22381Case C-517/22 P: Appeal brought on 2 August 2022 by Eurobolt BV, Fabory Nederland BV, ASF Fischer BV against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 18 May 2022 in Case T-479/20, Eurobolt and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 2 août 2022
22382Case T-622/21: Order of the General Court of 2 August 2022 — Puma v EUIPO — SMB Swisspour (PUMA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 2 août 2022
22383Case T-592/21: Order of the General Court of 2 August 2022 — Kakuzo v EUIPO — Rauch Fruchtsäfte (Kakuzo) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 2 août 2022
22384Case T-477/22: Action brought on 1 August 2022 — Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Otherscjeu_case · 1 août 2022
22385Case T-475/22: Action brought on 1 August 2022 — Fundación Pedro Barrié de la Maza, Conde de Fenosa v Commission and Otherscjeu_case · 1 août 2022
22386Case T-474/22: Action brought on 1 August 2022 — Imasa, Ingeniería y Proyectos v Commission and Otherscjeu_case · 1 août 2022
22387Order of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Soudal NV and Esko-Graphics BVBA v Magnetrol International NV and European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium – Admission of interventions in appeal proceedings against a judgment of the General Court – Annulment of the decision of the General Court – Referral of the case back to the General Court – Decision of the General Court refusing to place on the case file written observations on the judgment effecting that referral lodged by an intervener in the appeal – Implied decision of the General Court refusing to grant an intervener in the appeal the status of intervener before the General Court – Admissibility of the appeal – Status of intervener before the General Court of an intervener in the appeal – Appeal brought out of time – Excusable error.#Case C-74/22 P(I).cjeu_case · 1 août 2022
22388Order of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Soudal NV and Esko-Graphics BVBA v Magnetrol International NV and European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium – Admission of interventions in appeal proceedings against a judgment of the General Court – Annulment of the decision of the General Court – Referral of the case back to the General Court – Decision of the General Court refusing to place on the case file written observations on the judgment effecting that referral lodged by an intervener in the appeal – Implied decision of the General Court refusing to grant an intervener in the appeal the status of intervener before the General Court – Admissibility of the appeal – Status of intervener before the General Court of an intervener in the appeal – Appeal brought out of time – Excusable error.#Case C-74/22 P(I).cjeu_case · 1 août 2022
22389Order of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA/NV and Ampar BVBA v Magnetrol International NV and European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium – Admission of interventions in appeal proceedings against a judgment of the General Court – Annulment of the decision of the General Court – Referral of the case back to the General Court – Decision of the General Court refusing to place on the case file written observations on the judgment effecting that referral lodged by an intervener in the appeal – Implied decision of the General Court refusing to grant an intervener in the appeal the status of intervener before the General Court – Admissibility of the appeal – Status of intervener before the General Court of an intervener in the appeal.#Case C-32/22 P(I).cjeu_case · 1 août 2022
22390Order of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Anheuser-Busch Inbev and Ampar v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium – Admission of interventions in appeal proceedings against a judgment of the General Court – Annulment of the decision of the General Court – Referral of the case back to the General Court – Decision of the General Court refusing to place on the case file written observations on the judgment effecting that referral lodged by an intervener in the appeal – Implied decision of the General Court refusing to grant an intervener in the appeal the status of intervener before the General Court – Admissibility of the appeal – Status of intervener before the General Court of an intervener in the appeal.#Case C-32/22 P(I).cjeu_case · 1 août 2022
22391Order of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Atlas Copco Airpower and Atlas Copco AB v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium – Admission of interventions in appeal proceedings against a judgment of the General Court – Annulment of the decision of the General Court – Referral of the case back to the General Court – Decision of the General Court refusing to place on the case file written observations on the judgment effecting that referral lodged by an intervener in the appeal – Implied decision of the General Court refusing to grant an intervener in the appeal the status of intervener before the General Court – Admissibility of the appeal – Status of intervener before the General Court of an intervener in the appeal.#Case C-31/22 P(I).cjeu_case · 1 août 2022
