Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161301) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43169) directive (8067)
316 851 documents
8881

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 July 2025.#Bouwbenodigdheden Hoogeveen BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark BIENENBEISSER – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark is registered – Role of the Nice classification – Homogeneous category of goods – Air vents – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-144/24.

cjeu_case ·
8884

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative marks representing three Chinese characters – Word mark WANG LAO JI – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Joined Cases T-121/24 to T-127/24 and T-129/24.

cjeu_case ·
8885

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative marks representing three Chinese characters – Word mark WANG LAO JI – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Joined Cases T-121/24 to T-127/24 and T-129/24.

cjeu_case ·
8888

Case T-534/24, Gotek: Judgment of the Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 9 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravni sud u Osijeku – Croatia) – MK v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, Samostalni sektor za drugostupanjski upravni postupak (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 7 – Chargeability of excise duty – Release for consumption – Energy products – Whether excise duty arises – Fictitious supply of excise goods appearing on falsified invoices)

cjeu_case ·
8889

Case T-407/24: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – AirPlus International v EUIPO – Alpian (+a) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – EU figurative mark +a – Earlier EU figurative mark A+ – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
8890

Case T-388/24: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – Makhlouf v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Family membership criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to move and reside in the Member States – Right to family life – Non-contractual liability)

cjeu_case ·
8891

Case T-387/24: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – Makhlouf v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Family membership criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability)

cjeu_case ·
8892

Case T-386/24: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – Mhana v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Family membership criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability)

cjeu_case ·
8893

Case T-347/24: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – Target Brands v EUIPO – Polipol Polstermöbel (Representation of red and white concentric rings) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing three red and white concentric circles – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
8894

Case T-306/24: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – sprd.net v EUIPO (Capital letter I and a red heart on the outside of the back of the neck of an item of clothing) (EU trade mark – Application for an EU position mark comprising a capital letter I and a red heart on the outside of the back of the neck of an item of clothing – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
8895

Case T-305/24: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – sprd.net v EUIPO (Capital letter I and a red heart on a label on the inside of an item of clothing) (EU trade mark – Application for an EU position mark comprising a capital letter I and a red heart on a label on the inside of an item of clothing – Position mark – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
8896

Case T-304/24: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – sprd.net v EUIPO (Capital letter I and a red heart on the left side of the chest of an item of clothing) (EU trade mark – Application for an EU position mark comprising a capital letter I and a red heart on the left side of the chest of an item of clothing – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
8898

Case T-188/24: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin v Commission (Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Administrative procedure – Decision ordering an inspection – Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Subject matter and purpose of the inspection – Obligation to state reasons – Sufficiently serious indicia – Protection of privacy – Judicial review)

cjeu_case ·
8899

Case T-144/24: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – Bouwbenodigdheden Hoogeveen v EUIPO – Pürschel (BIENENBEISSER) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark BIENENBEISSER – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark is registered – Role of the Nice classification – Homogeneous category of goods – Air vents – Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·