24001Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Paula Correia v European Economic and Social Committee.#Civil service – EESC staff – Members of the temporary staff – Request for career reconstitution – Rejection of the request – Action for annulment – Proper conduct of the pre-litigation procedure – Time limit for lodging a complaint – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Equal treatment – Legal certainty – Entitlement to reasonable career prospects – Absence of a right to career constitution – Obligation to carry out a consideration of the comparative merits – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-750/20.cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24002Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Petra Flašker v European Commission.#State aid – Measures granted by Slovenia to a municipal network of dispensing pharmacies – Preliminary examination phase – Decision of the Commission finding no State aid and, possibly, that there is existing aid – Decision adopted without initiating the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU – Serious difficulties.#Case T-392/20.cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24003Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Petra Flašker v European Commission.#State aid – Measures granted by Slovenia to a municipal network of dispensing pharmacies – Preliminary examination phase – Decision of the Commission finding no State aid and, possibly, that there is existing aid – Decision adopted without initiating the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU – Serious difficulties.#Case T-392/20.cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24004Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Group Nivelles v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a shower drainage channel – Earlier design produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Scope – Article 63(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Oral proceedings and measures of inquiry – Articles 64 and 65 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Ground for invalidity – Individual character – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Identification of the earlier design – Earlier whole design – Determination of the features of the contested design – Global comparison.#Case T-327/20.cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24005Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Group Nivelles v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a shower drainage channel – Earlier design produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Scope – Article 63(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Oral proceedings and measures of inquiry – Articles 64 and 65 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Ground for invalidity – Individual character – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Identification of the earlier design – Earlier whole design – Determination of the features of the contested design – Global comparison.#Case T-327/20.cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24006Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz – Port Polski Ośrodek Rozwoju Technologii v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Grant agreement concluded in the context of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Eligible costs – Request for reimbursement – Financial audit – OLAF investigation – Conflict of interest on account of family or emotional ties – Principle of good faith – Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of marital status – Legitimate expectations – Action for annulment – Debit notes – Acts inseparable from the contract – Act not open to challenge – Right to effective judicial review – Inadmissibility.#Case T-4/20.cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24007Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz – Port Polski Ośrodek Rozwoju Technologii v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Grant agreement concluded in the context of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Eligible costs – Request for reimbursement – Financial audit – OLAF investigation – Conflict of interest on account of family or emotional ties – Principle of good faith – Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of marital status – Legitimate expectations – Action for annulment – Debit notes – Acts inseparable from the contract – Act not open to challenge – Right to effective judicial review – Inadmissibility.#Case T-4/20.cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24008Case T-750/20: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Correia v EESC (Civil service — EESC staff — Members of the temporary staff — Request for career reconstitution — Rejection of the request — Action for annulment — Proper conduct of the pre-litigation procedure — Time limit for lodging a complaint — Interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Equal treatment — Legal certainty — Entitlement to reasonable career prospects — Absence of a right to career constitution — Obligation to carry out a consideration of the comparative merits — Liability — Non-material damage)cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24009Case T-392/20: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Flašker v Commission (State aid — Measures granted by Slovenia to a municipal network of dispensing pharmacies — Preliminary examination phase — Decision of the Commission finding no State aid and, possibly, that there is existing aid — Decision adopted without initiating the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU — Serious difficulties)cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24010Case T-327/20: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Group Nivelles v EUIPO — Easy Sanitary Solutions (Shower drainage channel) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a shower drainage channel — Earlier design produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity — Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Scope — Article 63(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Oral proceedings and measures of inquiry — Articles 64 and 65 of Regulation No 6/2002 — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 — Identification of the earlier design — Earlier whole design — Determination of the features of the contested design — Global comparison)cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24011Case T-4/20: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz — Port Polski Ośrodek Rozwoju Technologii v Commission (Arbitration clause — Grant agreement concluded in the context of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Eligible costs — Request for reimbursement — Financial audit — OLAF investigation — Conflict of interest on account of family or emotional ties — Principle of good faith — Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of marital status — Legitimate expectations — Action for annulment — Debit notes — Acts inseparable from the contract — Act not open to challenge — Right to effective judicial review — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24012Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Airbnb Ireland UC v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Article 114(2) TFEU – Exclusion of fiscal provisions – Directive 2000/31/EC – Information society services – Electronic commerce – Online property rental platform – Article 1(5)(a) – Exclusion of the field of taxation – Definition – Regional legislation concerning a tax on tourist accommodation establishments – Provision requiring intermediaries to provide, on a written request, certain particulars concerning the operation of those establishments to the tax authority with the aim of identifying persons liable for that tax – Article 56 TFEU – No discrimination – No restriction.#Case C-674/20.cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24013Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Airbnb Ireland UC v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Article 114(2) TFEU – Exclusion of fiscal provisions – Directive 2000/31/EC – Information society services – Electronic commerce – Online property rental platform – Article 1(5)(a) – Exclusion of the field of taxation – Definition – Regional legislation concerning a tax on tourist accommodation establishments – Provision requiring intermediaries to provide, on a written request, certain particulars concerning the operation of those establishments to the tax authority with the aim of identifying persons liable for that tax – Article 56 TFEU – No discrimination – No restriction.#Case C-674/20.cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24014Case C-674/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle — Belgium) — Airbnb Ireland UC v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market — Article 114(2) TFEU — Exclusion of fiscal provisions — Directive 2000/31/EC — Information society services — Electronic commerce — Online property rental platform — Article 1(5)(a) — Exclusion of the field of taxation — Definition — Regional legislation concerning a tax on tourist accommodation establishments — Provision requiring intermediaries to provide, on a written request, certain particulars concerning the operation of those establishments to the tax authority with the aim of identifying persons liable for that tax — Article 56 TFEU — No discrimination — No restriction)cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24015Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Subsidies – Imports of cycles, with pedal assistance, with an auxiliary electric motor, originating in China – Definitive countervailing duties – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/72 – Determination of injury – Article 8(1), (2) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Price undercutting calculation – Causal link.#Case T-243/19.cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24016Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Subsidies – Imports of cycles, with pedal assistance, with an auxiliary electric motor, originating in China – Definitive countervailing duties – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/72 – Determination of injury – Article 8(1), (2) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Price undercutting calculation – Causal link.#Case T-243/19.cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24017Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of cycles, with pedal assistance, with an auxiliary electric motor, originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/73 – Determination of injury – Article 3(2), (3) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Price undercutting calculation – Causal link.#Case T-242/19.cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24018Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of cycles, with pedal assistance, with an auxiliary electric motor, originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/73 – Determination of injury – Article 3(2), (3) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Price undercutting calculation – Causal link.#Case T-242/19.cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24019Case T-243/19: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan v Commission (Subsidies — Imports of cycles, with pedal assistance, with an auxiliary electric motor, originating in China — Definitive countervailing duties — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/72 — Determination of injury — Article 8(1), (2) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 — Price undercutting calculation — Causal link)cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022
24020Case T-242/19: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan v Commission (Dumping — Imports of cycles, with pedal assistance, with an auxiliary electric motor, originating in China — Definitive anti-dumping duties — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/73 — Determination of injury — Article 3(2), (3) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Price undercutting calculation — Causal link)cjeu_case · 27 avril 2022