Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
24681

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#Maxxus Group GmbH & Co. KG v Globus Holding GmbH & Co. KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 19 – Genuine use of a trade mark – Burden of proof – Application to revoke for non-use – National procedural rule obliging the applicant to carry out market research concerning use of the mark.#Case C-183/21.

cjeu_case ·
24684

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 10 March 2022.#C and CD v Syyttäjä.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 23(3) – Requirement of intervention on the part of the executing judicial authority – Article 6(2) – Police services – Not included – Force majeure – Concept – Legal obstacles to surrender – Legal actions brought by the requested person – Application for international protection – Not included – Article 23(5) – Expiry of the time limits provided for surrender – Consequences – Release – Obligation to adopt any other measures necessary to prevent absconding.#Case C-804/21 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
24686

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 10 March 2022.#SRS and AA v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2004/38/EC – Right of Union citizens and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Article 3(2), first subparagraph, point (a) – Concept of ‘other family members who are members of the household of the Union citizen having the primary right of residence’ – Assessment criteria.#Case C-22/21.

cjeu_case ·
24687

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 10 March 2022.#Pricoforest SRL v Inspectoratul de Stat pentru Controlul în Transportul Rutier (ISCTR).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Miercurea Ciuc.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Road transport – Social legislation – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Exceptions – Article 13(1)(b) – Notion of ‘a radius of up to 100 kilometres (km) from the base of the undertaking’ – Vehicles effecting carriage within and also outside of that radius.#Case C-13/21.

cjeu_case ·
24688

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 10 March 2022.#LKW WALTER Internationale Transportorganisation AG v CB and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Bleiburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Service of documents – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Article 8(1) – One-week period within which the right to refuse to accept a document is to be exercised – Enforcement order made in one Member State and served in another Member State in the language of the first Member State only – Legislation of that first Member State laying down an eight-day period to lodge an objection to that order – Period for lodging an objection starting to run at the same time as the period laid down for the purpose of exercising the right to refuse to accept the document – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-7/21.

cjeu_case ·
24689

Case C-183/21: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken — Germany) — Maxxus Group GmbH & Co. KG v Globus Holding GmbH & Co. KG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Trade marks — Directive (EU) 2015/2436 — Article 19 — Genuine use of a trade mark — Burden of proof — Application to revoke for non-use — National procedural rule obliging the applicant to carry out market research concerning use of the mark)

cjeu_case ·
24691

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#Proceedings brought by K.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Directive 2008/115/CE – Detention for the purpose of removal – Article 16(1) – Direct effect – Specialised detention facility – Concept – Detention in prison accommodation – Conditions – Article 18 – Emergency situation – Concept – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial review.#Case C-519/20.

cjeu_case ·
24692

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#Proceedings brought by K.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Directive 2008/115/CE – Detention for the purpose of removal – Article 16(1) – Direct effect – Specialised detention facility – Concept – Detention in prison accommodation – Conditions – Article 18 – Emergency situation – Concept – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial review.#Case C-519/20.

cjeu_case ·
24693

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#ZK v BMA Braunschweigische Maschinenbauanstalt AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 7(2) – Jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Claim made by a liquidator against a third party in the interests of creditors – Place where the harmful event occurred – Article 8(2) – Application to intervene by a defendant of collective interests – Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 – Scope – General rule.#Case C-498/20.

cjeu_case ·
24694

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#ZK v BMA Braunschweigische Maschinenbauanstalt AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Midden-Nederland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 7(2) – Jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Claim made by a liquidator against a third party in the interests of creditors – Place where the harmful event occurred – Article 8(2) – Application to intervene by a defendant of collective interests – Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 – Scope – General rule.#Case C-498/20.

cjeu_case ·
24695

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#VI v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Article 21 TFEU – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 7(1)(b) and Article 16 – Child who is a national of a Member State residing in another Member State – Right of residence derived from the parent who is the primary carer of that child – Requirement of comprehensive sickness insurance cover – Child having a permanent right of residence for part of the periods concerned.#Case C-247/20.

cjeu_case ·
24696

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#VI v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Appeal Tribunal (Northern Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Article 21 TFEU – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 7(1)(b) and Article 16 – Child who is a national of a Member State residing in another Member State – Right of residence derived from the parent who is the primary carer of that child – Requirement of comprehensive sickness insurance cover – Child having a permanent right of residence for part of the periods concerned.#Case C-247/20.

cjeu_case ·
24697

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#ˮGrossmaniaˮ Mezőgazdasági Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principles of EU law – Primacy – Direct effect – Sincere cooperation – Article 4(3) TEU – Article 63 TFEU – Obligations on a Member State as a result of a preliminary ruling – Interpretation of a provision of EU law given by the Court in a preliminary ruling – Obligation to give full effect to EU law – Obligation for a national court to disapply national legislation which is contrary to EU law as interpreted by the Court – Administrative decision which became final in the absence of a challenge before the courts – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness – Liability of the Member State.#Case C-177/20.

cjeu_case ·
24698

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#ˮGrossmaniaˮ Mezőgazdasági Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principles of EU law – Primacy – Direct effect – Sincere cooperation – Article 4(3) TEU – Article 63 TFEU – Obligations on a Member State as a result of a preliminary ruling – Interpretation of a provision of EU law given by the Court in a preliminary ruling – Obligation to give full effect to EU law – Obligation for a national court to disapply national legislation which is contrary to EU law as interpreted by the Court – Administrative decision which became final in the absence of a challenge before the courts – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness – Liability of the Member State.#Case C-177/20.

cjeu_case ·
24699

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 10 March 2022.#RTL Television GmbH v Grupo Pestana S.G.P.S., S.A. and SALVOR - Sociedade de Investimento Hoteleiro, S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Copyright and related rights – Satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission – Directive 93/83/EEC – Article 1(3) – Concept of ‘cable retransmission’ – Provider of the retransmission not having the status of a cable operator – Simultaneous, unaltered and unabridged distribution of television and radio programmes broadcast by satellite and intended for reception by the public, performed by the operator of a hotel establishment, by means of a satellite dish, a cable and television or radio sets – None.#Case C-716/20.

cjeu_case ·