Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161316) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43188) directive (8067)
316 885 documents
9761

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#Nio Holding Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark ES8 – Earlier EU word mark S8 – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Articles 15 and 57 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64 of Regulation 2017/1001) – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-593/23.

cjeu_case ·
9762

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#Nio Holding Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark ES8 – Earlier EU word mark S8 – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Articles 15 and 57 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64 of Regulation 2017/1001) – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-593/23.

cjeu_case ·
9765

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#Akgün Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ and Others v European Commission.#Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Definition of Union industry – Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Sampling – Article 17(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Injury to the Union industry – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Causal link – Article 3(6) and (7) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Export price – Adjustment – Functions comparable to those of an agent working on a commission basis – Article 2(10)(i) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Single economic entity – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-231/23.

cjeu_case ·
9766

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#Akgün Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ and Others v European Commission.#Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Definition of Union industry – Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Sampling – Article 17(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Injury to the Union industry – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Causal link – Article 3(6) and (7) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Export price – Adjustment – Functions comparable to those of an agent working on a commission basis – Article 2(10)(i) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Single economic entity – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-231/23.

cjeu_case ·
9767

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#Hitit Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Commission.#Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Constructed normal value – Product control number – Article 2(3), (5) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Comparison between the normal value and the export price – Article 2(10) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Currency conversion – Injury to the Union industry – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Sampling – Article 17(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Manifest error of assessment – Error of law.#Case T-230/23.

cjeu_case ·
9768

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#Hitit Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Commission.#Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Constructed normal value – Product control number – Article 2(3), (5) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Comparison between the normal value and the export price – Article 2(10) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Currency conversion – Injury to the Union industry – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Sampling – Article 17(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Manifest error of assessment – Error of law.#Case T-230/23.

cjeu_case ·
9769

Case T-477/23: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – DZ Bank v SRB (Action for annulment – Economic and monetary policy – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Directive 2014/59/EU – Joint decision on the determination of minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
9770

Case T-1036/23: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Fattorie Garofalo – Società Cooperativa Agricola v EUIPO – Pastificio Lucio Garofalo (fattorie garofalo) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark FATTORIE GAROFALO – Earlier EU figurative mark GAROFALO – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark – No due cause)

cjeu_case ·
9771

Case T-593/23: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Nio v EUIPO – Audi (ES6) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark ES6 – Earlier EU word mark S6 – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Articles 15 and 57 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64 of Regulation 2017/1001) – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
9772

Case T-593/23: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Nio v EUIPO – Audi (ES8) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark ES8 – Earlier EU word mark S8 – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Articles 15 and 57 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64 of Regulation 2017/1001) – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
9774

Case T-231/23: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Akgün Seramik and Others v Commission (Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Definition of Union industry – Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Sampling – Article 17(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Injury to the Union industry – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Causal link – Article 3(6) and (7) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Export price – Adjustment – Functions comparable to those of an agent working on a commission basis – Article 2(10)(i) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Single economic entity – Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
9775

Case T-230/23: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Hitit Seramik v Commission (Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Constructed normal value – Product control number – Article 2(3), (5) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Comparison between the normal value and the export price – Article 2(10) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Currency conversion – Injury to the Union industry – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Sampling – Article 17(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Manifest error of assessment – Error of law)

cjeu_case ·
9776

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 June 2025.#Madre Querida, SL and Others v European Commission.#Common Fisheries Policy – Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2336 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1614 – Methods and criteria for determining areas where vulnerable marine ecosystems are known to occur or are likely to occur – Establishment of a list of areas where the presence of vulnerable marine ecosystems is proven or probable – Establishment of buffer zones – Plea of illegality – Proportionality.#Case T-781/22.

cjeu_case ·
9777

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 June 2025.#Madre Querida, SL and Others v European Commission.#Common Fisheries Policy – Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2336 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1614 – Methods and criteria for determining areas where vulnerable marine ecosystems are known to occur or are likely to occur – Establishment of a list of areas where the presence of vulnerable marine ecosystems is proven or probable – Establishment of buffer zones – Plea of illegality – Proportionality.#Case T-781/22.

cjeu_case ·
9778

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 June 2025.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#Common Fisheries Policy – Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2336 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1614 – Methods and criteria for determining areas where vulnerable marine ecosystems are known to occur or are likely to occur – Establishment of a list of areas where the presence of vulnerable marine ecosystems is proven or probable – Establishment of buffer zones – Plea of illegality – Proportionality.#Case T-681/22.

cjeu_case ·
9779

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 June 2025.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#Common Fisheries Policy – Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2336 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1614 – Methods and criteria for determining areas where vulnerable marine ecosystems are known to occur or are likely to occur – Establishment of a list of areas where the presence of vulnerable marine ecosystems is proven or probable – Establishment of buffer zones – Plea of illegality – Proportionality.#Case T-681/22.

cjeu_case ·
9780

Case T-781/22: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Madre Querida and Others v Commission (Common Fisheries Policy – Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2336 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1614 – Methods and criteria for determining areas where vulnerable marine ecosystems are known to occur or are likely to occur – Establishment of a list of areas where the presence of vulnerable marine ecosystems is proven or probable – Establishment of buffer zones – Plea of illegality – Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·