21521Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#Associação do Socorro e Amparo v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark quis ut Deus – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-752/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21522Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#Associação do Socorro e Amparo v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark quis ut Deus – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-752/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21523Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#H/2 Credit Manager LP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark H/2 CAPITAL PARTNERS – Earlier EU figurative mark HCapital – Relative ground for refusal – Relevant public – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-656/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21524Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#H/2 Credit Manager LP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark H/2 CAPITAL PARTNERS – Earlier EU figurative mark HCapital – Relative ground for refusal – Relevant public – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-656/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21525Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#L. Oliva Torras, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a coupling for connecting refrigeration or air-conditioning equipment to a motor vehicle – Grounds for invalidity – Novelty – Individual character – Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Scope of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Earlier design produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Article 28(1)(b)(i), (v) and (vi) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002.#Case T-652/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21526Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#L. Oliva Torras, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a coupling for connecting refrigeration or air-conditioning equipment to a motor vehicle – Grounds for invalidity – Novelty – Individual character – Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Scope of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Earlier design produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Article 28(1)(b)(i), (v) and (vi) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002.#Case T-652/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21527Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#María Teresa Serrano Velázquez v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Petitions Committee of the Parliament – Petition concerning the infringement by the Spanish authorities of EU law in the field of fundamental rights – Decision to dismiss the petition – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-589/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21528Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#María Teresa Serrano Velázquez v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Petitions Committee of the Parliament – Petition concerning the infringement by the Spanish authorities of EU law in the field of fundamental rights – Decision to dismiss the petition – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-589/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21529Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 October 2022 (Extracts).#Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Commission correspondence with AstraZeneca and the German authorities concerning the quantity of COVID-19 vaccines and their delivery times – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Documents having been produced in the context of court proceedings that were closed at the time of adoption of the decision refusing access to those documents – Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual – Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests of a third party.#Case T-524/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21530Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 October 2022 (Extracts).#Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Commission correspondence with AstraZeneca and the German authorities concerning the quantity of COVID-19 vaccines and their delivery times – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Documents having been produced in the context of court proceedings that were closed at the time of adoption of the decision refusing access to those documents – Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual – Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests of a third party.#Case T-524/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21531Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#Ángel Vasallo Andrés v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Petitions Committee of the Parliament – Petition concerning the disciplinary regime for public employees in Spain – Question not coming within the scope of activity of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – Conflict of interest – Effect of posting the status of a petition on the Parliament’s Internet petitions portal.#Case T-496/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21532Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#Ángel Vasallo Andrés v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Petitions Committee of the Parliament – Petition concerning the disciplinary regime for public employees in Spain – Question not coming within the scope of activity of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – Conflict of interest – Effect of posting the status of a petition on the Parliament’s Internet petitions portal.#Case T-496/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21533Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#MCO (IP) Holdings Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-461/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21534Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#MCO (IP) Holdings Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for European Union figurative mark C2 CYPRUS CASINOS – Earlier national figurative mark C8 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Interdependence of factors – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-460/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21535Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#MCO (IP) Holdings Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for European Union figurative mark C2 CYPRUS CASINOS – Earlier national figurative mark C8 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Interdependence of factors – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-460/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21536Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 October 2022 (Extracts).#Shopify Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – EU figurative mark Shoppi – Earlier EU word mark SHOPIFY – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom (Brexit).#Case T-222/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21537Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 October 2022 (Extracts).#Shopify Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – EU figurative mark Shoppi – Earlier EU word mark SHOPIFY – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom (Brexit).#Case T-222/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21538Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 October 2022 (Extracts).#Sandra Paesen v European External Action Service.#Civil service – Official – EEAS staff posted to a third country – Head of delegation – Management trial period – Final assessment report for the management trial period – Act not having an adverse effect – Inadmissibility – Reassignment to a non-management post at EEAS headquarters – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Conditions for application to heads of delegation of Article 11 of Commission Decision C(2008) 5028/2 of 9 September 2008 on middle management staff – Non-inclusion of documents in the personnel file – Interests of the service – Misuse of powers – Request for assistance – Decision rejecting the request – Liability.#Case T-88/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21539Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 October 2022 (Extracts).#Sandra Paesen v European External Action Service.#Civil service – Official – EEAS staff posted to a third country – Head of delegation – Management trial period – Final assessment report for the management trial period – Act not having an adverse effect – Inadmissibility – Reassignment to a non-management post at EEAS headquarters – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Conditions for application to heads of delegation of Article 11 of Commission Decision C(2008) 5028/2 of 9 September 2008 on middle management staff – Non-inclusion of documents in the personnel file – Interests of the service – Misuse of powers – Request for assistance – Decision rejecting the request – Liability.#Case T-88/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022
21540Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#Ivo Van Walle v European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – ECDC staff members – Decision not to renew a contract – Manifest error of assessment – Misuse of powers – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Right to be heard – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case T-83/21.cjeu_case · 12 octobre 2022