Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
22041

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2022.#Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TRAUMGEL – Earlier EU word mark Traumeel – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-130/22.

cjeu_case ·
22042

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2022.#Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TRAUMGEL – Earlier EU word mark Traumeel – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-130/22.

cjeu_case ·
22044

Case T-130/22: Order of the General Court of 12 September 2022 — Biologische Heilmittel Heel v EUIPO — Esi (TRAUMGEL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark TRAUMGEL — Earlier EU word mark Traumeel — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
22057

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#VP v KS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 – Taking of evidence – Written evidence of a person residing in a Member State other than the Member State of the court having jurisdiction – Possibility of having recourse to the means of taking evidence provided for by national law and not to that provided for by that regulation.#Case C-188/22.

cjeu_case ·
22058

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#VP v KS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Opolu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 – Taking of evidence – Written evidence of a person residing in a Member State other than the Member State of the court having jurisdiction – Possibility of having recourse to the means of taking evidence provided for by national law and not to that provided for by that regulation.#Case C-188/22.

cjeu_case ·
22059

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#PL v État belge.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-56/22.

cjeu_case ·
22060

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#PL v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-56/22.

cjeu_case ·