23081Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 21 June 2022.#European Commission v Anthony Braesch and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Restructuring aid – Banking sector – Preliminary examination stage – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Restructuring plan – Commitments given by the Member State concerned – Burden-sharing measures – Conversion of subordinated debts into equity – Bondholders – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Locus standi – Natural or legal person directly and individually concerned – Breach of the procedural rights of interested parties – Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Article 108(2) TFEU – Concept of ‘parties concerned’ – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1(h) – Concept of ‘interested party’ – National measures taken into account by the European Commission – Inadmissibility of the action.#Case C-284/21 P.cjeu_case · 21 juin 2022
23082Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 21 June 2022.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v C and B and X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State and Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats 's-Hertogenbosch.#References for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Detention of third-country nationals – Fundamental right to liberty – Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Conditions governing the lawfulness of detention – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 15 – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 9 – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 28 – Review of the lawfulness of detention and of the continuation of a detention measure – Ex officio review – Fundamental right to an effective judicial remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Joined Cases C-704/20 and C-39/21.cjeu_case · 21 juin 2022
23083Case T-773/19: Order of the General Court of 21 June 2022 — BAE Systems v Commissioncjeu_case · 21 juin 2022
23084Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 June 2022.#Ligue des droits humains ASBL v Conseil des ministres.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data – Passenger Name Record (PNR) data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 2(2)(d) – Scope – Directive (EU) 2016/681 – Use of PNR data of air passengers of flights operated between the European Union and third countries – Power to include data of air passengers of flights operated within the European Union – Automated processing of those data – Retention period – Fight against terrorist offences and serious crime – Validity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8 and 21 as well as Article 52(1) – National legislation extending the application of the PNR system to other transport operations within the European Union – Freedom of movement within the European Union – Charter of Fundamental Rights – Article 45.#Case C-817/19.cjeu_case · 21 juin 2022
23085Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 June 2022.#Ligue des droits humains ASBL v Conseil des ministres.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data – Passenger Name Record (PNR) data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 2(2)(d) – Scope – Directive (EU) 2016/681 – Use of PNR data of air passengers of flights operated between the European Union and third countries – Power to include data of air passengers of flights operated within the European Union – Automated processing of those data – Retention period – Fight against terrorist offences and serious crime – Validity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8 and 21 as well as Article 52(1) – National legislation extending the application of the PNR system to other transport operations within the European Union – Freedom of movement within the European Union – Charter of Fundamental Rights – Article 45.#Case C-817/19.cjeu_case · 21 juin 2022
23086Case C-817/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle — Belgium) — Ligue des droits humains v Conseil des ministres (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Processing of personal data — Passenger Name Records (PNR) — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Article 2(2)(d) — Scope — Directive (EU) 2016/681 — Use of PNR data of air passengers of flights operated between the European Union and third countries — Power to include data of air passengers of flights operated within the European Union — Automated processing of that data — Retention period — Fight against terrorist offences and serious crime — Validity — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 7, 8 and 21 as well as Article 52(1) — National legislation extending the application of the PNR system to other transport operations within the European Union — Freedom of movement within the European Union — Charter of Fundamental Rights — Article 45)cjeu_case · 21 juin 2022
23087Case C-415/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 20 June 2022 — JD v Acerta — Caisse d’assurances sociales ASBL, Institut national d’assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants (Inasti), Belgian Statecjeu_case · 20 juin 2022
23088Case C-408/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 20 June 2022 — Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance v Bricolage Investissement France SAcjeu_case · 20 juin 2022
23089Case C-407/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 20 June 2022 — Ministre de l’Economie, des Finances et de la Relance v Manitou BF SAcjeu_case · 20 juin 2022
23090Case C-406/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně (Czech Republic) lodged on 20 June 2022 — CV v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politikycjeu_case · 20 juin 2022
23091Case C-402/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 20 June 2022 — Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid; Other party: M.A.cjeu_case · 20 juin 2022
23092Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 June 2022.#Natixis v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Preliminary issue – Lack of representation by a lawyer authorised to practise solely before the courts or tribunals of the United Kingdom in one of the situations exhaustively provided for by Article 91(2) of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union and from Euratom – Lack of representation by a lawyer authorised to practise before the courts or tribunals of a Member State or of another State which is a party to the EEA Agreement – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union.#Case T-449/21.cjeu_case · 20 juin 2022
23093Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 June 2022.#Natixis v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Preliminary issue – Lack of representation by a lawyer authorised to practise solely before the courts or tribunals of the United Kingdom in one of the situations exhaustively provided for by Article 91(2) of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union and from Euratom – Lack of representation by a lawyer authorised to practise before the courts or tribunals of a Member State or of another State which is a party to the EEA Agreement – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union.#Case T-449/21.cjeu_case · 20 juin 2022
23094Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 June 2022.#London Steam-Ship Owners’ Mutual Insurance Association Limited v Kingdom of Spain.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Recognition of a judgment given in another Member State – Grounds for non-recognition – Article 34(3) – Judgment irreconcilable with a judgment given in a dispute between the same parties in the Member State in which recognition is sought – Conditions – Whether the prior judgment entered in the terms of an arbitral award complies with the provisions and fundamental objectives of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Article 34(1) – Recognition manifestly contrary to public policy in the Member State in which recognition is sought – Conditions.#Case C-700/20.cjeu_case · 20 juin 2022
23095Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 June 2022.#London Steam-Ship Owners’ Mutual Insurance Association Limited v Kingdom of Spain.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Recognition of a judgment given in another Member State – Grounds for non-recognition – Article 34(3) – Judgment irreconcilable with a judgment given in a dispute between the same parties in the Member State in which recognition is sought – Conditions – Whether the prior judgment entered in the terms of an arbitral award complies with the provisions and fundamental objectives of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Article 34(1) – Recognition manifestly contrary to public policy in the Member State in which recognition is sought – Conditions.#Case C-700/20.cjeu_case · 20 juin 2022
23096Case C-700/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court) — United Kingdom) — London Steam-Ship Owners’ Mutual Insurance Association Limited v Kingdom of Spain (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Recognition of a judgment given in another Member State — Grounds for non-recognition — Article 34(3) — Judgment irreconcilable with a judgment given in a dispute between the same parties in the Member State in which recognition is sought — Conditions — Whether the prior judgment entered in the terms of an arbitral award complies with the provisions and fundamental objectives of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Article 34(1) — Recognition manifestly contrary to public policy in the Member State in which recognition is sought — Conditions)cjeu_case · 20 juin 2022