Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161316) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43188) directive (8067)
316 885 documents
18361

Case T-1/14: Judgment of the General Court of 26 June 2024 – Aluminios Cortizo and Cortizo Cartera v Commission (State aid – Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors – Tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) – Decision declaring the aid incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part – Partial disappearance of the subject matter of the dispute – No need to adjudicate in part – New aid – Recovery – Contractual clauses protecting the beneficiaries against the recovery of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market – Division of powers between the Commission and the national authorities)

cjeu_case ·
18375

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 June 2024.#Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi - Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Bacău - Activitatea de Inspecţie Fiscală v S.C. Dragoram Tour S.R.L.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 306 to 308 – Special scheme for travel agents – Scope – Transactions carried out by travel agents consisting of the resale, at a price including a mark-up, of airline tickets purchased from taxable third parties – Absence of additional service.#Case C-763/23.

cjeu_case ·
18376

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 June 2024.#Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi - Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Bacău - Activitatea de Inspecţie Fiscală v S.C. Dragoram Tour S.R.L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 306 to 308 – Special scheme for travel agents – Scope – Transactions carried out by travel agents consisting of the resale, at a price including a mark-up, of airline tickets purchased from taxable third parties – Absence of additional service.#Case C-763/23.

cjeu_case ·
18377

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2024.#Caisse autonome de retraite des chirurgiens dentistes et des sages-femmes (CARCDSF) v E... D...#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Freedom to provide services – Obligation of affiliation and to pay contributions to a pension scheme – Purely internal situation – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Requirement to provide the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-401/23.

cjeu_case ·
18378

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2024.#Caisse autonome de retraite des chirurgiens dentistes et des sages-femmes (CARCDSF) v E... D...#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire de Metz.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Freedom to provide services – Obligation of affiliation and to pay contributions to a pension scheme – Purely internal situation – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Requirement to provide the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-401/23.

cjeu_case ·
18379

Case C-763/23, Dragoram Tour: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău – Romania) – Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi, Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi – Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Bacău – Activitatea de Inspecţie Fiscală v S.C. Dragoram Tour S.R.L. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 306 to 308 – Special scheme for travel agents – Scope – Transactions carried out by travel agents consisting of the resale, at a price including a mark-up, of airline tickets purchased from taxable third parties – Absence of additional service)

cjeu_case ·
18380

Case C-401/23, CARCDSF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire de Metz – France) – Caisse autonome de retraite des chirurgiens dentistes et des sages-femmes (CARCDSF) v E … D … (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Freedom to provide services – Obligation of affiliation and to pay contributions to a pension scheme – Purely internal situation – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Requirement to provide the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·