Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
2001

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Opera Laboratori Fiorentini SpA v Ministero della Cultura and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 5k(1)(c) – Prohibition on awarding and continuing the performance of any public contract or concession to or with a natural or legal person, entity or body acting ‘on behalf or at the direction’ of an ‘entity referred to in point (a) or (b) of this paragraph’ – Award of a public contract by the authorities of a Member State to a resident company two of whose three members of its administrative board are Russian nationals and one of those Russian nationals, who is the chair and the chief executive officer of that administrative board, is also sole administrator of the parent company of the company concerned.#Case C-313/24.

cjeu_case ·
2002

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Opera Laboratori Fiorentini SpA v Ministero della Cultura and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 5k(1)(c) – Prohibition on awarding and continuing the performance of any public contract or concession to or with a natural or legal person, entity or body acting ‘on behalf or at the direction’ of an ‘entity referred to in point (a) or (b) of this paragraph’ – Award of a public contract by the authorities of a Member State to a resident company two of whose three members of its administrative board are Russian nationals and one of those Russian nationals, who is the chair and the chief executive officer of that administrative board, is also sole administrator of the parent company of the company concerned.#Case C-313/24.

cjeu_case ·
2003

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#VšĮ „Vilniaus tarptautinė mokykla“ v Valstybinė kalbos inspekcija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Scope – Economic activity – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Article 53 – Knowledge of languages – National legislation laying down a requirement that teachers and the members of administrative staff in regular communication with the public and with the administrative authorities employed in a private educational institution are proficient in the official language – Article 4(2) TEU – National identity of a Member State – Protection and promotion of the official language of a Member State – Private educational institution delivering international education programmes – Necessity condition – Principle of proportionality – Requirement of proficiency in the official language with no possibility for exception or flexibility.#Case C-48/24.

cjeu_case ·
2004

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#VšĮ „Vilniaus tarptautinė mokykla“ v Valstybinė kalbos inspekcija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Scope – Economic activity – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Article 53 – Knowledge of languages – National legislation laying down a requirement that teachers and the members of administrative staff in regular communication with the public and with the administrative authorities employed in a private educational institution are proficient in the official language – Article 4(2) TEU – National identity of a Member State – Protection and promotion of the official language of a Member State – Private educational institution delivering international education programmes – Necessity condition – Principle of proportionality – Requirement of proficiency in the official language with no possibility for exception or flexibility.#Case C-48/24.

cjeu_case ·
2011

Case C-861/24, Societatea Naţională [U]: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa (Romania)) – MB v Societatea Naţională [U] (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Directive (EU) 2019/1158 – Protection against dismissal – National provisions more favourable to the protection of the safety and health of workers – Parental leave – National rule laying down a general and absolute prohibition on the dismissal of a worker in receipt of a reintegration incentive – Article 16 and Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – No implementation of EU law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

cjeu_case ·
2012

Case C-864/24, Valora Effekten Handel: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – GT, Beteiligungen im Baltikum AG, VCI Venture Capital und Immobilien AG v Valora Effekten Handel AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2004/109/EC – Harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market established or operating in a Member State – Notification of the acquisition of major holdings in companies – Acquisition of such holdings by persons acting in concert – Article 3(1a), fourth subparagraph – Concept of more stringent requirements – Laws, regulations or administrative provisions adopted in relation to takeover bids, merger transactions and other transactions affecting the ownership or control of companies)

cjeu_case ·
2013

Case C-680/24, WizzAir Hungary: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie – Poland) – WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Kft. v Prezes Urzędu Lotnictwa Cywilnego (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Airport charges – Directive 2009/12/EC – Point 3 of Article 2 – Concept of airport user – Article 6(2) – Obligation on the airport managing body to consult with airport users regarding changes to the system or the level of airport charges – Point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Mandatory procedure for determining or approving airport charges or their maximum level by the independent supervisory authority – Second subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Article 11(1) and (7) – Obligation on that authority to consult with airport users regarding modifications of the system or the level of airport charges in the context of a mandatory procedure under national law – Scope – Principle of non-discrimination and principle of transparency)

cjeu_case ·
2014

Case C-634/24, Lenaimon: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas – Lithuania) – M.P. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border checks, asylum and immigration – Crossing of external borders of the Member States – Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 – National legislation requiring a national of several third countries who has benefitted from a visa-free regime to present an additional document in order to obtain a temporary residence permit – Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union, of the other part – Direct effect)

cjeu_case ·
2015

Case C-490/24, Stichting Koskea: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden – Netherlands) – Stichting Koskea, as administrator of ED v Nationale Nederlanden Schadeverzekering Maatschappij NV, trading under the name of Reaal Schadeverzekering NV (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles – Directive 2009/103/EC – Article 12(1) – Obligation for personal injuries to all passengers, other than the driver, arising out of the use of a vehicle to be covered by civil liability insurance – Scope – Road traffic accident involving a single vehicle – Damage suffered by the driver of the vehicle as a result of the intervention of a passenger in the driving of the vehicle)

cjeu_case ·
2016

Case C-471/24, PKO BP (Critical benchmark): Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Częstochowie – Poland) – J.J. v PKO BP S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Credit agreement – Variable-rate mortgage loan agreement – Contractual term providing for the determination of the interest rate on the basis of a benchmark within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 – Article 1(2) of Directive 93/13 – Contractual term reflecting mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions – Article 4(2) of Directive 93/13 – Concept of definition of the main subject matter of the contract – Requirement of transparency – Article 3(1) of Directive 93/13 – Unfairness)

cjeu_case ·
2017

Case C-408/24,Austrian Airlines: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof – Austria) – Republik Österreich v Austrian Airlines AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 – Single European sky – Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 – Provision of air navigation services in the single European sky – Article 8 – Air traffic service providers – Articles 14 and 15 – Charges payable by airspace users – Failure of an aeronautical telecommunications server – Cancellation of flights – Alleged culpable negligence on the part of the provider concerned – Airspace users – Protection of those users against the material damage caused by such negligence)

cjeu_case ·
2018

Case C-313/24, Opera Laboratori Fiorentini: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Opera Laboratori Fiorentini SpA v Ministero della Cultura, Gallerie degli Uffizi, A.L.E.S. – Arte Lavoro e Servizi SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 5k(1)(c) – Prohibition on awarding and continuing the performance of any public contract or concession to or with a natural or legal person, entity or body acting on behalf or at the direction of an entity referred to in point (a) or (b) of this paragraph – Award of a public contract by the authorities of a Member State to a resident company two of whose three members of its administrative board are Russian nationals and one of those Russian nationals, who is the chair and the chief executive officer of that administrative board, is also sole administrator of the parent company of the company concerned)

cjeu_case ·
2019

Case C-48/24, Vilniaus tarptautinė mokykla: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas – Lithuania) – VšĮ Vilniaus tarptautinė mokykla v Valstybinė kalbos inspekcija (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Scope – Economic activity – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Article 53 – Knowledge of languages – National legislation laying down a requirement that teachers and the members of administrative staff in regular communication with the public and with the administrative authorities employed in a private educational institution are proficient in the official language – Article 4(2) TEU – National identity of a Member State – Protection and promotion of the official language of a Member State – Private educational institution delivering international education programmes – Necessity condition – Principle of proportionality – Requirement of proficiency in the official language with no possibility for exception or flexibility)

cjeu_case ·