Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
21282

Order of the Court of 20 October 2022.#Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-446/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
21283

Order of the Court of 20 October 2022.#Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-446/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
21284

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Carlos Correia de Matos v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 – Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Institutional law – Decision of the European Commission rejecting the applicant’s complaint concerning an alleged breach of Article 267 TFEU by the Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court, Portugal) – Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party – Appeal clearly inadmissible.#Case C-79/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
21285

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Carlos Correia de Matos v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 – Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Institutional law – Decision of the European Commission rejecting the applicant’s complaint concerning an alleged breach of Article 267 TFEU by the Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court, Portugal) – Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party – Appeal clearly inadmissible.#Case C-79/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
21289

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#James C. Callaway v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Common agricultural policy – Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species – Plant varieties – Producer of the hemp variety Finola – Areas cultivated in Poland – Hemp varieties eligible for financial support under the common agricultural policy – Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content – Authorisation given to Poland to prohibit the marketing of the Finola variety in its territory – Not directly concerned – Inadmissibility.#Case T-653/21.

cjeu_case ·
21290

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#James C. Callaway v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Common agricultural policy – Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species – Plant varieties – Producer of the hemp variety Finola – Areas cultivated in Poland – Hemp varieties eligible for financial support under the common agricultural policy – Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content – Authorisation given to Poland to prohibit the marketing of the Finola variety in its territory – Not directly concerned – Inadmissibility.#Case T-653/21.

cjeu_case ·
21293

Case T-653/21: Order of the General Court of 20 October 2022 — Callaway v Commission (Action for annulment — Common agricultural policy — Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Plant varieties — Producer of the hemp variety Finola — Areas cultivated in Poland — Hemp varieties eligible for financial support under the common agricultural policy — Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content — Authorisation given to Poland to prohibit the marketing of the Finola variety in its territory — Not directly concerned — Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
21295

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Ana Carla Mendes de Almeida v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Appointment of European Prosecutors – Appointment of one of the candidates nominated by the Portuguese Republic – Alleged infringement of the rules applicable to the appointment of European Prosecutors – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Point from which time starts to run – Out of time – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-576/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
21296

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Ana Carla Mendes de Almeida v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Appointment of European Prosecutors – Appointment of one of the candidates nominated by the Portuguese Republic – Alleged infringement of the rules applicable to the appointment of European Prosecutors – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Point from which time starts to run – Out of time – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-576/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
21297

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP) v AB and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Own resources of the European Union – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Proceedings relating to irregularities – Article 4 – Adoption of administrative measures – Article 3(1) – Limitation period for proceedings – Expiry – Whether it may be relied on in the context of the enforced recovery procedure – Article 3(2) – Period for implementation – Applicability – Starting point of the limitation period – Interruption and suspension.#Case C-374/21.

cjeu_case ·
21298

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP) v AB and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Own resources of the European Union – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Proceedings relating to irregularities – Article 4 – Adoption of administrative measures – Article 3(1) – Limitation period for proceedings – Expiry – Whether it may be relied on in the context of the enforced recovery procedure – Article 3(2) – Period for implementation – Applicability – Starting point of the limitation period – Interruption and suspension.#Case C-374/21.

cjeu_case ·
21299

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#UP v Centre public d’action sociale de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Immigration policy – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Asylum application – Rejection – Order to leave the territory – Article 6(4) – Application for leave to remain for the purpose of medical treatment – Admissible application – Issuance of temporary leave to remain while the application is being examined – Dismissal of application – Social assistance – Refusal – Condition relating to the legality of the stay – No return decision – Effect of temporary leave to remain on the order to leave the territory.#Case C-825/21.

cjeu_case ·
21300

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#UP v Centre public d’action sociale de Liège.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Immigration policy – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Asylum application – Rejection – Order to leave the territory – Article 6(4) – Application for leave to remain for the purpose of medical treatment – Admissible application – Issuance of temporary leave to remain while the application is being examined – Dismissal of application – Social assistance – Refusal – Condition relating to the legality of the stay – No return decision – Effect of temporary leave to remain on the order to leave the territory.#Case C-825/21.

cjeu_case ·