Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161316) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43188) directive (8067)
316 885 documents
16701

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 September 2024.#Maya Tokareva v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Definition of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Definition of ‘benefiting from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Error of assessment – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-744/22.

cjeu_case ·
16702

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Pavel Ezubov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Letter informing the applicant of the maintenance of his name on the list – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1) in fine of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘person benefiting from a leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-741/22.

cjeu_case ·
16703

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Pavel Ezubov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Letter informing the applicant of the maintenance of his name on the list – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1) in fine of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘person benefiting from a leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-741/22.

cjeu_case ·
16704

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko and Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicants’ names on the list – Obligation to report funds or economic resources belonging to or owned, held or controlled by the applicants – Obligation to cooperate with the competent national authority – Participation in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent restrictive measures – Article 9(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Direct concern – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Misuse of powers – Power of the Council – Proportionality – Legal certainty.#Case T-644/22.

cjeu_case ·
16705

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko and Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicants’ names on the list – Obligation to report funds or economic resources belonging to or owned, held or controlled by the applicants – Obligation to cooperate with the competent national authority – Participation in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent restrictive measures – Article 9(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Direct concern – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Misuse of powers – Power of the Council – Proportionality – Legal certainty.#Case T-644/22.

cjeu_case ·
16706

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Mikhail Fridman and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicants’ names on the list – Obligation to report funds or economic resources belonging to or owned, held or controlled by the applicants – Obligation to cooperate with the competent national authority – Participation in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent restrictive measures – Article 9(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Direct concern – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Power of the Council – Proportionality.#Case T-635/22.

cjeu_case ·
16707

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Mikhail Fridman and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicants’ names on the list – Obligation to report funds or economic resources belonging to or owned, held or controlled by the applicants – Obligation to cooperate with the competent national authority – Participation in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent restrictive measures – Article 9(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Direct concern – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Power of the Council – Proportionality.#Case T-635/22.

cjeu_case ·
16708

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Fachverband Eisenhüttenschlacken eV v European Commission.#EU fertilising products – Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/973 – Limit values for chromium and vanadium in EU fertilising products using ferrous slags as by-products – Criteria on agronomic efficiency and safety for the use of by-products in fertilising products – Precautionary principle – Legal certainty – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-560/22.

cjeu_case ·
16709

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Fachverband Eisenhüttenschlacken eV v European Commission.#EU fertilising products – Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/973 – Limit values for chromium and vanadium in EU fertilising products using ferrous slags as by-products – Criteria on agronomic efficiency and safety for the use of by-products in fertilising products – Precautionary principle – Legal certainty – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-560/22.

cjeu_case ·
16710

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Marina Alexandrova Mordashova v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Applicant’s name included and maintained on the list – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘benefit obtained from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Legal certainty – Principle of non-discrimination – Right to be heard.#Case T-497/22.

cjeu_case ·
16711

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Marina Alexandrova Mordashova v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Applicant’s name included and maintained on the list – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘benefit obtained from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Legal certainty – Principle of non-discrimination – Right to be heard.#Case T-497/22.

cjeu_case ·
16712

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 September 2024.#NKO AO National Settlement Depository (NSD) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Definition of ‘supporting, materially or financially, the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Proportionality.#Case T-494/22.

cjeu_case ·
16713

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 September 2024.#NKO AO National Settlement Depository (NSD) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Definition of ‘supporting, materially or financially, the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Proportionality.#Case T-494/22.

cjeu_case ·
16714

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Musa Yusopovich Bazhaev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons’ – Article 2(1)(d) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘association’ – Error of assessment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to private life – Proportionality – Principle of non-discrimination.#Case T-362/22.

cjeu_case ·
16715

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Musa Yusopovich Bazhaev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons’ – Article 2(1)(d) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘association’ – Error of assessment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to private life – Proportionality – Principle of non-discrimination.#Case T-362/22.

cjeu_case ·
16718

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Vyatsky Plywood Mill OOO v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of birch plywood originating in Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1930 – Objective examination – Post-investigation period – Market segmentation – Other injury factors – Article 3(2), (6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Equal treatment – Union interest – Article 21 of Regulation 2016/1036 – Rights of the defence.#Case T-32/22.

cjeu_case ·
16719

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Vyatsky Plywood Mill OOO v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of birch plywood originating in Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1930 – Objective examination – Post-investigation period – Market segmentation – Other injury factors – Article 3(2), (6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Equal treatment – Union interest – Article 21 of Regulation 2016/1036 – Rights of the defence.#Case T-32/22.

cjeu_case ·