Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161316) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43188) directive (8067)
316 885 documents
11443

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 2 April 2025.#Jacob Cohen Company SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-34/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
11444

Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 2 avril 2025.#Jacob Cohen Company SpA contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-34/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
11446

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Paul Hartmann AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark MEDISET – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-429/24.

cjeu_case ·
11447

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Paul Hartmann AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark MEDISET – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-429/24.

cjeu_case ·
11448

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Dmitry Alexandrovich Pumpyanskiy v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(f) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(f) and (g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-272/24.

cjeu_case ·
11449

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Dmitry Alexandrovich Pumpyanskiy v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(f) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(f) and (g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-272/24.

cjeu_case ·
11451

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#SMT GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered community design representing a profile bar (building materials) – Grounds for invalidity – No individual character – No different overall impression – Article 4(1), Article 6(1)(b), and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product to be necessarily reproduced in their exact form and dimensions in order to permit the interconnection with other products – Article 8(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Component part of a complex product – Article 4(2) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-220/24.

cjeu_case ·
11452

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#SMT GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered community design representing a profile bar (building materials) – Grounds for invalidity – No individual character – No different overall impression – Article 4(1), Article 6(1)(b), and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product to be necessarily reproduced in their exact form and dimensions in order to permit the interconnection with other products – Article 8(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Component part of a complex product – Article 4(2) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-220/24.

cjeu_case ·
11453

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Marzena Porczyńska v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark gappol – Earlier EU word mark GAP – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Article 54(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 61(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 57(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Article 56(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 63(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Reimbursement of the costs of representation – Article 109(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-44/24.

cjeu_case ·
11454

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Marzena Porczyńska v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark gappol – Earlier EU word mark GAP – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Article 54(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 61(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 57(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Article 56(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 63(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Reimbursement of the costs of representation – Article 109(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-44/24.

cjeu_case ·
11456

Case T-272/24: Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2025 – Pumpyanskiy v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(f) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(f) and (g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
11457

Case T-221/24: Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2025 – Pumpyanskiy v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of benefit received from a leading businessperson operating in Russia – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
11458

Case T-220/24: Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2025 – SMT v EUIPO – Pies and Rixen (Building materials) (Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered community design representing a profile bar (building materials) – Grounds for invalidity – No individual character – No different overall impression – Article 4(1), Article 6(1)(b), and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Features of appearance of a product to be necessarily reproduced in their exact form and dimensions in order to permit the interconnection with other products – Article 8(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Component part of a complex product – Article 4(2) of Regulation No 6/2002)

cjeu_case ·
11459

Case T-44/24: Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2025 – Porczyńska v EUIPO – Gap (ITM) (gappol) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark gappol – Earlier EU word mark GAP – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Article 54(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 61(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 57(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Article 56(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 63(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Reimbursement of the costs of representation – Article 109(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
11460

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘benefit received from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-1108/23.

cjeu_case ·