Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161316) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43188) directive (8067)
316 885 documents
15983

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Somateio 'Elliniko Symvoulio gia tous Prosfyges' and Astiki Mi Kerdoskopiki Etaireia 'Ypostirixi Prosfygon sto Aigaio' v Ypourgos Exoterikon and Ypourgos Metanastefsis kai Asylou.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Granting of international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 38 – Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Concept of ‘safe third country’ – Classification of the Republic of Türkiye as a ‘safe third country’ – Readmission of applicants for international protection in third countries – Refusal.#Case C-134/23.

cjeu_case ·
15984

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Somateio 'Elliniko Symvoulio gia tous Prosfyges' and Astiki Mi Kerdoskopiki Etaireia 'Ypostirixi Prosfygon sto Aigaio' v Ypourgos Exoterikon and Ypourgos Metanastefsis kai Asylou.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Granting of international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 38 – Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Concept of ‘safe third country’ – Classification of the Republic of Türkiye as a ‘safe third country’ – Readmission of applicants for international protection in third countries – Refusal.#Case C-134/23.

cjeu_case ·
15987

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Ferriere Nord SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for concrete reinforcing bars – European Commission Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Decision adopted following the annulment of earlier decisions – Holding of a new hearing attended by the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Requirement of impartiality – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Ne bis in idem principle – Plea of illegality – Aggravating circumstances – Repeated infringement – Mitigating circumstances – Equal treatment.#Case C-31/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
15988

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for concrete reinforcing bars – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Decision adopted following the annulment of earlier decisions – Holding of a new hearing attended by the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Requirement of impartiality – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons.#Joined Cases C-29/23 P and C-30/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
15989

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for concrete reinforcing bars – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Decision adopted following the annulment of earlier decisions – Holding of a new hearing attended by the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Requirement of impartiality – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons.#Joined Cases C-29/23 P and C-30/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
15990

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#ND v DR.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Chapter VIII – Remedies – Medicinal products marketed by a pharmacist on an online platform – Action brought before the national civil courts by a competitor of that pharmacist on the basis of the prohibition of unfair commercial practices for infringement by the pharmacist of the obligations laid down by that regulation – Standing to bring proceedings – Article 4(15) and Article 9(1) and (2) – Directive 95/46/EC – Article 8(1) and (2) – Concept of ‘data concerning health’ – Conditions for the processing of those data.#Case C-21/23.

cjeu_case ·
15991

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#ND v DR.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Chapter VIII – Remedies – Medicinal products marketed by a pharmacist on an online platform – Action brought before the national civil courts by a competitor of that pharmacist on the basis of the prohibition of unfair commercial practices for infringement by the pharmacist of the obligations laid down by that regulation – Standing to bring proceedings – Article 4(15) and Article 9(1) and (2) – Directive 95/46/EC – Article 8(1) and (2) – Concept of ‘data concerning health’ – Conditions for the processing of those data.#Case C-21/23.

cjeu_case ·
15992

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#M.-A.A. v Direcţia de Evidenţă a Persoanelor Cluj and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Articles 20 and 21 TFEU – Articles 7 and 45 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Union citizen who has lawfully acquired, during the exercise of that right and his residence in another Member State, a change of his first name and gender identity – Obligation on the part of that Member State to recognise and enter in the birth certificate that change of first name and gender identity – National legislation which does not permit such recognition and entry, obliging the party concerned to bring new judicial proceedings for a change of gender identity in the Member State of origin – Effect of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union.#Case C-4/23.

cjeu_case ·
15993

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#M.-A.A. v Direcţia de Evidenţă a Persoanelor Cluj and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Sectorului 6 Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Articles 20 and 21 TFEU – Articles 7 and 45 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Union citizen who has lawfully acquired, during the exercise of that right and his residence in another Member State, a change of his first name and gender identity – Obligation on the part of that Member State to recognise and enter in the birth certificate that change of first name and gender identity – National legislation which does not permit such recognition and entry, obliging the party concerned to bring new judicial proceedings for a change of gender identity in the Member State of origin – Effect of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union.#Case C-4/23.

cjeu_case ·
15994

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 4 October 2024.#AK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order in criminal matters – Material scope – Concept of ‘investigative measure’ – Service of an indictment accompanied by an order that the person be remanded in custody pending trial and make a bail payment – Hearing of the accused person.#Case C-583/23.

cjeu_case ·
15995

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 4 October 2024.#SIA 'A' v C and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Scope – Article 2(b) – Article 3(1) – Article 4(2) – Article 5 – Article 6(1) – Article 8a – Pre-formulated standard contract – Contract between a supplier providing services for development and career support for sportspersons and a ‘rising star’ sportsman of minor age represented by his parents – Term establishing the obligation to pay to that supplier remuneration equal to 10% of the income received by that sportsman over the following 15 years – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 17 and 24 – Right to property – Rights of the child.#Case C-365/23.

cjeu_case ·
15996

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 4 October 2024.#Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#References for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Judicial body competent to propose the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against judges, public prosecutors and investigating magistrates, with a view to the imposition of disciplinary penalties – Members of the judicial body remaining in office after the expiry of their term of office – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Data security – Access by a judicial body to data relating to the bank accounts of judges and public prosecutors and of their family members – Judicial authorisation for the purpose of lifting banking secrecy – Court authorising the lifting of banking secrecy – Article 4(7) – Concept of ‘controller’ – Article 51 – Concept of ‘supervisory authority’.#Joined Cases C-313/23, C-316/23 and C-332/23.

cjeu_case ·
15997

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 4 October 2024.#Criminal proceedings against I.R.O. and F.J.L.R.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Central de Instrucción n° 6 de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Article 42(1) – Procedural measures intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties – Judicial review, by national courts, in accordance with the requirements and procedures provided for in national law – Scope – Witness summons – National law not permitting direct judicial review of such a measure – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness.#Case C-292/23.

cjeu_case ·
15998

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 4 October 2024.#European Commission and Others v Carpatair SA.#Appeal – State aid – Aviation sector – Measures implemented by Timişoara International Airport (Romania) in favour of Wizz Air and other airlines using that airport – Decision finding that there is no State aid – Action for annulment – Article 263 TFEU – Admissibility – Condition that the applicant must be directly and individually concerned – Obligation to state reasons – Distortion of the evidence.#Joined Cases C-244/23 P to C-246/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
15999

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 4 October 2024.#European Commission v Republic of Malta.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 20 TFEU – Citizenship of the Union – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – Principle of mutual trust between the Member States – Grant of the nationality of a Member State – Special relationship of solidarity and good faith – Operation of an investor citizenship scheme – Naturalisation in exchange for predetermined payments or investments – Transactional nature of the naturalisation scheme, which amounts to the ‘commercialisation’ of Union citizenship.#Case C-181/23.

cjeu_case ·
16000

Case C-761/23, Komise pro rozhodování ve věcech pobytu cizinců: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 October 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud – Czech Republic) – N.V.N. v Komise pro rozhodování ve věcech pobytu cizinců (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Directive 2011/98/EU – Issuance of a single permit for third-country nationals to reside and work in the territory of a Member State – Principle of equivalence – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Classified information – Access to the file)

cjeu_case ·