Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
25281

Case C-20/21: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — JW, HD, XS v LOT Polish Airlines (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Second indent of Article 7(1)(b) — Special jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract — Concept of ‘place of performance of the obligation in question’ — Contract for the provision of services — Air transport — Flight consisting of a confirmed single booking and performed in several legs by two separate air carriers — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Article 7 — Right to compensation — Delay on the first leg of the journey — Claim for compensation brought against the air carrier operating that first leg of the journey before the court for the place of arrival of that first flight)

cjeu_case ·
25282

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 February 2022.#B AG v Finanzamt A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 122 – Reduced rate for supplies of wood for use as firewood – Differentiation on the basis of the objective characteristics and properties of the goods – Types of wood intended for use as fuel which serve the same consumer need and are in competition with each other – Principle of fiscal neutrality.#Case C-515/20.

cjeu_case ·
25283

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 February 2022.#B AG v Finanzamt A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 122 – Reduced rate for supplies of wood for use as firewood – Differentiation on the basis of the objective characteristics and properties of the goods – Types of wood intended for use as fuel which serve the same consumer need and are in competition with each other – Principle of fiscal neutrality.#Case C-515/20.

cjeu_case ·
25284

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 February 2022.#Advania Sverige AB and Kammarkollegiet v Dustin Sverige AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 72 – Modification of contracts during their term – Transfer of a framework agreement – New contractor assuming on the insolvency of the initial contractor the rights and obligations attributed to the latter under a framework agreement – Whether need for a new procurement procedure.#Case C-461/20.

cjeu_case ·
25285

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 February 2022.#Advania Sverige AB and Kammarkollegiet v Dustin Sverige AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 72 – Modification of contracts during their term – Transfer of a framework agreement – New contractor assuming on the insolvency of the initial contractor the rights and obligations attributed to the latter under a framework agreement – Whether need for a new procurement procedure.#Case C-461/20.

cjeu_case ·
25286

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 3 February 2022.#CC v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security for migrant workers – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 44(2) – Scope – Old-age pension – Calculation – Taking into account of child-raising periods completed in other Member States – Article 21 TFEU – Free movement of citizens.#Case C-576/20.

cjeu_case ·
25287

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 3 February 2022.#A.H. v Zagrebačka banka d.d.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski građanski sud u Zagrebu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms – Directive 93/13/EEC – Applicability ratione temporis – Article 10(1) – Loan agreement concluded prior to Member State’s accession to the EU but amended after that date – Article 6 – Reimbursement of benefits improperly obtained by the seller or supplier – National legislation providing for the replacement of unfair terms and reimbursement of the overpayment – Applicability ratione materiae – Article 1(2) – Exclusion of contractual terms which reflect mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions.#Case C-567/20.

cjeu_case ·
25288

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 3 February 2022.#ÖBB-Infrastruktur Aktiengesellschaft v Lokomotion Gesellschaft für Schienentraktion mbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – International agreements – Rail transport – Convention concerning International Carriage by Rail (COTIF) – Uniform Rules concerning the Contract of Use of Infrastructure in International Rail Traffic (CUI) – Article 4 – Mandatory law – Article 8 – Liability of the manager – Article 19 – Other actions – Jurisdiction of the Court – Damage to locomotives belonging to the carrier resulting from a derailment – Lease of replacement locomotives – Obligation on the infrastructure manager to reimburse leasing costs – Contract extending the parties’ liability by a reference to national law.#Case C-500/20.

cjeu_case ·
25289

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 3 February 2022.#Asociación Estatal de Entidades de Servicios de Atención a Domicilio (ASADE) v Consejería de Igualdad y Políticas Inclusivas.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 49 and 56 TFEU – Purely internal situation – Services in the internal market – Directive 2006/123/EC – Scope – Article 2(2)(j) – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Concept of a ‘public contract’ – Articles 74 to 77 – Provision of social services in the form of personal assistance – Contractual action agreements with private, social initiative entities – Exclusion of profit-making operators – Location of the entity as a selection criterion.#Case C-436/20.

cjeu_case ·
25290

Case C-515/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — B AG v Finanzamt A (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 122 — Reduced rate for supplies of wood for use as firewood — Differentiation on the basis of the objective characteristics and properties of the goods — Types of wood intended for use as fuel which serve the same consumer need and are in competition with each other — Principle of fiscal neutrality)

cjeu_case ·
25291

Case C-461/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Advania Sverige AB, Kammarkollegiet v Dustin Sverige AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 72 — Modification of contracts during their term — Transfer of a framework agreement — New contractor assuming on the insolvency of the initial contractor the rights and obligations attributed to the latter under a framework agreement — Whether need for a new procurement procedure)

cjeu_case ·
25298

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Vita Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark VITABLOCS TriLuxe forte – Earlier EU word mark TRILUX – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-202/21.

cjeu_case ·
25299

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Vita Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark VITABLOCS TriLuxe forte – Earlier EU word mark TRILUX – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-202/21.

cjeu_case ·