Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 315 documents
24141

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Fuhrmann-2-GmbH v B.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Bottrop.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Article 8(2) – Distance contracts concluded by electronic means – Information requirements for the trader – Activation of a button or a similar function in order to place the order with an obligation to pay – Unambiguous formulation corresponding to the words ‘order with obligation to pay’ – Taking account only of the words on the button or similar function for the purposes of assessing the ‘corresponding’ nature of such a formulation.#Case C-249/21.

cjeu_case ·
24142

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#D. B.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Mutual recognition – Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA – Enforcement of financial penalties – Article 1(a)(ii) – Decision imposing a financial penalty issued by an administrative authority – Decision open to appeal to a public prosecutor, subject to instructions from the Minister for Justice – Subsequent appeal before a court having jurisdiction in particular in criminal matters.#Case C-150/21.

cjeu_case ·
24143

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#D. B.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi-Śródmieścia w Łodzi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Mutual recognition – Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA – Enforcement of financial penalties – Article 1(a)(ii) – Decision imposing a financial penalty issued by an administrative authority – Decision open to appeal to a public prosecutor, subject to instructions from the Minister for Justice – Subsequent appeal before a court having jurisdiction in particular in criminal matters.#Case C-150/21.

cjeu_case ·
24145

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#KW and SG v Autonome Provinz Bozen.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht, Autonome Sektion für die Provinz Bozen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Aid granted by Member States – Aid scheme for the construction of mini-hydroelectric power plants – Alpine and mountain huts without connection to an electricity grid – Authorisation by the European Commission – Expiry.#Joined Cases C-102/21 and C-103/21.

cjeu_case ·
24146

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 7 April 2022.#État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg and Administration de l'enregistrement, des domaines et de la TVA v Navitours SARL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC – Article 2(1) – Scope – Taxable transactions – Article 9(2)(b) – Place where transport services are supplied – Tourist trips on the Moselle – River subject to condominium status.#Case C-294/21.

cjeu_case ·
24147

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 7 April 2022.#AD v PACCAR Inc and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Mercantil de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Compensation for harm caused by a practice prohibited under Article 101(1) TFEU – Collusive arrangements on pricing and gross price increases for trucks in the European Economic Area (EEA) – Directive 2014/104/EU – Rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Article 22(2) – Applicability ratione temporis – First subparagraph of Article 5(1) – Concept of relevant evidence which lies in the control of the defendant or a third party – Article 5(2) – Disclosure of specified items of evidence or relevant categories of evidence on the basis of reasonably available facts – Article 5(3) – Review of the proportionality of the request to disclose evidence – Balancing the legitimate interests of the parties and third parties – Scope of the obligations resulting from those provisions.#Case C-163/21.

cjeu_case ·
24148

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 7 April 2022.#I and S v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Article 8(2) and Article 27(1) – Unaccompanied minor with a relative legally present in another Member State – Refusal by that Member State of that minor’s take charge request – Right to an effective remedy of that minor or of that relative against the refusal decision – Articles 7, 24 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Best interests of the child.#Case C-19/21.

cjeu_case ·
24150

Case C-133/21: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Efeteio Athinon — Greece) — VP, CX, RG, TR and Others v Elliniko Dimosio (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social Policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 4 — Principle of non-discrimination — Successive fixed-term contracts in the public sector — National legislation establishing a difference in treatment as regards remuneration between workers employed under fixed-term contracts for the supply of services and those employed under contracts of indefinite duration — No justification — Concept of ‘objective reasons’)

cjeu_case ·
24151

Case C-249/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Bottrop — Germany) — Fuhrmann-2-GmbH v B. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Article 8(2) — Distance contracts concluded by electronic means — Information requirements for the trader — Activation of a button or a similar function in order to place the order with an obligation to pay — Unambiguous formulation corresponding to the words ‘order with obligation to pay’ — Taking account only of the words on the button or similar function for the purposes of assessing the ‘corresponding’ nature of such a formulation)

cjeu_case ·
24152

Case C-150/21: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi-Śródmieścia w Łodzi — Poland) — Proceedings relating to the recognition and enforcement of a financial penalty imposed on D.B. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Mutual recognition — Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA — Enforcement of financial penalties — Article 1(a)(ii) — Decision imposing a financial penalty issued by an administrative authority — Decision open to appeal to a public prosecutor, subject to instructions from the Minister for Justice — Subsequent appeal before a court having jurisdiction in particular in criminal matters)

cjeu_case ·
24153

Joined Cases C-102/21 and C-103/21: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht, Autonome Sektion für die Provinz Bozen — Italy) — KW (C-102/21), SG (C-103/21) v Autonome Provinz Bozen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Aid granted by Member States — Aid scheme for the construction of mini-hydroelectric power plants — Alpine and mountain huts without connection to an electricity grid — Authorisation by the European Commission — Expiry)

cjeu_case ·
24156

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#J.P. v B.d.S.L.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/62/EC – Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures – Tolls – Non-payment – Penalties – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Ne bis in idem principle – Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure – Lack of sufficient information – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-521/20.

cjeu_case ·
24157

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#J.P. v B.d.S.L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/62/EC – Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures – Tolls – Non-payment – Penalties – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Ne bis in idem principle – Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure – Lack of sufficient information – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-521/20.

cjeu_case ·
24159

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Y GmbH v Hauptzollamt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Classification of goods – Headings 1302, 3301 and 3302 – Extracted vanilla oleoresin – Excise duties – Directive 92/83/EEC – Exemptions – Article 27(1)(e) – Definition of ‘flavour’ – Directive 92/12/EEC – Excise Committee of the European Commission – Powers.#Case C-668/20.

cjeu_case ·
24160

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#V A and Z A v TP.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Article 10 – Subsidiary jurisdiction in matters of succession – Deceased person habitually resident at the time of his or her death in a State that is not bound by Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Deceased person who is a national of a Member State and has assets in that Member State – Obligation for the court of that Member State seised to examine of its own motion the criteria as regards its subsidiary jurisdiction – Appointment of an administrator of the estate.#Case C-645/20.

cjeu_case ·