjeu_case · 18 janvier 2022
25511Case C-43/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 18 January 2022 — Prokurator Generalnycjeu_case · 18 janvier 2022
25512Case C-41/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Erfurt (Germany) lodged on 18 January 2022 — XXX v Helvetia schweizerische Lebensversicherungs-AGcjeu_case · 18 janvier 2022
25513Case C-40/22 P: Appeal brought on 18 January 2022 by Ramón Baides Fernández and Others against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 24 November 2021 in Case T-659/21, Baides Fernández v Commissioncjeu_case · 18 janvier 2022
25514Case C-39/22 P: Appeal brought on 18 January 2022 by Enol Velasco Granda and Others against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 24 November 2021 in Case T-658/21, Velasco Granda and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 18 janvier 2022
25515Case C-38/22 P: Appeal brought on 18 January 2022 by José Antonio Santos Cañibano and Others against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 24 November 2021 in Case T-649/21, Santos Cañibano and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 18 janvier 2022
25517Case C-386/21: Order of the President of the Court of 18 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Mons — Belgium) — Ryanair DAC v Happy Flights Srl, formerly Happy Flights Sprlcjeu_case · 18 janvier 2022
25518Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 January 2022.#Hungary v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Action for annulment – EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from EU financing – Expenditure incurred by Hungary.#Case C-185/20 P.cjeu_case · 18 janvier 2022
25519Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 January 2022.#Hungary v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Action for annulment – EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from EU financing – Expenditure incurred by Hungary.#Case C-185/20 P.cjeu_case · 18 janvier 2022
25520Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 January 2022.#Thelen Technopark Berlin GmbH v MN.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Article 49 TFEU – Directive 2006/123/EC – Article 15 – Architects’ and engineers’ fees – Fixed minimum tariffs – Direct effect – Judgment establishing a failure to fulfil obligations delivered during proceedings before a national court or tribunal.#Case C-261/20.cjeu_case · 18 janvier 2022