Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

22621

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 14 July 2022.#European Commission v Servier SAS and Others.#Appeal – Competition – Pharmaceutical products – Market for perindopril – Article 101 TFEU – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market sharing – Potential competition – Restriction of competition by object – Strategy to delay the market entry of generic versions of perindopril – Patent dispute settlement agreement – Patent licence agreement – Technology assignment and licence agreement – Article 102 TFEU – Relevant market – Abuse of dominant position.#Case C-176/19 P.

cjeu_case · 14 juillet 2022

22622

Case C-743/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2022 — European Parliament v Council of the European Union (Action for annulment — Law governing the institutions — Bodies, offices and agencies of the European Union — European Labour Authority (ELA) — Competence to determine the location of the seat — Article 341 TFEU — Scope — Decision adopted by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States in the margins of a Council meeting — Jurisdiction of the Court under Article 263 TFEU — Author and legal nature of the act — Absence of binding effects in the EU legal order)

cjeu_case · 14 juillet 2022

22623

Joined Cases C-106/19 and C-232/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2022 — Italian Republic (C-106/19), Comune di Milano (C-232/19) v Council of the European Union, European Parliament (Action for annulment — Law governing the institutions — Regulation (EU) 2018/1718 — Location of the seat of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in Amsterdam (Netherlands) — Article 263 TFEU — Admissibility — Interest in bringing proceedings — Locus standi — Direct and individual concern — Decision adopted by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States in the margins of a Council meeting in order to determine the location of the seat of an EU agency — Absence of binding effects in the EU legal order — Prerogatives of the European Parliament)

cjeu_case · 14 juillet 2022

22624

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#Italian Republic and Comune di Milano v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Law governing the institutions – EU bodies, offices and agencies – European Medicines Agency (EMA) – Competence to determine the location of the seat – Article 341 TFEU – Scope – Decision adopted by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States in the margins of a Council meeting – Jurisdiction of the Court under Article 263 TFEU – Author and legal nature of the act – Absence of binding effects in the EU legal order.#Joined Cases C-59/18 and C-182/18.

cjeu_case · 14 juillet 2022

22625

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#Italian Republic and Comune di Milano v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Law governing the institutions – EU bodies, offices and agencies – European Medicines Agency (EMA) – Competence to determine the location of the seat – Article 341 TFEU – Scope – Decision adopted by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States in the margins of a Council meeting – Jurisdiction of the Court under Article 263 TFEU – Author and legal nature of the act – Absence of binding effects in the EU legal order.#Joined Cases C-59/18 and C-182/18.

cjeu_case · 14 juillet 2022

22626

Joined Cases C-59/18 and C-182/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2022 — Italian Republic, Comune di Milano v Council of the European Union (Action for annulment — Law governing the institutions — EU bodies, offices and agencies — European Medicines Agency (EMA) — Competence to determine the location of the seat — Article 341 TFEU — Scope — Decision adopted by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States in the margins of a Council meeting — Jurisdiction of the Court under Article 263 TFEU — Author and legal nature of the act — Absence of binding effects in the EU legal order)

cjeu_case · 14 juillet 2022

22627

Case T-438/22: Action brought on 13 July 2022 — International British Education XXI v EUIPO — Saint George’s School (IBE ST. GEORGE’S)

cjeu_case · 13 juillet 2022

22628

Case T-40/22: Order of the General Court of 13 July 2022 — Dado Ceramica and Others v EUIPO — Italcer (Tiles)

cjeu_case · 13 juillet 2022

22629

Case C-471/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Bulgaria) lodged on 13 July 2022 — Agentsia ‘Patna infrastruktura’ v Rakovoditel na upravlyavashtia organ na operativna programa ‘Transport’ 2007-2013 i direktor na direktsia ‘Koordinatsia na programi i proekti’ v Ministerstvoto na transporta

cjeu_case · 13 juillet 2022

22630

Case C-468/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsialisiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 13 July 2022 — Criminal proceedings against VB

cjeu_case · 13 juillet 2022

22631

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#TL v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Appraisal report for 2019 – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Setting of objectives – Misuse of powers – Liability.#Case T-677/21.

cjeu_case · 13 juillet 2022

22632

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#TL v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Appraisal report for 2019 – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Setting of objectives – Misuse of powers – Liability.#Case T-677/21.

cjeu_case · 13 juillet 2022

22633

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#dennree GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for registration of the EU figurative mark BioMarkt – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-641/21.

cjeu_case · 13 juillet 2022

22634

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#dennree GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for registration of the EU figurative mark BioMarkt – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-641/21.

cjeu_case · 13 juillet 2022

22635

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#Rimini Street, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark WE DO SUPPORT – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-634/21.

cjeu_case · 13 juillet 2022

22636

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#Rimini Street, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark WE DO SUPPORT – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-634/21.

cjeu_case · 13 juillet 2022

22637

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#Brand Energy Holdings BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark RAPIDGUARD – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Right to be heard.#Case T-573/21.

cjeu_case · 13 juillet 2022

22638

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#Brand Energy Holdings BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark RAPIDGUARD – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Right to be heard.#Case T-573/21.

cjeu_case · 13 juillet 2022

22639

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#Purasac Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Rejeunesse – Earlier EU word mark REVANESSE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-543/21.

cjeu_case · 13 juillet 2022

22640

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 July 2022.#Purasac Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Rejeunesse – Earlier EU word mark REVANESSE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-543/21.

cjeu_case · 13 juillet 2022