23141Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#European Commission v Republic of Austria.#Failure to fulfil obligations – Coordination of social security systems – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Articles 4, 7 and 67 – Freedom of movement for workers – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7 – Equal treatment – Family benefits – Social and tax advantages – Adjustment of amounts on the basis of price levels in the children’s State of residence.#Case C-328/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23142Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#European Commission v Republic of Austria.#Failure to fulfil obligations – Coordination of social security systems – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Articles 4, 7 and 67 – Freedom of movement for workers – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7 – Equal treatment – Family benefits – Social and tax advantages – Adjustment of amounts on the basis of price levels in the children’s State of residence.#Case C-328/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23143Opinion C-1/20: Opinion of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022 — Kingdom of Belgium (Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Request for an Opinion — Draft modernised Energy Charter Treaty — Article 26 — Dispute settlement mechanism — Admissibility)cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23144Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 16 June 2022.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#Appeal – External relations – Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and Kosovo, of the other part – Electronic communications – Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 – Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) – Article 35(2) – Participation of the regulatory authority of Kosovo in that body – Concepts of ‘third country’ and ‘third State’ – Competence of the European Commission.#Case C-632/20 P.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23145Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 16 June 2022.#X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Utrecht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Article 20 TFEU – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Decision of a Member State refusing residence to a third-country national parent of a minor child who has the nationality of that Member State – Child living outside the territory of the European Union and never having resided in its territory.#Case C-459/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23146Case C-596/20: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — DuoDecad Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 2, 24 et 43 — Place of supply of services — Technical support services provided to a company established in another Member State — Abuse of rights — Assessment of the facts — Lack of jurisdiction)cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23147Case C-577/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Proceedings brought by A (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Recognition of professional qualifications — Directive 2005/36/EC — Article 2 — Scope — Article 13(2) — Regulated professions — Conditions for pursuing the profession of psychotherapist in a Member State on the basis of a diploma in psychotherapy issued by a university established in another Member State — Articles 45 and 49 TFEU — Freedom of movement and freedom of establishment — Assessment of the equivalence of the relevant training — Article 4(3) TEU — Principle of sincere cooperation between Member States — Conditions on the basis of which the host Member State may challenge the level of knowledge and qualifications attested to by a diploma issued in another Member State)cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23148Case C-572/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Köln — Germany) — ACC Silicones Ltd v Bundeszentralamt für Steuern (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of capital — Dividends from ‘free-float’ shares — Reimbursement of tax on income from capital paid by a non-resident company — Conditions — Free movement of capital — Principle of proportionality)cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23149Case C-520/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Silistra, Bulgaria) — DB, LY v Nachalnik na Rayonno upravlenie Silistra pri Oblastna direktsia na Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti — Silistra (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) — Decision 2007/533/JHA — Articles 38 and 39 — Alert on an object sought — Objectives of the alert — Seizure or use as evidence in criminal proceedings — Execution — Measures to be taken and action based on an alert — Surrender of the object seized to the Member State issuing the alert — National legislation not permitting a refusal to execute the alert)cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23150Case C-328/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 June 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Austria (Failure to fulfil obligations — Coordination of social security systems — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Articles 4, 7 and 67 — Freedom of movement for workers — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7 — Equal treatment — Family benefits — Social and tax advantages — Adjustment of amounts on the basis of price levels in the children’s State of residence)cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23151Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corp. and Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corp. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Optical disk drives – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 – Single and continuous infringement – Definition – Collusive agreements relating to procurement events concerning optical disk drives for notebook and desktop computers organised by two computer manufacturers.#Case C-700/19 P.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23152Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corp. and Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corp. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Optical disk drives – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 – Single and continuous infringement – Definition – Collusive agreements relating to procurement events concerning optical disk drives for notebook and desktop computers organised by two computer manufacturers.#Case C-700/19 P.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23153Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#Quanta Storage, Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Optical disk drives – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 – Single and continuous infringement – Definition – Collusive agreements relating to procurement events concerning optical disk drives for notebook and desktop computers organised by two computer manufacturers.#Case C-699/19 P.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23154Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#Quanta Storage, Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Optical disk drives – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 – Single and continuous infringement – Definition – Collusive agreements relating to procurement events concerning optical disk drives for notebook and desktop computers organised by two computer manufacturers.#Case C-699/19 P.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23155Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#Sony Optiarc, Inc and Sony Optiarc America, Inc v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Optical disk drives – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 – Single and continuous infringement – Definition – Collusive agreements relating to procurement events concerning optical disk drives for notebook and desktop computers organised by two computer manufacturers.#Case C-698/19 P.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23156Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#Sony Optiarc, Inc and Sony Optiarc America, Inc v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Optical disk drives – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 – Single and continuous infringement – Definition – Collusive agreements relating to procurement events concerning optical disk drives for notebook and desktop computers organised by two computer manufacturers.#Case C-698/19 P.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23157Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics, Inc v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Optical disk drives – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 – Single and continuous infringement – Definition – Collusive agreements relating to procurement events concerning optical disk drives for notebook and desktop computers organised by two computer manufacturers.#Case C-697/19 P.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23158Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics, Inc v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Optical disk drives – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 – Single and continuous infringement – Definition – Collusive agreements relating to procurement events concerning optical disk drives for notebook and desktop computers organised by two computer manufacturers.#Case C-697/19 P.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23159Case C-700/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022 — Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corp., Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corp. v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Optical disk drives — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 — Single and continuous infringement — Definition — Collusive agreements relating to procurement events concerning optical disk drives for notebook and desktop computers organised by two computer manufacturers)cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23160Case C-699/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022 — Quanta Storage Inc. v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Optical disk drives — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 — Single and continuous infringement — Definition — Collusive agreements relating to procurement events concerning optical disk drives for notebook and desktop computers organised by two computer manufacturers)cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022