23861Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 April 2022.#Stefania Abenante and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Regulation (EU) 2021/953 – EU Digital COVID Certificate – Freedom of movement for persons – Restrictions – No legal interest in bringing proceedings – No direct concern – No individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-527/21.cjeu_case · 29 avril 2022
23862Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 April 2022.#Stefania Abenante and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Regulation (EU) 2021/953 – EU Digital COVID Certificate – Freedom of movement for persons – Restrictions – No legal interest in bringing proceedings – No direct concern – No individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-527/21.cjeu_case · 29 avril 2022
23863Case T-527/21: Order of the General Court of 29 April 2022 — Abenante and Others v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Regulation (EU) 2021/953 — EU Digital COVID Certificate — Freedom of movement for persons — Restrictions — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — No direct concern — No individual concern — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 29 avril 2022
23864Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 April 2022.#Valvis Holding SA v Sun Stars & Sons Pte Ltd and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – EU trade mark – Appeal brought by a party which was not unsuccessful in its submissions at first instance – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-420/21 P.cjeu_case · 29 avril 2022
23865Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 April 2022.#Valvis Holding SA v Sun Stars & Sons Pte Ltd and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – EU trade mark – Appeal brought by a party which was not unsuccessful in its submissions at first instance – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-420/21 P.cjeu_case · 29 avril 2022
23866Case C-637/21: Order of the President of the Court of 29 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — K.R., Other party: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheidcjeu_case · 29 avril 2022
23867Case T-236/22: Action brought on 28 April 2022 — Intel Corporation v Commissioncjeu_case · 28 avril 2022
23869Case T-232/22: Action brought on 28 April 2022 — Growth Finance Plus v EUIPO (catlover)cjeu_case · 28 avril 2022
23870Case T-231/22: Action brought on 28 April 2022 — Growth Finance Plus v EUIPO (doglover)cjeu_case · 28 avril 2022
23871Case C-286/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie (Belgium) lodged on 28 April 2022 — KBC Verzekeringen NV v P&V Verzekeringen CVBAcjeu_case · 28 avril 2022
23872Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Rozhlas a televízia Slovenska v CI.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Scope – Legal relationship between a national radio broadcaster and a natural person who is subject to the radio fee – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-638/21.cjeu_case · 28 avril 2022
23873Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Rozhlas a televízia Slovenska v CI.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Scope – Legal relationship between a national radio broadcaster and a natural person who is subject to the radio fee – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-638/21.cjeu_case · 28 avril 2022
23874Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#C and CD v Syyttäjä.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 23(3) – Requirement of intervention on the part of the executing judicial authority – Article 6(2) – Police services – Not included – Force majeure – Concept – Legal obstacles to surrender – Legal actions brought by the requested person – Application for international protection – Not included – Article 23(5) – Expiry of the time limits provided for surrender – Consequences – Release – Obligation to adopt any other measures necessary to prevent absconding.#Case C-804/21 PPU.cjeu_case · 28 avril 2022
23875Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#C and CD v Syyttäjä.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 23(3) – Requirement of intervention on the part of the executing judicial authority – Article 6(2) – Police services – Not included – Force majeure – Concept – Legal obstacles to surrender – Legal actions brought by the requested person – Application for international protection – Not included – Article 23(5) – Expiry of the time limits provided for surrender – Consequences – Release – Obligation to adopt any other measures necessary to prevent absconding.#Case C-804/21 PPU.cjeu_case · 28 avril 2022
23876Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#European Commission v French Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 2008/50/EC – Ambient air quality – Article 13(1) and Annex XI – Systematic and persistent exceedance of the limit values for micro particles (PM10) in certain zones in France – Article 23(1) – Annex XV – Exceedance period to be ‘as short as possible’ – Appropriate measures.#Case C-286/21.cjeu_case · 28 avril 2022
23877Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#European Commission v French Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 2008/50/EC – Ambient air quality – Article 13(1) and Annex XI – Systematic and persistent exceedance of the limit values for micro particles (PM10) in certain zones in France – Article 23(1) – Annex XV – Exceedance period to be ‘as short as possible’ – Appropriate measures.#Case C-286/21.cjeu_case · 28 avril 2022
23878Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Secrétariat général de l’Enseignement catholique ASBL (SeGEC) and Others v Institut des Comptes nationaux (ICN) and Banque nationale de Belgique.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 – European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union – Annex A, paragraph 20.15 – Control exercised by an institute of national accounts over the organising authorities of educational establishments constituted in the form of non-profit institutions – Educational establishments receiving public financing and enjoying freedom of education guaranteed by the Constitution – Annex A, paragraph 20.15, second sentence – Concept of ‘public intervention in the form of general regulations applicable to all units working in the same activity’ – Scope – Annex A, paragraph 20.15, first sentence – Annex A, paragraph 2.39(b), paragraph 20.15(b), and paragraph 20.309(h) – Concept of ‘excessive regulation’ – Scope.#Case C-277/21.cjeu_case · 28 avril 2022
23879Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#Secrétariat général de l’Enseignement catholique ASBL (SeGEC) and Others v Institut des Comptes nationaux (ICN) and Banque nationale de Belgique.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 – European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union – Annex A, paragraph 20.15 – Control exercised by an institute of national accounts over the organising authorities of educational establishments constituted in the form of non-profit institutions – Educational establishments receiving public financing and enjoying freedom of education guaranteed by the Constitution – Annex A, paragraph 20.15, second sentence – Concept of ‘public intervention in the form of general regulations applicable to all units working in the same activity’ – Scope – Annex A, paragraph 20.15, first sentence – Annex A, paragraph 2.39(b), paragraph 20.15(b), and paragraph 20.309(h) – Concept of ‘excessive regulation’ – Scope.#Case C-277/21.cjeu_case · 28 avril 2022
23880Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#'Piltenes meži' SIA v Lauku atbalsta dienests.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 – Support for rural development by the EAFRD – Article 30 – Natura 2000 payments – Scope – Application for aid in respect of a micro-reserve created in a forest that is not part of the Natura 2000 network, with the purpose of protecting a species of wild bird – Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 – Block exemption for certain types of aid to the agriculture and forestry sectors – Application to aid co-financed by means of EU resources – No application to undertakings in difficulty.#Case C-251/21.cjeu_case · 28 avril 2022