20001Case C-17/23 P: Appeal brought on 14 January 2023 by Asociación Liberum and 926 other appellants against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 15 November 2022 in Case T-476/22 Asociación Liberum and Others v European Parliament and Councilcjeu_case · 14 janvier 2023
20003Case C-12/23 P: Appeal brought on 13 January 2023 by Autoramiksas UAB against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 10 November 2022 in Case T-374/22, Autoramiksas v Commissioncjeu_case · 13 janvier 2023
20004Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2023.#XO v Finanzamt Österreich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Social security – Family benefits – Indexation based on price – Answer to a question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – No connection between the question referred for a preliminary ruling and the dispute in the main proceedings – Question manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-574/20.cjeu_case · 13 janvier 2023
20005Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2023.#XO v Finanzamt Österreich.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Social security – Family benefits – Indexation based on price – Answer to a question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – No connection between the question referred for a preliminary ruling and the dispute in the main proceedings – Question manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-574/20.cjeu_case · 13 janvier 2023
20006Case C-574/20, Finanzamt Österreich: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht -Austria) — XO v Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Waldviertel (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Social security — Family benefits — Indexation based on price — Answer to a question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law — No connection between the question referred for a preliminary ruling and the dispute in the main proceedings — Question manifestly inadmissible)cjeu_case · 13 janvier 2023
20008Case C-11/23, Eventmedia Soluciones: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Palma de Mallorca (Spain) lodged on 12 January 2023 — Eventmedia Soluciones, S.L. v Air Europa Líneas Aéreas, S.A.U.cjeu_case · 12 janvier 2023
20009Case C-8/23, Conseil national de l’ordre des médecins: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 12 January 2023 — FH v Conseil national de l’ordre des médecinscjeu_case · 12 janvier 2023
20010Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#Criminal proceedings against SNI.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Requirement to state the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-506/22.cjeu_case · 12 janvier 2023
20011Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#Criminal proceedings against SNI.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Câmpina.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Requirement to state the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-506/22.cjeu_case · 12 janvier 2023
20012Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#Criminal proceedings against MW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA – Article 3(1) – Principle of assimilation of earlier convictions handed down in another Member State – Obligation to ensure that the effects attached to those convictions are equivalent to those attached to previous national convictions – National rules concerning subsequent formation of a cumulative sentence – Multiple offences – Determination of an aggregate sentence – Maximum of 15 years for non-life custodial sentences – Article 3(5) – Exception – Offence committed before the handing down or execution of sentences in another Member State.#Case C-583/22 PPU.cjeu_case · 12 janvier 2023
20013Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#Criminal proceedings against MW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA – Article 3(1) – Principle of assimilation of earlier convictions handed down in another Member State – Obligation to ensure that the effects attached to those convictions are equivalent to those attached to previous national convictions – National rules concerning subsequent formation of a cumulative sentence – Multiple offences – Determination of an aggregate sentence – Maximum of 15 years for non-life custodial sentences – Article 3(5) – Exception – Offence committed before the handing down or execution of sentences in another Member State.#Case C-583/22 PPU.cjeu_case · 12 janvier 2023
20014Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 12 January 2023.#T.C. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in the matters of parental responsibility – International child abduction – 1980 Hague Convention – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Article 11 – Application for return of a child – Final decision ordering the return of a child – Legislation of a Member State providing for automatic suspension of the enforcement of that decision in the event that a request is made by certain national authorities.#Case C-638/22 PPU.cjeu_case · 12 janvier 2023
20015Case C-698/22, TP and OF: Order of the President of the Court of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad — Varna — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against TP, OFcjeu_case · 12 janvier 2023
20016Case C-506/22, SNI: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Câmpina — Romania) — criminal proceedings against SNI (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court — Requirement to state the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation — Lack of sufficient details — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 12 janvier 2023
20017Case C-583/22 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — criminal proceedings against MV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA — Article 3(1) — Principle of assimilation of earlier convictions handed down in another Member State — Obligation to ensure that the effects attached to those convictions are equivalent to those attached to previous national convictions — National rules concerning subsequent formation of a cumulative sentence — Multiple offences — Determination of an aggregate sentence — Maximum of 15 years for non-life custodial sentences — Article 3(5) — Exception — Offence committed before the handing down or execution of sentences in another Member State)cjeu_case · 12 janvier 2023
20018Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#Frédéric Jouvin v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Article 101 TFEU – Complaint submitted to the European Commission – Commission Decision rejecting the complaint – Action for annulment – Time limit for lodging a response.#Case C-719/21 P.cjeu_case · 12 janvier 2023
20019Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#Frédéric Jouvin v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Article 101 TFEU – Complaint submitted to the European Commission – Commission Decision rejecting the complaint – Action for annulment – Time limit for lodging a response.#Case C-719/21 P.cjeu_case · 12 janvier 2023
20020Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#KT and NS v FTI Touristik GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Article 14(1) – Package travel and linked travel arrangements – Performance of a package travel contract – Liability of the organiser concerned – Measures to fight the worldwide spread of an infectious disease – COVID-19 pandemic – Restrictions imposed at the travel destination and in the place of residence of the traveller concerned and in other countries – Lack of conformity of the services provided as part of the package concerned – Appropriate reduction in the price of that package.#Case C-396/21.cjeu_case · 12 janvier 2023