25301Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Novelis Deutschland GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a grill dish – Earlier national design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-173/21.cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25302Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Maternus GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark WILD – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-116/21.cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25303Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Maternus GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark WILD – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-116/21.cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25304Case T-202/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — Vita Zahnfabrik v EUIPO — VIPI Produtos Odontológicos (VITABLOCS TriLuxe forte) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark VITABLOCS TriLuxe forte — Earlier EU word mark TRILUX — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25305Case T-173/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — Novelis Deutschland v EUIPO — CU.CO. (grill dish) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a grill dish — Earlier national design — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25306Case T-116/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — Maternus v EUIPO — adp Gauselmann (WILD) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark WILD — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25307Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Maria Alexandra Canisius v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CCLABELLE VIENNA – Earlier EU word mark LABELLO – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-694/20.cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25308Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Maria Alexandra Canisius v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CCLABELLE VIENNA – Earlier EU word mark LABELLO – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-694/20.cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25309Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#LU v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Dignity at Work Policy – Psychological harassment – Investigation procedure – Action for annulment – Final report of the investigation panel – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility – Decision rejecting the complaint – Act adversely affecting an official – Admissibility – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Liability.#Case T-536/20.cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25310Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#LU v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Dignity at Work Policy – Psychological harassment – Investigation procedure – Action for annulment – Final report of the investigation panel – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility – Decision rejecting the complaint – Act adversely affecting an official – Admissibility – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Liability.#Case T-536/20.cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25311Case T-694/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — Canisius v EUIPO — Beiersdorf (CCLABELLE VIENNA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark CCLABELLE VIENNA — Earlier EU word mark LABELLO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25312Case T-536/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — LU v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Dignity at Work Policy — Psychological harassment — Investigation procedure — Action for annulment — Final report of the investigation panel — Preparatory act — Inadmissibility — Decision rejecting the complaint — Act adversely affecting an official — Admissibility — Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Liability)cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25313Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 February 2022.#Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Gas markets of central and eastern Europe – Decision rejecting a complaint – No EU interest – State action defence – Obligation to conduct a diligent examination – Procedural rights under Regulation (EC) No 773/2004.#Case T-399/19.cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25314Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 February 2022.#Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Gas markets of central and eastern Europe – Decision rejecting a complaint – No EU interest – State action defence – Obligation to conduct a diligent examination – Procedural rights under Regulation (EC) No 773/2004.#Case T-399/19.cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25315Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 February 2022.#Pilatus Bank plc and Pilatus Holding ltd. v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Indictment of the main shareholder in a third country – Criterion of good repute – Perception of good repute by the market – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Rights of the defence.#Case T-27/19.cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25316Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 February 2022.#Pilatus Bank plc and Pilatus Holding ltd. v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Indictment of the main shareholder in a third country – Criterion of good repute – Perception of good repute by the market – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Rights of the defence.#Case T-27/19.cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25317Case T-399/19: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo v Commission (Rejection of a complaint) (Competition — Abuse of a dominant position — Gas markets of central and eastern Europe — Decision rejecting a complaint — No EU interest — State action defence — Obligation to conduct a diligent examination — Procedural rights under Regulation (EC) No 773/2004)cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25318Case T-27/19: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — Pilatus Bank and Pilatus Holding v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB — Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation — Indictment of the main shareholder in a third country — Criterion of good repute — Perception of good repute by the market — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Rights of the defence)cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25319Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 February 2022.#Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of a dominant position – Gas markets of central and eastern Europe – Decision to make binding the individual commitments proposed by an undertaking – Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Whether the commitments are adequate in the light of the competition concerns initially identified in the statement of objections – Commission decision not to require commitments in relation to some of the initial concerns – Principle of sound administration – Transparency – Obligation to state reasons – Energy-policy objectives of the European Union – Principle of energy solidarity – Misuse of powers.#Case T-616/18.cjeu_case · 2 février 2022
25320Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 February 2022.#Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of a dominant position – Gas markets of central and eastern Europe – Decision to make binding the individual commitments proposed by an undertaking – Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Whether the commitments are adequate in the light of the competition concerns initially identified in the statement of objections – Commission decision not to require commitments in relation to some of the initial concerns – Principle of sound administration – Transparency – Obligation to state reasons – Energy-policy objectives of the European Union – Principle of energy solidarity – Misuse of powers.#Case T-616/18.cjeu_case · 2 février 2022