Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
23344

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 2 June 2022.#M.A. v Valstybės sienos apsaugos tarnyba.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Asylum and immigration policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 4 – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Articles 6 and 7 – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 8 – Detention of the applicant – Ground for detention – Protection of national security or public order – Detention of the applicant for having entered the territory of the European Union unlawfully.#Case C-72/22 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
23348

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#Marie-Christine Arnautu v European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Institutional law – Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Article 33(1) and (2) – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of undue payments – Plea of illegality – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations – Assessment of evidence – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-573/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
23349

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#Marie-Christine Arnautu v European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Institutional law – Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Article 33(1) and (2) – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of undue payments – Plea of illegality – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations – Assessment of evidence – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-573/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
23350

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#Joëlle Mélin v European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Institutional law – Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Article 33(1) and (2) – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of undue payments – Plea of illegality – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations – Assessment of evidence – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-541/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
23351

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#Joëlle Mélin v European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Institutional law – Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Article 33(1) and (2) – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of undue payments – Plea of illegality – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations – Assessment of evidence – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-541/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
23352

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#EM v European Parliament.#Appeal – Civil service – European Parliament – Member of the temporary staff in the service of a political group – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 7 – Transfer – Article 12 and Article 12a(3) – Concept of ‘psychological harassment’ – Failure to assign tasks – Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union – Request for assistance – Loss or harm – Compensation.#Case C-299/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
23353

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#EM v European Parliament.#Appeal – Civil service – European Parliament – Member of the temporary staff in the service of a political group – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 7 – Transfer – Article 12 and Article 12a(3) – Concept of ‘psychological harassment’ – Failure to assign tasks – Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union – Request for assistance – Loss or harm – Compensation.#Case C-299/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
23354

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#SR v EW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Article 5 – Translation of the document – Translation costs borne by the applicant – Concept of ‘applicant’ – Service, by the court before which proceedings have been brought, of judicial documents on interveners in the proceedings.#Case C-196/21.

cjeu_case ·
23355

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#SR v EW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Ilfov.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Article 5 – Translation of the document – Translation costs borne by the applicant – Concept of ‘applicant’ – Service, by the court before which proceedings have been brought, of judicial documents on interveners in the proceedings.#Case C-196/21.

cjeu_case ·
23357

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#Get Fresh Cosmetics Limited v Valstybinė vartotojų teisių apsaugos tarnyba.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 87/357/EEC – Article 1(2) – Scope – Non-food products that may be confused with foodstuffs – Concept – Risk of suffocation, poisoning, or the perforation or obstruction of the digestive tract – No presumption of danger – Proof.#Case C-122/21.

cjeu_case ·
23358

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#X BV v Classic Coach Company and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 5 – Rights conferred by a trade mark – Article 6(2) – Limitation of the effects of the trade mark – Impossibility for the proprietor of a trade mark to prevent a third party from using, in the course of trade, an earlier right applying in a particular locality – Requirements – Concept of ‘earlier right’ – Trade name – Proprietor of a later trade mark with an even earlier right – Relevance.#Case C-112/21.

cjeu_case ·
23359

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022.#X BV v Classic Coach Company and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 5 – Rights conferred by a trade mark – Article 6(2) – Limitation of the effects of the trade mark – Impossibility for the proprietor of a trade mark to prevent a third party from using, in the course of trade, an earlier right applying in a particular locality – Requirements – Concept of ‘earlier right’ – Trade name – Proprietor of a later trade mark with an even earlier right – Relevance.#Case C-112/21.

cjeu_case ·