Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161316) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43188) directive (8067)
316 885 documents
19081

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Prokurator Generalny v D.J. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-43/22.

cjeu_case ·
19082

Case C-43/22, Prokurator Generalny (Polish extraordinary appeal II): Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – Prokurator Generalny (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of court or tribunal – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
19083

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024 (Extracts).#Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions – Plea of illegality – Legal basis of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s margin of discretion – SRB’s margin of discretion – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-360/21.

cjeu_case ·
19084

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024 (Extracts).#Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions – Plea of illegality – Legal basis of Regulation No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s margin of discretion – SRB’s margin of discretion – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-360/21.

cjeu_case ·
19085

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024 (Extracts).#Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions – Plea of illegality – Legal basis of Regulation No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s margin of discretion – SRB’s margin of discretion – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-360/21.

cjeu_case ·
19086

Case T-360/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Portigon v SRB (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions – Plea of illegality – Legal basis of Regulation No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s discretion – SRB’s discretion – Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
19087

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-720/21.

cjeu_case ·
19088

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-720/21.

cjeu_case ·
19089

Case C-720/21, Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (Polish extraordinary appeal): Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of court or tribunal – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
19090

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024.#Decal España, SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors – Tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) – Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part – Disappearance in part of the subject matter of the dispute – No need to adjudicate in part – New aid – Recovery – Contractual clauses protecting the beneficiaries against the recovery of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market – Division of powers between the Commission and the national authorities.#Case T-509/14.

cjeu_case ·
19091

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024.#Decal España, SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors – Tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) – Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part – Disappearance in part of the subject matter of the dispute – No need to adjudicate in part – New aid – Recovery – Contractual clauses protecting the beneficiaries against the recovery of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market – Division of powers between the Commission and the national authorities.#Case T-509/14.

cjeu_case ·
19092

Case T-509/14: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Decal España v Commission (State aid - Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors - Tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) - Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part - Disappearance in part of the subject matter of the dispute - No need to adjudicate in part - New aid - Recovery - Contractual clauses protecting the beneficiaries against the recovery of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market - Division of powers between the Commission and the national authorities)

cjeu_case ·