Documents : Union européenne

316838 documents
1604

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#Mikail Safarbekovich Gutseriev v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in response to the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in Russia’s aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the lists – Error of assessment.#Case T-286/25.

cjeu_case ·
1606

Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 13 mai 2026.#Kutxabank, SA contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative K. – Marques de l’Union européenne figuratives antérieures k et k kutxabank kredit – Motif relatif de refus – Absence de risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 207/2009 – Absence de similitude des services – Absence de similitude des signes – Recours incident.#Affaire T-105/25.

cjeu_case ·
1607

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#Kutxabank, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark K. – Earlier EU figurative marks k and k kutxabank kredit – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Lack of similarity of the services – Lack of similarity of the signs – Cross-claim.#Case T-105/25.

cjeu_case ·
1608

Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 13 mai 2026.#Les Éditions Albert René contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale Obelix – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale antérieure OBELIX – Cause de nullité relative – Renommée de la marque antérieure – Lien entre les marques en conflit – Article 8, paragraphe 5, et article 60, paragraphe 1, sous a), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-24/25.

cjeu_case ·
1611

Case T-390/25: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2026 – Ixo Restauración v EUIPO – Promollum 142 B (MUKA) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark MUKA – Earlier national word mark LAMUCCA – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 64(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
1612

Case T-286/25: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2026 – Gutseriev v Council (Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in response to the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in Russia’s aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the lists – Error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
1613

Case T-150/25, G (Retroactivity of a BTI decision): Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 13 May 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof – Austria) – Zollamt Österreich v G GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs Union – Union Customs Code – Right of appeal – Article 44(4) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Decision relating to binding tariff information – Judicial remedy – Correction – Retroactive effect)

cjeu_case ·
1616

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#SWEDISH MATCH – FÓSFOROS DE PORTUGAL, S.A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – General arrangements for products subject to excise duty – Directive 92/12/EEC – Tax markings – Article 21 – National legislation limiting the automatic justification of the destruction of 2% of the tax markings used annually during the production process to the destruction which occurred on the national territory – Proportionality.#Case C-322/25.

cjeu_case ·
1617

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#BRANDL Mezőgazdasági, Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Agrárminisztérium.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law – Cancellation, by operation of law, of rights of usufruct over properties contrary to Article 63 TFEU and Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Restoration of those rights following a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Compensation for the damage suffered – National rules providing for financial compensation calculated solely on the basis of the market value of those properties at the time of deletion of the rights of usufruct – Requirement of adequate compensation for the damage suffered – Loss of profit.#Case C-286/25.

cjeu_case ·
1619

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#KORFIN, s.r.o and SEMPIOLA INVEST LIMITED v SLOVNAFT, a.s.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Company law – Directive 2004/25/EC – Takeover bid – Article 2(1)(a) – Squeeze-out of holders of securities – Offer made by a person controlling the offeree company – Making of the offer following the acquisition of such control – Lack of voluntary nature of the takeover bid.#Case C-225/25.

cjeu_case ·
1620

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#European Commission v Italian Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 5(1) – Obligation for Member States to introduce measures to prevent and penalise the misuse of successive fixed-term employment contracts – Absence of such measures – Concept of ‘objective reasons’ justifying the renewal of such contracts.#Case C-155/25.

cjeu_case ·