20321Case C-770/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova (Italy) lodged on 19 December 2022 — OSTP Italy Srl v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ufficio delle Dogane di Genova 1, Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ufficio delle dogane di Genova 2 and Agenzia delle Entrate — Riscossione — Genovacjeu_case · 19 décembre 2022
20322Case C-769/22: Action brought on 19 December 2022 — European Commission v Hungarycjeu_case · 19 décembre 2022
20323Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2022.#XH v European Commission.#Staff case – Officials – Promotion – 2020 promotion exercise – Decision refusing to amend the applicant’s Sysper 2 file – Decision not to promote the applicant – Time limits for lodging an appeal – Public policy nature – Starting point – Application for legal aid – Suspension of time limits – Computation of time limits – Lateness – Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure – Excusable error – Inadmissibility.#Case T-522/21.cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2022
20324Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2022.#XH v European Commission.#Staff case – Officials – Promotion – 2020 promotion exercise – Decision refusing to amend the applicant’s Sysper 2 file – Decision not to promote the applicant – Time limits for lodging an appeal – Public policy nature – Starting point – Application for legal aid – Suspension of time limits – Computation of time limits – Lateness – Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure – Excusable error – Inadmissibility.#Case T-522/21.cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2022
20325Case T-522/21: Order of the General Court of 19 December 2022 — XH v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Promotion — 2020 promotion exercise — Decision refusing to amend the applicant’s Sysper 2 file — Decision not to promote the applicant — Time limits for lodging an appeal — Public policy nature — Starting point — Application for legal aid — Suspension of time limits — Computation of time limits — Lateness — Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure — Excusable error — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2022
20326Case T-786/22: Action brought on 18 December 2022 — Frajese v Commissioncjeu_case · 18 décembre 2022
20329Case T-785/22: Action brought on 16 December 2022 — France v Commissioncjeu_case · 16 décembre 2022
20330Order of the Court of 16 December 2022.#Group Nivelles v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-419/22 P.cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2022
20331Order of the Court of 16 December 2022.#Group Nivelles v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-419/22 P.cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2022
20332Case C-768/22: Action brought on 16 December 2022 — European Commission v Portuguese Republiccjeu_case · 16 décembre 2022
20333Case C-766/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht München (Germany) lodged on 16 December 2022 — WD v Allane SEcjeu_case · 16 décembre 2022
20334Case C-765/22, Air Berlín: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Palma de Mallorca (Spain) lodged on 16 December 2022 — Luis Carlos and Others v Air Berlín PLC & CO Luftverkehrs KG, Sucursal en Españacjeu_case · 16 décembre 2022
20335Case C-763/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille (France) lodged on 16 December 2022 — Procureur de la République v OPcjeu_case · 16 décembre 2022
20336Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2022.#EMS Electro Medical Systems GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark AIRFLOW – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-751/21.cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2022
20337Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2022.#EMS Electro Medical Systems GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark AIRFLOW – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-751/21.cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2022
20338Case T-751/21: Order of the General Court of 16 December 2022 — EMS v EUIPO (AIRFLOW) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark AIRFLOW — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 16 décembre 2022
20339Case T-443/22: Order of the General Court of 15 December 2022 — PV v European Public Prosecutor’s Officecjeu_case · 15 décembre 2022
20340Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 December 2022.#Società Eredi Raimondo Bufarini Srl – Servizi Ambientali v Ministero dell'Interno and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 53 and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Exceptions to that obligation – Criteria – Situations in which the correct interpretation of EU law is so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt – Condition related to the national court or tribunal of last instance being convinced that the matter would be equally obvious to the other courts or tribunals of last instance of the Member States and to the Court of Justice.#Case C-144/22.cjeu_case · 15 décembre 2022