24261Case T-634/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — FC v EUAA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Pre-disciplinary proceedings — Suspension, withholding of remuneration and prohibition on access to EUAA’s premises and facilities — OLAF Report — Principle of sound administration — Right to be heard — Principle of impartiality — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Liability — Close link with the claim for annulment)cjeu_case · 6 avril 2022
24262Case T-508/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Mead Johnson Nutrition (Asia Pacific) and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid scheme implemented by the Government of Gibraltar concerning corporation tax — Tax exemption for interest income and royalties — Advance tax rulings benefiting multinationals — Commission decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Selective advantage — Right to submit comments)cjeu_case · 6 avril 2022
24263Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Gamal Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Egypt – Measures directed against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds – Maintenance of the applicants’ names on the list – Rights of the defence – Obligation on the Council of the European Union to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment.#Cases T-335/18, T-338/18 and T-327/19.cjeu_case · 6 avril 2022
24264Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 April 2022.#Gamal Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Egypt – Measures directed against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds – Maintenance of the applicants’ names on the list – Rights of the defence – Obligation on the Council of the European Union to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment.#Cases T-335/18, T-338/18 and T-327/19.cjeu_case · 6 avril 2022
24265Cases T-335/18, T-338/18 and T-327/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Mubarak and Others v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Egypt — Measures directed against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds — Maintenance of the applicants’ names on the list — Rights of the defence — Obligation on the Council of the European Union to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment)cjeu_case · 6 avril 2022
24266Case T-179/22: Action brought on 5 April 2022 — Farco-Pharma v EUIPO — Infarco (FARCO)cjeu_case · 5 avril 2022
24267Case C-240/22 P: Appeal brought on 5 April 2022 by European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 26 January 2022 in Case T-286/09 RENV, Intel Corporation v Commissioncjeu_case · 5 avril 2022
24268Case C-239/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 5 April 2022 — État belge and Promo 54 v Promo 54 and État belgecjeu_case · 5 avril 2022
24269Case C-238/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 5 April 2022 — FW v LATAM Airlines Group SAcjeu_case · 5 avril 2022
24270Case C-235/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional (Spain) lodged on 5 April 2022 — Criminal proceedings against Abelcjeu_case · 5 avril 2022
24271Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 April 2022.#Wolfgang Kappes v Sedus Stoll AG and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-785/21 P.cjeu_case · 5 avril 2022
24272Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 April 2022.#Wolfgang Kappes v Sedus Stoll AG and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-785/21 P.cjeu_case · 5 avril 2022
24273Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 April 2022.#Wolfgang Kappes v Sedus Stoll AG and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-784/21 P.cjeu_case · 5 avril 2022
24274Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 April 2022.#Wolfgang Kappes v Sedus Stoll AG and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-784/21 P.cjeu_case · 5 avril 2022
24275Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 April 2022.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Council decision, contained in the act of the Permanent Representatives Committee (Coreper) of 5 February 2020, endorsing the submission to the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) concerning the introduction of life cycle guidelines to estimate well-to-tank greenhouse gas emissions of sustainable alternative fuels – Article 17(1) TEU – External representation of the European Union – Transmission of that submission to the IMO by the Member State holding the Presidency of the Council, on behalf of the Member States and the Commission.#Case C-161/20.cjeu_case · 5 avril 2022
24276Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 April 2022.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Council decision, contained in the act of the Permanent Representatives Committee (Coreper) of 5 February 2020, endorsing the submission to the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) concerning the introduction of life cycle guidelines to estimate well-to-tank greenhouse gas emissions of sustainable alternative fuels – Article 17(1) TEU – External representation of the European Union – Transmission of that submission to the IMO by the Member State holding the Presidency of the Council, on behalf of the Member States and the Commission.#Case C-161/20.cjeu_case · 5 avril 2022
24277Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 April 2022.#G.D. v The Commissioner of the Garda Síochána and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Confidentiality of the communications – Providers of electronic communications services – General and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data – Access to data – Subsequent court supervision – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) – Possibility for a national court to restrict the temporal effect of a declaration of the invalidity of national legislation that is incompatible with EU law – Excluded.#Case C-140/20.cjeu_case · 5 avril 2022
24278Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 April 2022.#G.D. v The Commissioner of the Garda Síochána and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Confidentiality of the communications – Providers of electronic communications services – General and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data – Access to data – Subsequent court supervision – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) – Possibility for a national court to restrict the temporal effect of a declaration of the invalidity of national legislation that is incompatible with EU law – Excluded.#Case C-140/20.cjeu_case · 5 avril 2022
24279Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 5 April 2022.#Orde van Vlaamse Balies and Others v Vlaamse Regering.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation – Mandatory automatic exchange of information in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements – Directive 2011/16/EU, as amended by Directive (EU) 2018/822 – Article 8ab(5) – Validity – Legal professional privilege of the lawyer – Exemption from the reporting obligation for the benefit of lawyer-intermediaries subject to legal professional privilege – Obligation on that lawyer-intermediary to notify any other intermediary who is not his or her client of that intermediary’s reporting obligations – Articles 7 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-694/20.cjeu_case · 5 avril 2022
24280Case C-161/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 April 2022 — European Commission v Council of the European Union (Action for annulment — Council decision, contained in the act of the Permanent Representatives Committee (Coreper) of 5 February 2020, endorsing the submission to the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) concerning the introduction of life cycle guidelines to estimate well-to-tank greenhouse gas emissions of sustainable alternative fuels — Article 17(1) TEU — External representation of the European Union — Transmission of that submission to the IMO by the Member State holding the Presidency of the Council, on behalf of the Member States and the Commission)cjeu_case · 5 avril 2022