Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
1984

Case C-712/25 PPU, Rastoshev: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad – Sofia – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against XM (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of conducting a criminal prosecution – Execution of the European arrest warrant – Article 4(7)(a) – Grounds for optional non-execution – Offences which have been committed in whole or in part in the territory of the executing Member State – Risk of impunity)

cjeu_case ·
1985

Case C-56/25, Petlichev: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad – Bulgaria) – criminal proceedings against MA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Principle of the primacy of EU law – National law alleged to be incompatible with the national Constitution and with EU law – Conditions for referring a matter to a constitutional court – Reasoned assessment of the consequences of the application of EU law – Prior reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling – Article 94(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Determination of the national law applicable to the dispute – Content of the request for a preliminary ruling – Obligation or entitlement to refer a matter to a constitutional court before making a reference to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling – None)

cjeu_case ·
1988

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#MB v Societatea Națională [U].#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Directive (EU) 2019/1158 – Protection against dismissal – National provisions more favourable to the protection of the safety and health of workers – Parental leave – National rule laying down a general and absolute prohibition on the dismissal of a worker in receipt of a reintegration incentive – Article 16 and Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – No implementation of EU law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-861/24.

cjeu_case ·
1990

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#GT and Others v Valora Effekten Handel AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2004/109/EC – Harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market established or operating in a Member State – Notification of the acquisition of major holdings in companies – Acquisition of such holdings by persons acting in concert – Article 3(1a), fourth subparagraph – Concept of ‘more stringent’ requirements – Laws, regulations or administrative provisions adopted in relation to takeover bids, merger transactions and other transactions affecting the ownership or control of companies.#Case C-864/24.

cjeu_case ·
1991

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Kft. v Prezes Urzędu Lotnictwa Cywilnego.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Airport charges – Directive 2009/12/EC – Point 3 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘airport user’ – Article 6(2) – Obligation on the airport managing body to consult with airport users regarding changes to the system or the level of airport charges – Point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Mandatory procedure for determining or approving airport charges or their maximum level by the independent supervisory authority – Second subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Article 11(1) and (7) – Obligation on that authority to consult with airport users regarding modifications of the system or the level of airport charges in the context of a mandatory procedure under national law – Scope – Principles of non-discrimination and transparency.#Case C-680/24.

cjeu_case ·
1992

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Kft. v Prezes Urzędu Lotnictwa Cywilnego.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Airport charges – Directive 2009/12/EC – Point 3 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘airport user’ – Article 6(2) – Obligation on the airport managing body to consult with airport users regarding changes to the system or the level of airport charges – Point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Mandatory procedure for determining or approving airport charges or their maximum level by the independent supervisory authority – Second subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Article 11(1) and (7) – Obligation on that authority to consult with airport users regarding modifications of the system or the level of airport charges in the context of a mandatory procedure under national law – Scope – Principle of non-discrimination and principle of transparency.#Case C-680/24.

cjeu_case ·
1993

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#M.P. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border checks, asylum and immigration – Crossing of external borders of the Member States – Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 – National legislation requiring a national of several third countries who has benefitted from a visa-free regime to present an additional document in order to obtain a temporary residence permit – Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union, of the other part – Direct effect.#Case C-634/24.

cjeu_case ·
1994

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#M.P. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border checks, asylum and immigration – Crossing of external borders of the Member States – Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 – National legislation requiring a national of several third countries who has benefitted from a visa-free regime to present an additional document in order to obtain a temporary residence permit – Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union, of the other part – Direct effect.#Case C-634/24.

cjeu_case ·
1995

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Stichting Koskea, agissant en qualité d’administrateur de ED v Nationale Nederlanden Schadeverzekering Maatschappij NV exerçant sous la dénomination commerciale de Reaal Schadeverzekering NV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles – Directive 2009/103/EC – Article 12(1) – Obligation for personal injuries to all passengers, other than the driver, arising out of the use of a vehicle to be covered by civil liability insurance – Scope – Road traffic accident involving a single vehicle – Damage suffered by the driver of the vehicle as a result of the intervention of a passenger in the driving of the vehicle.#Case C-490/24.

cjeu_case ·
1996

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Stichting Koskea, agissant en qualité d’administrateur de ED v Nationale Nederlanden Schadeverzekering Maatschappij NV exerçant sous la dénomination commerciale de Reaal Schadeverzekering NV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles – Directive 2009/103/EC – Article 12(1) – Obligation for personal injuries to all passengers, other than the driver, arising out of the use of a vehicle to be covered by civil liability insurance – Scope – Road traffic accident involving a single vehicle – Damage suffered by the driver of the vehicle as a result of the intervention of a passenger in the driving of the vehicle.#Case C-490/24.

cjeu_case ·
1998

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#J.J. v PKO BP S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Credit agreement – Variable-rate mortgage loan agreement – Contractual term providing for the determination of the interest rate on the basis of a benchmark within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 – Article 1(2) of Directive 93/13 – Contractual term reflecting mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions – Article 4(2) of Directive 93/13 – Concept of ‘definition of the main subject matter of the contract’ – Requirement of transparency – Article 3(1) of Directive 93/13 – Unfairness.#Case C-471/24.

cjeu_case ·
1999

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 12 février 2026.#Republik Österreich contre Austrian Airlines AG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transports aériens – Règlement (CE) no 549/2004 – Ciel unique européen – Règlement (CE) no 550/2004 – Fourniture de services de navigation aérienne dans le ciel unique européen – Article 8 – Prestataires de services de la circulation aérienne – Articles 14 et 15 – Redevances à la charge des usagers de l’espace aérien – Défaillance d’un serveur de télécommunications aéronautiques – Annulation de vols – Manquement fautif allégué de la part du prestataire concerné – Usagers de l’espace aérien – Protection de ces usagers contre les préjudices économiques causés par un tel manquement.#Affaire C-408/24.

cjeu_case ·
2000

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Republik Österreich v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 – Single European sky – Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 – Provision of air navigation services in the single European sky – Article 8 – Air traffic service providers – Articles 14 and 15 – Charges payable by airspace users – Failure of an aeronautical telecommunications server – Cancellation of flights – Alleged culpable negligence on the part of the provider concerned – Airspace users – Protection of those users against the material damage caused by such negligence.#Case C-408/24.

cjeu_case ·