Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161301) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43169) directive (8067)
316 851 documents
8801

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#PE, légalement représentée par ses parents v Städteregion Aachen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 3 – Matters covered – Freedom of movement for workers – Article 45 TFEU – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7 – Equal treatment – Social advantages – Disabled minor child of a frontier worker – Integration assistance in the form of school assistance benefits for disabled children – Residence requirement – Proportionality.#Case C-257/24.

cjeu_case ·
8802

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#PE, légalement représentée par ses parents v Städteregion Aachen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 3 – Matters covered – Freedom of movement for workers – Article 45 TFEU – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7 – Equal treatment – Social advantages – Disabled minor child of a frontier worker – Integration assistance in the form of school assistance benefits for disabled children – Residence requirement – Proportionality.#Case C-257/24.

cjeu_case ·
8803

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#G.M.K.-Z.B.M. v S.O.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 66 – Scope ratione temporis – Legal proceedings instituted by a claimant – Issue of an order for payment – Statement of opposition by the defendant to that order for payment seeking a review of the case concerned – Regulation (EU) No 44/2001 – Article 5(3) – Jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Article 6(1) – More than one defendant – Article 22(1) – Exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings which have as their object rights in rem in immovable property or tenancies of immovable property – Action for payment of compensation for the non-contractual use of immovable property situated in a Member State – Defendant domiciled in another Member State.#Case C-99/24.

cjeu_case ·
8804

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#G.M.K.-Z.B.M. v S.O.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Koszalinie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 66 – Scope ratione temporis – Legal proceedings instituted by a claimant – Issue of an order for payment – Statement of opposition by the defendant to that order for payment seeking a review of the case concerned – Regulation (EU) No 44/2001 – Article 5(3) – Jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Article 6(1) – More than one defendant – Article 22(1) – Exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings which have as their object rights in rem in immovable property or tenancies of immovable property – Action for payment of compensation for the non-contractual use of immovable property situated in a Member State – Defendant domiciled in another Member State.#Case C-99/24.

cjeu_case ·
8805

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#DADA Music SRL and Uniunea Producătorilor de Fonograme din România (UPFR) v Asociaţia Radiourilor Locale şi Regionale (ARLR).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Intellectual property – Collective management of copyright and related rights – Directive 2006/115/EEC – Article 8(2) – Broadcasting and communication to the public – Directive 2014/26/EU – Second subparagraph of Article 16(2) – Licensing – Radio broadcasting – Concepts of ‘equitable remuneration’ and ‘appropriate remuneration’ – Criteria for assessing the equitable or appropriate nature – Article 17(2) and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Fundamental right to the protection of intellectual property – Scope and interpretation of rights and principles – National legislation repealing a system of minimum flat-rate remuneration.#Case C-37/24.

cjeu_case ·
8806

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#DADA Music SRL and Uniunea Producătorilor de Fonograme din România (UPFR) v Asociaţia Radiourilor Locale şi Regionale (ARLR).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Intellectual property – Collective management of copyright and related rights – Directive 2006/115/EEC – Article 8(2) – Broadcasting and communication to the public – Directive 2014/26/EU – Second subparagraph of Article 16(2) – Licensing – Radio broadcasting – Concepts of ‘equitable remuneration’ and ‘appropriate remuneration’ – Criteria for assessing the equitable or appropriate nature – Article 17(2) and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Fundamental right to the protection of intellectual property – Scope and interpretation of rights and principles – National legislation repealing a system of minimum flat-rate remuneration.#Case C-37/24.

cjeu_case ·
8810

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 10 July 2025.#Katholische Schwangerschaftsberatung v JB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Occupational activities within churches and other organisations the ethos of which is based on religion or belief – Association providing counselling on pregnancy to pregnant women – Occupational requirements – Acting in good faith and with loyalty to the ethos of the church or organisation – Difference of treatment on grounds of religion or belief – Dismissal of a worker on the ground of her leaving the Catholic church.#Case C-258/24.

cjeu_case ·
8812

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 10 July 2025.#TK and OP v Riksåklagaren.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Single market for financial services – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Market abuse – Insider dealing – Article 7(1)(a) – Concept of ‘inside information’ – Criteria – Public information – Article 17 – Public disclosure of inside information by an issuer – Decision of a contracting authority not to award a public contract to a tenderer – Early sale of shares of that tenderer – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1055 – Article 2 – Means for public disclosure of inside information.#Case C-229/24.

cjeu_case ·
8815

Case C-823/24, Centro Servizi Culturali Santa Chiara: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Trento – Italy) – KP, HG, MC, VM v Centro Servizi Culturali Santa Chiara (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – No less favourable treatment of fixed-term workers – Granting of certain elements of remuneration only to permanent workers – Fixed-term workers receiving higher hourly remuneration than that of permanent workers)

cjeu_case ·
8816

Case C-367/24, Telekom România Mobile Communications: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Romania) – Autoritatea Naţională pentru Administrare şi Reglementare în Comunicaţii v Telekom România Mobile Communications (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications – Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 – Measures concerning open internet access – Article 3(3) – Obligation on providers of internet access services to treat traffic equally and without discrimination, restriction or interference – Possibility, for those providers, to implement reasonable traffic management measures – Tariff option entailing a bandwidth limitation in respect of video streaming)

cjeu_case ·
8817

Case C-365/24, Purefun Group: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen – Sweden) – Purefun Group AB v Doggy AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Free movement of goods – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – Trade name – Company name – National legislation conferring an exclusive right on the proprietor of a company name)

cjeu_case ·
8818

Case C-331/24: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025 – European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – EU action in the field of water policy – Directive 2000/60/EC – Article 13(7) and Article 15(1) – River basin management plans – Second review and second update – Directive 2007/60/EC – Article 14(3) and Article 15(1) – Flood risk management plans – First review and, if necessary, first update – River basin districts ES122 Fuerteventura, ES123 Lanzarote and ES125 La Palma (Spain) – Reporting to the European Commission – No reporting)

cjeu_case ·
8819

Case C-322/24, Sánchez Romero Carvajal Jabugo: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Alicante – Spain) – Sánchez Romero Carvajal Jabugo S.A.U. v Embutidos Monells S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 9(1) – Action for invalidity – Bad faith on the part of the proprietor of the later trade mark when filing the application for registration of that mark – Absolute ground for invalidity – Limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Not enforceable against the proprietor of the earlier mark)

cjeu_case ·
8820

Case C-294/24, Zadzhova: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad – Burgas – Bulgaria) – Vodosnabdyavane i kanalizatsia EAD v ED (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 3(1) – Contract for the provision of water and wastewater services – Date on which the claim becomes due and the starting-point of the limitation period of the claim – Requirement to present the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice – Lack of sufficient details – Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·