21241Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 October 2022.#DB Station & Service AG v ODEG Ostdeutsche Eisenbahn GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Directive 2001/14/EC – Access to railway infrastructure – Article 30 – Railway regulatory body – Review of infrastructure charges – National courts – Review of charges in the light of competition law – Division of competence between the regulatory authority and the national courts.#Case C-721/20.cjeu_case · 27 octobre 2022
21242Case C-721/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin — Germany) — DB Station & Service AG v ODEG Ostdeutsche Eisenbahn GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rail transport — Article 102 TFEU — Abuse of a dominant position — Directive 2001/14/EC — Access to railway infrastructure — Article 30 — Railway regulatory body — Review of infrastructure charges — National courts — Review of charges in the light of competition law — Division of competence between the regulatory authority and the national courts)cjeu_case · 27 octobre 2022
21243Rectification order of 27 October 2022.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SpaceNet AG and Telekom Deutschland GmbH.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Joined Cases C-793/19 and C-794/19.cjeu_case · 27 octobre 2022
21244Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 October 2022.#Gameageventures LLP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark GAME TOURNAMENTS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-776/21.cjeu_case · 26 octobre 2022
21245Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 October 2022.#Gameageventures LLP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark GAME TOURNAMENTS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-776/21.cjeu_case · 26 octobre 2022
21246Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 October 2022.#Sicilia Regionale Marittima SpA - Siremar v European Commission.#State aid – Maritime transport – Rescue aid – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid in part compatible and in part incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Service of general economic interest – Obligation to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan – Six-month time limit – Extension – Tax exemption – Advantage – Effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Length of proceedings – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-668/21.cjeu_case · 26 octobre 2022
21247Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 October 2022.#Sicilia Regionale Marittima SpA - Siremar v European Commission.#State aid – Maritime transport – Rescue aid – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid in part compatible and in part incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Service of general economic interest – Obligation to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan – Six-month time limit – Extension – Tax exemption – Advantage – Effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Length of proceedings – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-668/21.cjeu_case · 26 octobre 2022
21248Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 October 2022.#Lemken GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a shade of sky blue – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-621/21.cjeu_case · 26 octobre 2022
21249Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 October 2022.#Lemken GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a shade of sky blue – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-621/21.cjeu_case · 26 octobre 2022
21250Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 October 2022 (Extracts).#The Bazooka Companies, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a baby’s bottle – Genuine use of the mark – Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-273/21.cjeu_case · 26 octobre 2022
21251Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 October 2022 (Extracts).#The Bazooka Companies, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a baby’s bottle – Genuine use of the mark – Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-273/21.cjeu_case · 26 octobre 2022
21252Case T-776/21: Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2022 — Gameageventures v EUIPO — (GAME TOURNAMENTS) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark GAME TOURNAMENTS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Equal treatment — Principle of sound administration)cjeu_case · 26 octobre 2022
21253Case T-668/21: Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2022 — Siremar v Commission (State aid — Maritime transport — Rescue aid — Decision declaring the aid unlawful — Decision declaring the aid in part compatible and in part incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Service of general economic interest — Obligation to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan — Six-month time limit — Extension — Tax exemption — Advantage — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition — Length of proceedings — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty — Principle of sound administration)cjeu_case · 26 octobre 2022
21254Case T-621/21: Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2022 — Lemken v EUIPO (shade of sky blue) (EU trade mark — Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a shade of sky blue — Absolute grounds for refusal — No descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 26 octobre 2022
21255Case T-273/21: Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2022 — The Bazooka Companies v EUIPO — Bilkiewicz (Shape of a baby’s bottle) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a baby’s bottle — Genuine use of the mark — Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Nature of use of the mark — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 26 octobre 2022
21256Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 October 2022.#RegioJet a. s. v České dráhy a.s.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria relating to the constitution and function of that body – Exercise of judicial or administrative functions – Directive 2012/34/EU – Articles 55 and 56 – Single national regulatory body for the railway sector – Independent regulatory authority for the sector – Entitlement to act on an ex officio basis – Power to impose penalties – Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-104/21.cjeu_case · 26 octobre 2022
21257Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 October 2022.#RegioJet a. s. v České dráhy a.s.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Úřad pro přístup k dopravní infrastruktuře.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria relating to the constitution and function of that body – Exercise of judicial or administrative functions – Directive 2012/34/EU – Articles 55 and 56 – Single national regulatory body for the railway sector – Independent regulatory authority for the sector – Entitlement to act on an ex officio basis – Power to impose penalties – Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-104/21.cjeu_case · 26 octobre 2022
21258Case C-104/21, RegioJet: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Úřad pro přístup k dopravní infrastruktuře — Czech Republic) — RegioJet a.s. v České dráhy a.s. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 267 TFEU — Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ — Criteria relating to the constitution and function of that body — Exercise of judicial or administrative functions — Directive 2012/34/EU — Articles 55 and 56 — Single national regulatory body for the railway sector — Independent regulatory authority for the sector — Entitlement to act on an ex officio basis — Power to impose penalties — Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts — Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)cjeu_case · 26 octobre 2022
21259Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 October 2022.#Dmitry Vladimirovich Ovsyannikov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment.#Case T-714/20.cjeu_case · 26 octobre 2022
21260Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 October 2022.#Dmitry Vladimirovich Ovsyannikov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment.#Case T-714/20.cjeu_case · 26 octobre 2022