Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
23821

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 4 May 2022 (Extracts).#China Rubber Industry Association (CRIA) and China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters (CCCMC) v European Commission.#Dumping – Subsidies – Imports of certain pneumatic tyres, new or retreaded, of rubber, of a kind used for buses or lorries, with a load index exceeding 121 originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Definitive countervailing duty – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Direct concern – Individual concern – Regulatory act which does not entail implementing measures – Interest in bringing proceedings – Injury to the EU industry – Objective examination – Causal link – Calculation of the price undercutting and the injury margin – Fair comparison of prices – Constructed import prices – Prices charged to first independent buyers – Difference in the level of trade – Complex economic assessments – Intensity of judicial review – Injury indicators – Weighting of the data – Access to non-confidential investigation data – Rights of the defence.#Case T-30/19 and T-72/19.

cjeu_case ·
23822

Cases T-30/19 and T-72/19: Judgment of the General Court of 4 May 2022 — CRIA and CCCMC v Commission (Dumping — Subsidies — Imports of certain pneumatic tyres, new or retreaded, of rubber, of a kind used for buses or lorries, with a load index exceeding 121 originating in China — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Definitive countervailing duty — Action for annulment — Locus standi — Direct concern — Individual concern — Regulatory act which does not entail implementing measures — Interest in bringing proceedings — Injury to the Union industry — Objective examination — Causal link — Calculation of the price undercutting and the injury margin — Fair comparison of prices — Constructed import prices — Prices charged to first independent buyers — Difference in the level of trade — Complex economic assessments — Intensity of judicial review — Injury indicators — Weighting of the data — Access to non-confidential investigation data — Rights of the defence)

cjeu_case ·
23823

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 4 May 2022.#Larko Geniki Metalleftiki kai Metallourgiki AE v European Commission.#State aid – Aid implemented by Greece – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market – Concept of State aid – Advantage – Private operator principle – Guarantee premium – Firm in difficulty – Knowledge of the Greek authorities – Commission Notice on State aid in the form of guarantees – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-423/14 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
23824

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 4 May 2022.#Larko Geniki Metalleftiki kai Metallourgiki AE v European Commission.#State aid – Aid implemented by Greece – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market – Concept of State aid – Advantage – Private operator principle – Guarantee premium – Firm in difficulty – Knowledge of the Greek authorities – Commission Notice on State aid in the form of guarantees – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-423/14 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
23837

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 May 2022.#CityRail a.s. v Správa železnic, státní organizace.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFUE – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria relating to the body’s constitution and function – Exercise of judicial or administrative functions – Directive 2012/34/EU – Articles 55 and 56 – Single national regulatory body for the railway sector – Independent regulatory authority for the sector – Entitlement to act on an ex-officio basis – Power to impose penalties – Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-453/20.

cjeu_case ·
23838

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 May 2022.#CityRail a.s. v Správa železnic, státní organizace.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Úřad pro přístup k dopravní infrastruktuře.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFUE – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria relating to the body’s constitution and function – Exercise of judicial or administrative functions – Directive 2012/34/EU – Articles 55 and 56 – Single national regulatory body for the railway sector – Independent regulatory authority for the sector – Entitlement to act on an ex-officio basis – Power to impose penalties – Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-453/20.

cjeu_case ·
23839

Case C-453/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Úřad pro přístup k dopravní infrastruktuře — Czech Republic) — CityRail a.s. v Správa železnic, státní organizace (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFUE — Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ — Criteria relating to the constitution and function of that body — Exercise of judicial or administrative functions — Directive 2012/34/EU — Articles 55 and 56 — Single national regulatory body for the railway sector — Independent regulatory authority for the sector — Entitlement to act on an ex officio basis — Power to impose penalties — Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts — Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

cjeu_case ·