Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
20841

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 November 2022.#Allessa GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – EU word mark CASSELLAPARK – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Lack of descriptive character – Mark not of such a nature as to mislead the public – Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-701/21.

cjeu_case ·
20842

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 November 2022.#Allessa GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – EU word mark CASSELLAPARK – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Lack of descriptive character – Mark not of such a nature as to mislead the public – Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-701/21.

cjeu_case ·
20843

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 November 2022.#Zeta Farmaceutici SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark EUPHYTOS – Earlier EU figurative mark EuPhidra – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 56(2) and Article 43(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 64(2) and Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Relevant periods – Submission of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Classification of new or complementary evidence – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-515/21.

cjeu_case ·
20844

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 November 2022.#Zeta Farmaceutici SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark EUPHYTOS – Earlier EU figurative mark EuPhidra – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 56(2) and Article 43(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 64(2) and Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Relevant periods – Submission of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Classification of new or complementary evidence – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-515/21.

cjeu_case ·
20845

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 November 2022.#Ian James Bowden and Janey Young v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Europol staff – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Loss of nationality of a Member State – Termination of contract – Article 47(b)(iii) of the CEOS – Request for an exception from the condition of employment provided for in Article 12(2)(a) of the CEOS – Refusal to grant an exception – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Length of the administrative procedure – Reasonable time – Legitimate expectations – Equal treatment – Interest of the service – Duty of care – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-72/21.

cjeu_case ·
20846

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 November 2022.#Ian James Bowden and Janey Young v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Europol staff – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Loss of nationality of a Member State – Termination of contract – Article 47(b)(iii) of the CEOS – Request for an exception from the condition of employment provided for in Article 12(2)(a) of the CEOS – Refusal to grant an exception – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Length of the administrative procedure – Reasonable time – Legitimate expectations – Equal treatment – Interest of the service – Duty of care – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-72/21.

cjeu_case ·
20847

Case T-701/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2022 — Allessa v EUIPO — Dumerth (CASSELLAPARK) (EU trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — EU word mark CASSELLAPARK — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Lack of descriptive character — Mark not of such a nature as to mislead the public — Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
20848

Case T-515/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2022 — Zeta Farmaceutici v EUIPO — Specchiasol (EUPHYTOS) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU wordmark EUPHYTOS — Earlier EU figurative mark EuPhidra — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 56(2) and Article 43(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 64(2) and Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Relevant periods — Submission of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)

cjeu_case ·
20849

Case T-72/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2022 — Bowden and Young v Europol (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Europol staff — Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union — Loss of nationality of a Member State — Termination of contract — Article 47(b)(iii) of the CEOS — Request for an exception from the condition of employment provided for in Article 12(2)(a) of the CEOS — Refusal to grant an exception — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Length of the administrative procedure — Reasonable time — Legitimate expectations — Equal treatment — Interest of the service — Duty of care — Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
20850

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 November 2022.#CWS Powder Coatings GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/217 – Classification of titanium dioxide in powder form containing 1% or more of particles of a diameter equal to or below 10 μm – Criteria for classification of a substance as carcinogenic – Reliability and acceptability of studies – Substance that has the intrinsic property to cause cancer – Calculation of lung overload in particles – Manifest errors of assessment.#Cases T-279/20 and T-288/20.

cjeu_case ·
20851

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 November 2022.#CWS Powder Coatings GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/217 – Classification of titanium dioxide in powder form containing 1% or more of particles of a diameter equal to or below 10 μm – Criteria for classification of a substance as carcinogenic – Reliability and acceptability of studies – Substance that has the intrinsic property to cause cancer – Calculation of lung overload in particles – Manifest errors of assessment.#Cases T-279/20 and T-288/20.

cjeu_case ·
20852

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 November 2022.#Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for prestressing steel – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Suspension of the obligation to provide a bank guarantee – Payment by instalments on a provisional basis – Judgment annulling in part the decision and setting a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine originally imposed – Application of payments made on a provisional basis – Default interest – First paragraph of Article 266 TFEU – Unjust enrichment – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Recovery of undue payments – No legal basis – Unlawfulness.#Case T-275/20.

cjeu_case ·
20853

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 November 2022.#Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for prestressing steel – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Suspension of the obligation to provide a bank guarantee – Payment by instalments on a provisional basis – Judgment annulling in part the decision and setting a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine originally imposed – Application of payments made on a provisional basis – Default interest – First paragraph of Article 266 TFEU – Unjust enrichment – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Recovery of undue payments – No legal basis – Unlawfulness.#Case T-275/20.

cjeu_case ·
20854

Joined Cases T-279/20 and T-288/20 and Case T-283/20: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2022 — CWS Powder Coatings and Others v Commission (Environment and protection of human health — Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 — Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/217 — Classification of titanium dioxide in powder form containing 1 % or more of particles of a diameter equal to or below 10 μm — Criteria for classification of a substance as carcinogenic — Reliability and acceptability of studies — Substance that has the intrinsic property to cause cancer — Calculation of lung overload in particles — Manifest errors of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
20855

Case T-275/20: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2022 — Westfälische Drahtindustrie and Others v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for prestressing steel — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Suspension of the obligation to provide a bank guarantee — Payment by instalments on a provisional basis — Judgment annulling in part the decision and setting a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine originally imposed — Application of payments made on a provisional basis — Default interest — First paragraph of Article 266 TFEU — Unjust enrichment — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Recovery of undue payments — No legal basis — Unlawfulness)

cjeu_case ·