Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161316) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43188) directive (8067)
316 885 documents
9303

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#FL v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement agencies of the Member States – Alleged unauthorised processing of personal data – Breach of formal requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Absence of non-material harm suffered due to Europol – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-506/24.

cjeu_case ·
9304

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#FL v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement agencies of the Member States – Alleged unauthorised processing of personal data – Breach of formal requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Absence of non-material harm suffered due to Europol – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-506/24.

cjeu_case ·
9305

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#FF v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement agencies of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – No non-material damage suffered as a result of acts of Europol – Action in part brought before a court manifestly lacking jurisdiction to hear and determine it, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-484/24.

cjeu_case ·
9306

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#FF v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement agencies of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – No non-material damage suffered as a result of acts of Europol – Action in part brought before a court manifestly lacking jurisdiction to hear and determine it, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-484/24.

cjeu_case ·
9307

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#CW v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation and European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation between police authorities and other law enforcement services of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with formal requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – No non-material damage suffered as a result of acts of Europol – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-148/24.

cjeu_case ·
9308

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#CW v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation and European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation between police authorities and other law enforcement services of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with formal requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – No non-material damage suffered as a result of acts of Europol – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-148/24.

cjeu_case ·
9309

Case T-506/24: Order of the General Court of 26 June 2025 – FL v Eurojust and Europol (Exclu) (Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement agencies of the Member States – Alleged unauthorised processing of personal data – Breach of formal requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Absence of non-material harm suffered due to Europol – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
9310

Case T-484/24: Order of the General Court of 26 June 2025 – FF v Eurojust and Europol (Sky ECC III) (Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement agencies of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – No non-material damage suffered as a result of acts of Europol – Action in part brought before a court manifestly lacking jurisdiction to hear and determine it, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
9311

Case T-148/24: Order of the General Court of 26 June 2025 – CW v Europol and Eurojust (EncroChat) (Non-contractual liability – Cooperation between police authorities and other law enforcement services of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with formal requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – No non-material damage suffered as a result of acts of Europol – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
9314

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 26 June 2025.#Criminal proceedings v HG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Firenze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order in criminal matters – Article 3 – Material scope – Concept of ‘investigative measure’ – Purpose – Obtaining evidence – Article 10 – Recourse to a different type of investigative measure – Article 11 – Grounds for non-recognition or non-execution – Fundamental rights – Article 22 – Temporary transfer to the issuing State of the person held in custody for the purpose of carrying out an investigative measure – Article 24 – Hearing of the accused person by videoconference – Article 24(2)(b) – Fundamental principles of the law of the executing Member State.#Case C-325/24.

cjeu_case ·
9315

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 26 June 2025.#Opera Laboratori Fiorentini SpA v Ministero della Cultura and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 5k(1)(c) – Prohibition on awarding and continuing the performance of any public contract or concession to or with a natural or legal person, entity or body acting ‘on behalf or at the direction’ of an ‘entity referred to in point (a) or (b) of this paragraph’ – Award of a public contract by the authorities of a Member State to a resident company two of whose three members of its administrative board are Russian nationals and one of those Russian nationals, who is the chair and the chief executive officer of that administrative board, is also sole administrator of the parent company of the company concerned.#Case C-313/24.

cjeu_case ·
9317

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Article 108(3) TFEU – Tax scheme – Corporate tax provisions enabling companies that are tax resident in Spain to amortise the financial goodwill resulting from the acquisition of shareholdings in companies that are tax resident outside that Member State – Decisions of the European Commission classifying those provisions as a State aid scheme and ordering the recovery of the aid, with the exception of aid relating to direct and indirect shareholdings acquired before a certain date set by the Commission in order to protect legitimate expectations – Subsequent Commission decision ordering the recovery of all aid relating to indirect shareholdings – Legal certainty.#Joined Cases C-776/23 P to C-780/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
9318

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Article 108(3) TFEU – Tax scheme – Corporate tax provisions enabling companies that are tax resident in Spain to amortise the financial goodwill resulting from the acquisition of shareholdings in companies that are tax resident outside that Member State – Decisions of the European Commission classifying those provisions as a State aid scheme and ordering the recovery of the aid, with the exception of aid relating to direct and indirect shareholdings acquired before a certain date set by the Commission in order to protect legitimate expectations – Subsequent Commission decision ordering the recovery of all aid relating to indirect shareholdings – Legal certainty.#Joined Cases C-776/23 P to C-780/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
9319

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#PJ Carroll & Company Ltd and Nicoventures Trading Ltd v The Minister for Health and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 7(12) – Article 11(6) – Delegated Directive (EU) 2022/2100 – Validity – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Delegation of power to the European Commission – Novel tobacco products – Heated tobacco products – Power to withdraw exemptions from prohibitions of flavourings and labelling requirements – Substantial change of circumstances.#Case C-759/23.

cjeu_case ·
9320

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#PJ Carroll & Company Ltd and Nicoventures Trading Ltd v The Minister for Health and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 7(12) – Article 11(6) – Delegated Directive (EU) 2022/2100 – Validity – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Delegation of power to the European Commission – Novel tobacco products – Heated tobacco products – Power to withdraw exemptions from prohibitions of flavourings and labelling requirements – Substantial change of circumstances.#Case C-759/23.

cjeu_case ·