23201Case C-395/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 14 June 2022 — Trade Express-L OOD v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia ‘Darzhaven rezerv i voennovremenni zapasi’cjeu_case · 14 juin 2022
23202Case C-391/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Pécsi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 14 June 2022 — Tüke Busz Közösségi Közlekedési Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóságacjeu_case · 14 juin 2022
23203Case C-390/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad Burgas (Bulgaria) lodged on 14 June 2022 — Obshtina Pomorie v ‘Anhialo auto’ OODcjeu_case · 14 juin 2022
23204Case C-388/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 14 June 2022 — flightright GmbH v Transportes Aéreos Portugueses SA (TAP)cjeu_case · 14 juin 2022
23205Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 June 2022.#FJ and Others v European External Action Service.#Civil Service – Officials – Remuneration – EEAS staff posted to a third country – Interim update of correction coefficients – Manifest error of assessment – Retroactive effect – Legal certainty – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-246/21.cjeu_case · 14 juin 2022
23206Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 June 2022.#FJ and Others v European External Action Service.#Civil Service – Officials – Remuneration – EEAS staff posted to a third country – Interim update of correction coefficients – Manifest error of assessment – Retroactive effect – Legal certainty – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-246/21.cjeu_case · 14 juin 2022
23207Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 June 2022.#FZ and Others v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – Commission staff posted to a third country – Interim update of correction coefficients – Manifest error of assessment – Retroactive effect – Legal certainty – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-236/21.cjeu_case · 14 juin 2022
23208Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 June 2022.#FZ and Others v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – Commission staff posted to a third country – Interim update of correction coefficients – Manifest error of assessment – Retroactive effect – Legal certainty – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-236/21.cjeu_case · 14 juin 2022
23209Case T-246/21: Order of the General Court of 14 June 2022 — FJ and Others v EEAS (Civil Service — Officials — Remuneration — EEAS staff posted to a third country — Interim update of correction coefficients — Manifest error of assessment — Retroactive effect — Legal certainty — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 14 juin 2022
23210Case T-236/21: Order of the General Court of 14 June 2022 — FZ and Others v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Commission staff posted to a third country — Interim update of correction coefficients — Manifest error of assessment — Retroactive effect — Legal certainty — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 14 juin 2022
23211Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 14 June 2022.#SIA 'DOBELES HES' and Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – National legislation imposing an obligation on the public operator to purchase from renewable energy producers at a price higher than the market price – Failure to pay a portion of the aid concerned – Application for compensation submitted by those producers to a public authority distinct from that which is, in principle, required, under that national legislation, to pay that aid and whose budget is intended solely to ensure its own operation – New aid – Notification requirement – De minimis aid – Regulation (EU) No 1407/2013 – Article 5(2) – Cumulation – Taking into account the amounts of aid already received during the reference period on the basis of that national legislation.#Joined Cases C-702/20 and C-17/21.cjeu_case · 14 juin 2022
23213Case T-352/22: Action brought on 13 June 2022 — De Dietrich Process Systems v EUIPO — Koch-Glitsch (KARR)cjeu_case · 13 juin 2022
23214Case T-351/22: Action brought on 13 June 2022 — De Dietrich Process Systems v EUIPO — Koch-Glitsch (SCHEIBEL)cjeu_case · 13 juin 2022
23215Case C-389/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 13 June 2022 — GC and Others v Croce Rossa Italiana and Otherscjeu_case · 13 juin 2022
23216Case C-386/22 P: Appeal brought on 13 June2022 by Martinair Holland NV against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 30 March 2022 in Case T-323/17, Martinair Holland v Commissioncjeu_case · 13 juin 2022
23217Case C-385/22 P: Appeal brought on 13 June 2022 by Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 30 March 2022 in Case T-325/17, Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij v Commissioncjeu_case · 13 juin 2022
23218Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 June 2022.#Ana Carla Mendes de Almeida v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Appointment of the European Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Appointment of one of the candidates nominated by Portugal – No dispute between the Union and one of its servants within the limits and under the conditions laid down in the Staff Regulations and the CEOS – Article 270 TFEU – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-334/21.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2022
23219Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 June 2022.#Ana Carla Mendes de Almeida v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Appointment of the European Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Appointment of one of the candidates nominated by Portugal – No dispute between the Union and one of its servants within the limits and under the conditions laid down in the Staff Regulations and the CEOS – Article 270 TFEU – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-334/21.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2022
23220Case T-334/21: Order of the General Court of 13 June 2022 — Mendes de Almeida v Council (Civil service — Appointment of the European Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office — Appointment of one of the candidates nominated by Portugal — No dispute between the Union and one of its servants within the limits and under the conditions laid down in the Staff Regulations and the CEOS — Article 270 TFEU — Manifest lack of jurisdiction)cjeu_case · 13 juin 2022