22392Order of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Atlas Copco Airpower and Atlas Copco AB v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium – Admission of interventions in appeal proceedings against a judgment of the General Court – Annulment of the decision of the General Court – Referral of the case back to the General Court – Decision of the General Court refusing to place on the case file written observations on the judgment effecting that referral lodged by an intervener in the appeal – Implied decision of the General Court refusing to grant an intervener in the appeal the status of intervener before the General Court – Admissibility of the appeal – Status of intervener before the General Court of an intervener in the appeal.#Case C-31/22 P(I).cjeu_case · 1 août 2022
22393Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Criminal proceedings against TL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2010/64/EU – Right to interpretation and translation – Article 2(1) and Article 3(1) – Concept of an ‘essential document’ – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Article 3(1)(d) – Scope – Not implemented in domestic law – Direct effect – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 and Article 48(2) – European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – Article 6 – Suspended prison sentence with probation – Breach of the probation conditions – Failure to translate an essential document and absence of an interpreter when that document was being drawn up – Revocation of the suspension of the prison sentence – Failure to translate the procedural acts relating to that revocation – Consequences for the validity of that revocation – Procedural defect resulting in relative nullity.#Case C-242/22 PPU.cjeu_case · 1 août 2022
22394Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Criminal proceedings against TL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Évora.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2010/64/EU – Right to interpretation and translation – Article 2(1) and Article 3(1) – Concept of an ‘essential document’ – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Article 3(1)(d) – Scope – Not implemented in domestic law – Direct effect – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 and Article 48(2) – European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – Article 6 – Suspended prison sentence with probation – Breach of the probation conditions – Failure to translate an essential document and absence of an interpreter when that document was being drawn up – Revocation of the suspension of the prison sentence – Failure to translate the procedural acts relating to that revocation – Consequences for the validity of that revocation – Procedural defect resulting in relative nullity.#Case C-242/22 PPU.cjeu_case · 1 août 2022
22395Case C-242/22 PPU: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 August 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Évora — Portugal) — Criminal proceedings against TL (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2010/64/EU — Right to interpretation and translation — Article 2(1) and Article 3(1) — Concept of an ‘essential document’ — Directive 2012/13/EU — Right to information in criminal proceedings — Article 3(1)(d) — Scope — Not implemented in domestic law — Direct effect — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 and Article 48(2) — European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms — Article 6 — Suspended prison sentence with probation — Breach of the probation conditions — Failure to translate an essential document and absence of an interpreter when that document was being drawn up — Revocation of the suspension of the prison sentence — Failure to translate the procedural acts relating to that revocation — Consequences for the validity of that revocation — Procedural defect resulting in relative nullity)cjeu_case · 1 août 2022
22396Case T-742/21: Order of the General Court of 1 August 2022 — Preventicus v EUIPO (NIGHTWATCH) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 1 août 2022
22397Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Petrus Kerstens v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil Service – Disciplinary proceedings – Requests for assistance – Rejection – Notification of decisions by electronic means – Action for annulment – Period allowed for commencing proceedings – Point from which time starts to run – Action brought out of time.#Case C-447/21 P.cjeu_case · 1 août 2022
22398Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Petrus Kerstens v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil Service – Disciplinary proceedings – Requests for assistance – Rejection – Notification of decisions by electronic means – Action for annulment – Period allowed for commencing proceedings – Point from which time starts to run – Action brought out of time.#Case C-447/21 P.cjeu_case · 1 août 2022
22399Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Ministero dell'Interno v TO.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Applicants for international protection – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 20(4) and (5) – Seriously violent behaviour – Member States’ right to determine the sanctions applicable – Scope – Withdrawal of material reception conditions.#Case C-422/21.cjeu_case · 1 août 2022
22400Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Ministero dell'Interno v TO.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Applicants for international protection – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 20(4) and (5) – Seriously violent behaviour – Member States’ right to determine the sanctions applicable – Scope – Withdrawal of material reception conditions.#Case C-422/21.cjeu_case · 1 août 2022