Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
23702

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 May 2022.#Creaticon d.o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – EU figurative mark SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE – Earlier national word mark SKINTEGRITY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-93/21.

cjeu_case ·
23703

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 May 2022.#Creaticon d.o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – EU figurative mark SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE – Earlier national word mark SKINTEGRITY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-93/21.

cjeu_case ·
23704

Case T-93/21: Judgment of the General Court of 11 May 2022 — Creaticon v EUIPO — Paul Hartmann (SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — EU figurative mark SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE — Earlier national word mark SKINTEGRITY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
23705

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 May 2022.#Czech Republic v European Commission.#Own resources of the European Union – Financial liability of a Member State – Import duties – Payment to the Commission of amounts corresponding to non-recovered own resources – Action based on unjust enrichment of the European Union – Obligations of a Member State with regard to own resources – Obligation to lodge a security – Exemption from making available amounts corresponding to established entitlements declared irrecoverable.#Case T-151/20.

cjeu_case ·
23706

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 May 2022.#Czech Republic v European Commission.#Own resources of the European Union – Financial liability of a Member State – Import duties – Payment to the Commission of amounts corresponding to non-recovered own resources – Action based on unjust enrichment of the European Union – Obligations of a Member State with regard to own resources – Obligation to lodge a security – Exemption from making available amounts corresponding to established entitlements declared irrecoverable.#Case T-151/20.

cjeu_case ·
23707

Case T-151/20: Judgment of the General Court of 11 May 2022 — Czech Republic v Commission (Own resources of the European Union — Financial liability of a Member State — Import duties — Payment to the Commission of amounts corresponding to non-recovered own resources — Action based on unjust enrichment of the European Union — Obligations of a Member State with regard to own resources — Obligation to lodge a security — Exemption from making available amounts corresponding to established entitlements declared irrecoverable)

cjeu_case ·
23708

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 May 2022.#Finanziaria d'investimento Fininvest SpA (Fininvest) and Silvio Berlusconi v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB – Assessment of acquisitions of qualifying holdings – Opposition to the acquisition of a qualifying holding – Non-retroactivity – Res judicata – Application of national transposing measures – Rights of the defence – Right of access to the file – Right to be heard – New plea – Primacy of EU law – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-913/16.

cjeu_case ·
23709

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 May 2022.#Finanziaria d'investimento Fininvest SpA (Fininvest) and Silvio Berlusconi v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB – Assessment of acquisitions of qualifying holdings – Opposition to the acquisition of a qualifying holding – Non-retroactivity – Res judicata – Application of national transposing measures – Rights of the defence – Right of access to the file – Right to be heard – New plea – Primacy of EU law – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-913/16.

cjeu_case ·
23710

Case T-913/16: Judgment of the General Court of 11 May 2022 — Fininvest and Berlusconi v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB — Assessment of acquisitions of qualifying holdings — Opposition to the acquisition of a qualifying holding — Non-retroactivity — Res judicata — Application of national transposing measures — Rights of the defence — Right of access to the file — Right to be heard — New plea — Primacy of EU law — Right to effective judicial protection)

cjeu_case ·