Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161316) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43188) directive (8067)
316 885 documents
16121

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024.#VC v European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.#Public procurement – Financial regulation – Exclusion from procurement procedures and from the award of grants financed by the general budget of the European Union and by the EDF for a period of two years – Publication of exclusion – Registration in the early detection and exclusion system database – Grave professional misconduct – Decision of a national competition authority – Suspension by a national court – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Remedial measures – Unlimited jurisdiction – Manifest error of assessment – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-126/23.

cjeu_case ·
16124

Case T-126/23: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – VC v EU-OSHA (Exclusion from procurement procedures based on a suspended national administrative decision) (Public procurement – Financial regulation – Exclusion from procurement procedures and from the award of grants financed by the general budget of the European Union and by the EDF for a period of two years – Publication of exclusion – Registration in the early detection and exclusion system database – Grave professional misconduct – Decision of a national competition authority – Suspension by a national court – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Remedial measures – Unlimited jurisdiction – Manifest error of assessment – Error of assessment – Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
16126

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#ACE-Avocats, ensemble v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Obligation to state reasons – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 47 and 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-828/22.

cjeu_case ·
16127

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#ACE-Avocats, ensemble v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Obligation to state reasons – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 47 and 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-828/22.

cjeu_case ·
16128

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Ordre des avocats à la cour de Paris and Julie Couturier v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Obligation to state reasons – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 7, 47 and 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Independence of lawyers.#Case T-798/22.

cjeu_case ·
16129

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Ordre des avocats à la cour de Paris and Julie Couturier v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Obligation to state reasons – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 7, 47 and 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Independence of lawyers.#Case T-798/22.

cjeu_case ·
16130

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Ordre néerlandais des avocats du barreau de Bruxelles and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 7 and 47 and Article 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Independence of lawyers – Rule of law – Proportionality – Legal certainty.#Case T-797/22.

cjeu_case ·
16131

Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Ordre néerlandais des avocats du barreau de Bruxelles and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 7 and 47 and Article 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Independence of lawyers – Rule of law – Proportionality – Legal certainty.#Case T-797/22.

cjeu_case ·
16132

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#IP v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Termination of the contract without notice – OLAF investigation – Reimbursement of medical expenses – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to implement a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to implement a judgment delivered in an action for annulment – Res judicata – Procedural defect – Article 12 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Consultation of the Disciplinary Board – Rights of the defence – Liability – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-669/22.

cjeu_case ·
16133

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#IP v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Termination of the contract without notice – OLAF investigation – Reimbursement of medical expenses – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to implement a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to implement a judgment delivered in an action for annulment – Res judicata – Procedural defect – Article 12 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Consultation of the Disciplinary Board – Rights of the defence – Liability – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-669/22.

cjeu_case ·
16134

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024.#Silgan Holdings, Inc. and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Metal packaging market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Cooperation between the Commission and the national competition authorities – Initiation of an investigation procedure by the Commission at the request of a national competition authority – Period for re-allocation – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Principle of subsidiarity – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Principle of good administration – Counterclaim for re-evaluation of the amount of the fine following a settlement procedure.#Case T-589/22.

cjeu_case ·
16135

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024.#Silgan Holdings, Inc. and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Metal packaging market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Cooperation between the Commission and the national competition authorities – Initiation of an investigation procedure by the Commission at the request of a national competition authority – Period for re-allocation – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Principle of subsidiarity – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Principle of good administration – Counterclaim for re-evaluation of the amount of the fine following a settlement procedure.#Case T-589/22.

cjeu_case ·
16136

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#Crown Holdings, Inc. and Crown Cork & Seal Deutschland Holdings GmbH v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Metal packaging market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Cooperation between the Commission and the national competition authorities – Initiation of an investigation procedure by the Commission at the request of a national competition authority – Period for re-allocation – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Principle of subsidiarity – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Principle of good administration – Counterclaim for re-evaluation of the amount of the fine following a settlement procedure.#Case T-587/22.

cjeu_case ·
16137

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#Crown Holdings, Inc. and Crown Cork & Seal Deutschland Holdings GmbH v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Metal packaging market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Cooperation between the Commission and the national competition authorities – Initiation of an investigation procedure by the Commission at the request of a national competition authority – Period for re-allocation – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Principle of subsidiarity – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Principle of good administration – Counterclaim for re-evaluation of the amount of the fine following a settlement procedure.#Case T-587/22.

cjeu_case ·
16138

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#PW v European External Action Service.#Civil service – Contract staff – Refusal to reimburse annual travel expenses for dependent children – Article 8(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Act adversely affecting an official – Decision which definitively lays down the position of the administration – Admissibility – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff.#Case T-448/22.

cjeu_case ·
16139

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#PW v European External Action Service.#Civil service – Contract staff – Refusal to reimburse annual travel expenses for dependent children – Article 8(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Act adversely affecting an official – Decision which definitively lays down the position of the administration – Admissibility – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff.#Case T-448/22.

cjeu_case ·
16140

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024.#TotalEnergies Marketing Nederland NV v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU – Refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – General presumption of confidentiality – Obligation to identify the documents covered by the presumption and to provide a list of them.#Case T-332/22.

cjeu_case ·