Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
21601

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 6 October 2022.#Colt Technology Services SpA and Others v Ministero della Giustizia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directive (EU) 2018/1972 – Article 13 – Conditions attached to the general authorisation – Annex I, Part A, point 4 – Enabling of legal interception by competent national authorities – Article 3 – General objectives – National legislation on the reimbursement of costs associated with interception activities that telecommunications operators are ordered by the judicial authorities to carry out – Absence of full reimbursement mechanism – Principles of non-discrimination, proportionality and transparency.#Case C-339/21.

cjeu_case ·
21602

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 6 October 2022.#UI v Österreichische Post AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 82(1) – Right to compensation for damage caused by data processing that infringes that regulation – Conditions governing the right to compensation – Mere infringement of that regulation not sufficient – Need for damage caused by that infringement – Compensation for non-material damage resulting from such processing – Incompatibility of a national rule making compensation for such damage subject to the exceeding of a threshold of seriousness – Rules for the determination of damages by national courts.#Case C-300/21.

cjeu_case ·
21603

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 6 October 2022.#Norra Stockholm Bygg AB v Per Nycander AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 6(3) and (4) – Lawfulness of processing – Production of a document containing personal data in civil court proceedings – Article 23(1)(f) and (j) – Protection of judicial independence and judicial proceedings – Enforcement of civil law claims – Requirements to be complied with – Having regard to the interests of the data subjects – Balancing of the opposing interests involved – Article 5 – Minimisation of personal data – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 7 – Right to respect for private life – Article 8 – Right to protection of personal data – Article 47 – Right to effective judicial protection – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-268/21.

cjeu_case ·
21605

Case C-673/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 October 2022 — KN v European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) (Appeal — Institutional law — European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) — Code of Conduct — Allegations of psychological harassment against a member of the EESC — Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) — Decision to relieve the member of his supervisory and personnel management functions — Action for annulment and compensation)

cjeu_case ·
21606

Case C-436/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — flightright GmbH v American Airlines Inc. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 3(1)(a) — Scope — Article 2(f) to (h) — Concept of ‘ticket’ — Concept of ‘reservation’ — Concept of ‘connecting flight’ — Reservation through a travel agency — Article 7 — Compensation for air passengers in the event of a long delay to a flight — Transport operation consisting of a number of flights operated by separate operating air carriers — Connecting flight departing from an airport located in a Member State with a stop in Switzerland and final destination in a third country)

cjeu_case ·
21607

Joined Cases C-433/21 and C-434/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Agenzia delle Entrate v Contship Italia SpA (References for a preliminary ruling — Direct taxation — Freedom of establishment — Corporate income tax — Measures to prevent tax avoidance by shell companies — Determination of taxable income on the basis of presumed minimum income — Exclusion from the scope of those measures of companies and entities listed on national regulated markets)

cjeu_case ·
21608

Case C-293/21: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — UAB ‘Vittamed technologijos’, in liquidation v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Deductions of input VAT — Goods and services used by the taxable person to produce capital goods — Articles 184 to 187 — Adjustment of deductions — Obligation to adjust deductions of VAT in the event of that taxable person being placed in liquidation and removed from the register of VAT payers)

cjeu_case ·
21609

Case C-266/21: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad — Bulgaria) — criminal procedure against HV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common transport policy — Directive 2006/126/EC — Article 11(2) and (4) — Suspension of the right to drive a motor vehicle — Driving licence issued by the Member State of normal residence in exchange for a driving licence issued by another Member State — Refusal by the first Member State to enforce a decision suspending the right to drive adopted by the second Member State — Obligation for the second Member State not to recognise, in its territory, the validity of the driving licence that has been suspended)

cjeu_case ·
21610

Case C-250/21: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Szef Krajowej Administracji Skarbowej v O. Fundusz Inwestycyjny Zamknięty reprezentowany przez O S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Supply of services for consideration — Exemptions — Article 135(1)(b) — Granting of credit — Sub-participation agreement)

cjeu_case ·
21611

Case C-241/21: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 6 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus — Estonia) — I.L. v Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2008/115/EC — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Article 15(1) — Detention — Grounds for detention — General criterion based on the risk that the effective enforcement of the removal would be compromised — Risk that the person concerned would commit a criminal offence — Consequences of the establishment of the offence and the imposition of a penalty — Complication of the removal process — Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Restriction of the fundamental right to liberty — Requirement of a legal basis — Requirements of clarity, predictability and accessibility — Protection against arbitrariness)

cjeu_case ·
21615

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#FZ and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – European Commission staff posted to a third country – Updating of the correction coefficients – Repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court of the European Union – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-172/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
21616

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#FZ and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – European Commission staff posted to a third country – Updating of the correction coefficients – Repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court of the European Union – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-172/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
21617

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#FJ and Others v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – European External Action Service (EEAS) staff – Updating of the correction coefficients – Repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court of the European Union – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-171/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
21618

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#FJ and Others v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – European External Action Service (EEAS) staff – Updating of the correction coefficients – Repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court of the European Union – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-171/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
21619

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#FJ and Others v European External Action Service (EEAS).#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – European External Action Service (EEAS) – Updating of the correction coefficients – Repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court of the European Union – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-170/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
21620

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#FJ and Others v European External Action Service (EEAS).#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – European External Action Service (EEAS) – Updating of the correction coefficients – Repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court of the European Union – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-170/22 P.

cjeu_case ·