21121Case T-667/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 November 2022 — Ferriere Nord v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Fixing of prices — Limiting and controlling output and sales — Decision taken following the annulment of earlier decisions — New hearing held in the presence of the competition authorities of the Member States — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration — Reasonable period — Obligation to state reasons — Proportionality — Ne bis in idem principle — Plea of illegality — Evidence of involvement in the cartel — Aggravating circumstances — Repeated infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Equal treatment — Unlimited jurisdiction)cjeu_case · 9 novembre 2022
21122Case T-657/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 November 2022 — Feralpi v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Fixing of prices — Limiting and controlling output and sales — Decision taken following the annulment of earlier decisions — New hearing held in the presence of the competition authorities of the Member States — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration — Reasonable period — Obligation to state reasons — Proportionality — Ne bis in idem principle — Plea of illegality — single, complex and continuous infringement — Evidence of involvement in the cartel — Public distancing — Unlimited jurisdiction)cjeu_case · 9 novembre 2022
21123Case T-656/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 November 2022 — Alfa Acciai v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for reinforcing bars — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Fixing of prices — Limiting and controlling output and sales — Decision adopted following the annulment of earlier decisions — New hearing in the presence of the competition authorities of the Member States — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration — Reasonable period — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 9 novembre 2022
21124Case T-655/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 November 2022 — Ferriera Valsabbia and Valsabbia Investimenti v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Fixing of prices — Limiting and controlling output and sales — Decision adopted following the annulment of previous decisions — Holding of a new hearing in the presence of the competition authorities of the Member States — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration — Reasonable time — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 9 novembre 2022
21125Case T-246/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 November 2022 — Cambodia and CRF v Commission (Safeguard measures — Rice market — Imports of Indica rice originating in Cambodia and Myanmar/Burma — Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 — Concept of ‘Union producers’ — Concept of ‘like or directly competing products’ — Serious difficulties — Rights of the defence — Essential facts and considerations — Manifest errors of assessment)cjeu_case · 9 novembre 2022
21126Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 November 2022.#Growth Finance Plus AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark catlover – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-232/22.cjeu_case · 8 novembre 2022
21127Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 November 2022.#Growth Finance Plus AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark catlover – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-232/22.cjeu_case · 8 novembre 2022
21128Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 November 2022.#Growth Finance Plus AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark doglover – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-231/22.cjeu_case · 8 novembre 2022
21129Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 November 2022.#Growth Finance Plus AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark doglover – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-231/22.cjeu_case · 8 novembre 2022
21130Case T-719/22: Action brought on 8 November 2022 — Puma v EUIPO — Herno (HERZO)cjeu_case · 8 novembre 2022
21131Case T-678/22: Action brought on 8 November 2022 — van der Linde v EDPScjeu_case · 8 novembre 2022
21132Case T-232/22: Order of the General Court of 8 November 2022 — Growth Finance Plus v EUIPO (catlover) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark catlover — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 8 novembre 2022
21133Case T-231/22: Order of the General Court of 8 November 2022 — Growth Finance Plus v EUIPO (doglover) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark doglover — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 8 novembre 2022
21134Case T-160/22: Order of the General Court of 8 November 2022 — 1906 Collins v EUIPO — Peace United (bâoli BEACH)cjeu_case · 8 novembre 2022
21135Case T-87/22: Order of the General Court of 8 November 2022 — Hahn Rechtsanwälte v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 novembre 2022
21136Order of the Court of 8 November 2022.#Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-405/22 P.cjeu_case · 8 novembre 2022
21137Order of the Court of 8 November 2022.#Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-405/22 P.cjeu_case · 8 novembre 2022
21138Case C-696/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj (Romania) lodged on 8 November 2022 — C SPRL v AJFP Cluj and DGRFP Cluj-Napocacjeu_case · 8 novembre 2022
21139Case C-688/22 P: Appeal brought on 8 November 2022 by Methanol Holdings (Trinidad) Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 14 September 2022 in Case T-744/19, Methanol Holdings (Trinidad) v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 novembre 2022
21140Case C-686/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 8 November 2022 — M.S. and S.S. v Stadt Krefeldcjeu_case · 8 novembre 2022