Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
23807

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 May 2022.#Advanced Superabrasives, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark ASI ADVANCED SUPERABRASIVES – Earlier EU figurative and word marks ADI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Remittal of the case to the Opposition Division – Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(3)(b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-4/21.

cjeu_case ·
23810

Case T-261/21: Judgment of the General Court of 4 May 2022 — Sturz v EUIPO — Clatronic International (STEAKER) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark STEAKER — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No distinctive character — Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Right to be heard — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
23813

Case T-4/21: Judgment of the General Court of 4 May 2022 — Advanced Superabrasives v EUIPO — Adi (ASI ADVANCED SUPERABRASIVES) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark ASI ADVANCED SUPERABRASIVES — Earlier EU figurative and word marks ADI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Remittal of the case to the Opposition Division — Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 27(3)(b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)

cjeu_case ·
23814

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 4 May 2022.#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#State aid – Air transport – Support measure taken by Romania – Rescue aid to TAROM – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Status as a party concerned – Safeguarding of procedural rights – Admissibility – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty – Measure aiming to prevent social hardship or to address market failure – ‘One time, last time’ principle – Effect of earlier aid granted before Romania’s accession to the European Union – Serious difficulties – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-718/20.

cjeu_case ·
23815

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 4 May 2022.#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#State aid – Air transport – Support measure taken by Romania – Rescue aid to TAROM – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Status as a party concerned – Safeguarding of procedural rights – Admissibility – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty – Measure aiming to prevent social hardship or to address market failure – ‘One time, last time’ principle – Effect of earlier aid granted before Romania’s accession to the European Union – Serious difficulties – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-718/20.

cjeu_case ·
23818

Case T-718/20: Judgment of the General Court of 4 May 2022 — Wizz Air Hungary v Commission (TAROM; Rescue Aid) (State aid — Air transport — Support measure taken by Romania — Rescue aid to TAROM — Decision not to raise any objections — Action for annulment — Status as a party concerned — Safeguarding of procedural rights — Admissibility — Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty — Measure aiming to prevent social hardship or to address market failure — ‘One time, last time’ principle — Effect of earlier aid granted before Romania’s accession to the European Union — Serious difficulties — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
23820

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 4 May 2022 (Extracts).#China Rubber Industry Association (CRIA) and China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters (CCCMC) v European Commission.#Dumping – Subsidies – Imports of certain pneumatic tyres, new or retreaded, of rubber, of a kind used for buses or lorries, with a load index exceeding 121 originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Definitive countervailing duty – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Direct concern – Individual concern – Regulatory act which does not entail implementing measures – Interest in bringing proceedings – Injury to the EU industry – Objective examination – Causal link – Calculation of the price undercutting and the injury margin – Fair comparison of prices – Constructed import prices – Prices charged to first independent buyers – Difference in the level of trade – Complex economic assessments – Intensity of judicial review – Injury indicators – Weighting of the data – Access to non-confidential investigation data – Rights of the defence.#Case T-30/19 and T-72/19.

cjeu_case ·