Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
22707

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 12 July 2022.#Cipla Europe NV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Intervention – EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – Leave for other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to participate in the proceedings in the case before the General Court – Time limits – Unforeseeable circumstances – Participation in the oral proceedings – Rejection.#Case C-245/22 P(I).

cjeu_case ·
22708

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 12 July 2022.#Cipla Europe NV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Intervention – EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – Leave for other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to participate in the proceedings in the case before the General Court – Time limits – Unforeseeable circumstances – Participation in the oral proceedings – Rejection.#Case C-245/22 P(I).

cjeu_case ·
22717

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 July 2022.#W O and J L v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Surrender procedure between Member States – Conditions for execution – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Systemic or generalised deficiencies – Two-step examination – Criteria for application – Obligation of the executing judicial authority to determine, specifically and precisely, whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the person in respect of whom a European arrest warrant has been issued, if surrendered, runs a real risk of breach of his or her fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law.#Case C-480/21.

cjeu_case ·
22718

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 July 2022.#W O and J L v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Surrender procedure between Member States – Conditions for execution – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Systemic or generalised deficiencies – Two-step examination – Criteria for application – Obligation of the executing judicial authority to determine, specifically and precisely, whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the person in respect of whom a European arrest warrant has been issued, if surrendered, runs a real risk of breach of his or her fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law.#Case C-480/21.

cjeu_case ·
22719

Case C-480/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 July 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court — Ireland) — Execution of European arrest warrants issued against W O, J L (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(3) — Surrender procedure between Member States — Conditions for execution — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Second paragraph of Article 47 — Fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law — Systemic or generalised deficiencies — Two-step examination — Criteria for application — Obligation of the executing judicial authority to determine, specifically and precisely, whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the person in respect of whom a European arrest warrant has been issued, if surrendered, runs a real risk of breach of his or her fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law)

cjeu_case ·
22720

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 12 July 2022.#Nord Stream 2 AG v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Energy – Internal market in natural gas – Directive 2009/73/EC – Directive (EU) 2019/692 – Extension of the application of Directive 2009/73 to gas lines between Member States and third countries – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment – Condition that an applicant must be directly concerned by the measure that forms the subject matter of its action – Lack of discretion as to the obligations imposed on the appellant – Condition that an applicant must be individually concerned by the measure that forms the subject matter of its action – Arrangements for the exemptions and derogations excluding the appellant as the sole operator from their benefit – Request that documents be removed from the case file – Rules on the production of evidence before the EU Courts – Documents internal to the European Union institutions.#Case C-348/20 P.

cjeu_case ·