24941Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 24 February 2022.#Danske Slagtermestre v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – Contributions scheme for the collection of waste water – Complaint – Decision finding that there is no State aid – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Locus standi – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Direct concern.#Case C-99/21 P.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24942Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 24 February 2022.#Sense Visuele Communicatie en Handel vof v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Direct support schemes – Common rules – Article 30(6) and Article 50(2) – Application for payment entitlements from the national reserve for young farmers – National administrative authority which has given incorrect information about the classification of a person as a ‘young farmer’ – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations – Action seeking reparation for loss or harm based on the failure to comply with the national law principle of legitimate expectations.#Case C-36/21.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24943Joined Cases C-52/21 and C-53/21: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Liège — Belgium) — Pharmacie populaire — La Sauvegarde SCRL v État belge (C-52/21), Pharma Santé — Réseau Solidaris SCRL v État belge (C-53/21) (References for a preliminary ruling — Freedom to provide services — Article 56 TFEU — Restrictions — Tax legislation — Corporation tax — Obligation for purchasers of services to draw up and submit supporting documents to the tax authorities concerning amounts invoiced by suppliers of services established in another Member State — No such obligation regarding purely domestic supplies of services — Justification — Effectiveness of fiscal supervision — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24944Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Suzlon Wind Energy Portugal - Energia Eólica Unipessoal, Lda v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c) – Application ratione temporis – Supplies subject to VAT – Supply of services for consideration – Criteria – Intra-group relationship – Supplies consisting in repairing or replacing components of wind turbines under guarantee and preparing non-compliance reports – Debit notes issued by the supplier of services with no reference to VAT – Deduction by the supplier of the VAT charged on the goods and services for which it has been invoiced by its subcontractors in respect of those supplies.#Case C-605/20.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24945Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Suzlon Wind Energy Portugal - Energia Eólica Unipessoal, Lda v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c) – Application ratione temporis – Supplies subject to VAT – Supply of services for consideration – Criteria – Intra-group relationship – Supplies consisting in repairing or replacing components of wind turbines under guarantee and preparing non-compliance reports – Debit notes issued by the supplier of services with no reference to VAT – Deduction by the supplier of the VAT charged on the goods and services for which it has been invoiced by its subcontractors in respect of those supplies.#Case C-605/20.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24946Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#SC Cridar Cons SRL v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Cluj and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 167 and 168 – Right to deduction – Refusal – Tax evasion – Taking of evidence – Suspension of examination of an administrative complaint relating to a notice of assessment refusing a right to deduction, pending the outcome of criminal proceedings – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Right to good administration – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-582/20.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24947Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#SC Cridar Cons SRL v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Cluj and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 167 and 168 – Right to deduction – Refusal – Tax evasion – Taking of evidence – Suspension of examination of an administrative complaint relating to a notice of assessment refusing a right to deduction, pending the outcome of criminal proceedings – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Right to good administration – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-582/20.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24948Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#ORLEN KolTrans sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2001/14/EC – Article 4 – Setting of infrastructure charges by decision of the manager – Article 30(2) – Railway undertakings’ right to bring an administrative action – Article 30(6) – Judicial review of the decisions of the regulatory body.#Case C-563/20.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24949Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#ORLEN KolTrans sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2001/14/EC – Article 4 – Setting of infrastructure charges by decision of the manager – Article 30(2) – Railway undertakings’ right to bring an administrative action – Article 30(6) – Judicial review of the decisions of the regulatory body.#Case C-563/20.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24950Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#UAB 'Tiketa' v M. Š.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/83/EU – Consumer contracts – Concept of ‘trader’ – Obligation to provide information in respect of distance contracts – Requirement that the necessary information be provided in plain and intelligible language and on a durable medium.#Case C-536/20.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24951Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#UAB 'Tiketa' v M. Š.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/83/EU – Consumer contracts – Concept of ‘trader’ – Obligation to provide information in respect of distance contracts – Requirement that the necessary information be provided in plain and intelligible language and on a durable medium.#Case C-536/20.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24952Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Alstom Transport SA v Compania Naţională de Căi Ferate CFR SA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 92/13/EEC – Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors – Article 1(1) and (3) – Access to review procedures – Article 2c – Time limits for applying for review – Calculation – Review of a decision allowing a tenderer to participate.#Case C-532/20.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24953Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Alstom Transport SA v Compania Naţională de Căi Ferate CFR SA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 92/13/EEC – Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors – Article 1(1) and (3) – Access to review procedures – Article 2c – Time limits for applying for review – Calculation – Review of a decision allowing a tenderer to participate.#Case C-532/20.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24954Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Namur-Est Environnement ASBL v Région wallonne.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2011/92/EU – Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats – Relationship between the assessment and consent procedure referred to in Article 2 of Directive 2011/92/EU and a national procedure for derogation from the species protection measures provided for by Directive 92/43/EEC – Concept of ‘development consent’ – Multi-stage decision-making process – Obligation to conduct an assessment – Material scope – Stage of the procedure at which public participation in the decision-making process must be ensured.#Case C-463/20.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24955Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Namur-Est Environnement ASBL v Région wallonne.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (Belgium).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2011/92/EU – Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats – Relationship between the assessment and consent procedure referred to in Article 2 of Directive 2011/92/EU and a national procedure for derogation from the species protection measures provided for by Directive 92/43/EEC – Concept of ‘development consent’ – Multi-stage decision-making process – Obligation to conduct an assessment – Material scope – Stage of the procedure at which public participation in the decision-making process must be ensured.#Case C-463/20.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24956Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#PJ v Agenzia delle dogane e dei monopoli - Ufficio dei monopoli per la Toscana and Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 23(3) – World Health Organisation Framework Convention on Tobacco Control – Prohibition on selling tobacco products to minors – Rules on penalties – Effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties – Obligation on sellers of tobacco products to verify the buyer’s age when selling those products – Fine – Operation of a tobacconist’s shop – Suspension of trading licence for a period of 15 days – Principle of proportionality – Precautionary principle.#Case C-452/20.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24957Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#PJ v Agenzia delle dogane e dei monopoli - Ufficio dei monopoli per la Toscana and Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 23(3) – World Health Organisation Framework Convention on Tobacco Control – Prohibition on selling tobacco products to minors – Rules on penalties – Effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties – Obligation on sellers of tobacco products to verify the buyer’s age when selling those products – Fine – Operation of a tobacconist’s shop – Suspension of trading licence for a period of 15 days – Principle of proportionality – Precautionary principle.#Case C-452/20.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24958Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Airhelp Limited v Austrian Airlines AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 3(1) – Scope – Flight with connecting flight departing from and arriving in a third country – Single reservation through a Community air carrier – Stopover in the territory of a Member State – Article 5(1)(c)(iii) and Article 7 – Delayed alternative flight – Taking into account of the actual arrival time for the purposes of compensation.#Case C-451/20.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24959Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Airhelp Limited v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 3(1) – Scope – Flight with connecting flight departing from and arriving in a third country – Single reservation through a Community air carrier – Stopover in the territory of a Member State – Article 5(1)(c)(iii) and Article 7 – Delayed alternative flight – Taking into account of the actual arrival time for the purposes of compensation.#Case C-451/20.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022
24960Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#CJ v Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security – Directive 79/7/EEC – Article 4(1) – Prohibition of any discrimination on grounds of sex – Domestic workers – Protection in respect of unemployment – Exclusion – Particular disadvantage to female workers – Legitimate social policy objectives – Proportionality.#Case C-389/20.cjeu_case · 24 février 2022