Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161301) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43169) directive (8067)
316 851 documents
8785

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#KP and Others v Centro Servizi Culturali Santa Chiara.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – No less favourable treatment of fixed-term workers – Granting of certain elements of remuneration only to permanent workers – Fixed-term workers receiving higher hourly remuneration than that of permanent workers.#Case C-823/24.

cjeu_case ·
8787

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Autoritatea Naţională pentru Administrare şi Reglementare în Comunicaţii v Telekom România Mobile Communications.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications – Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 – Measures concerning open internet access – Article 3(3) – Obligation on providers of internet access services to treat traffic equally and without discrimination, restriction or interference – Possibility, for those providers, to implement reasonable traffic management measures – Tariff option entailing a bandwidth limitation in respect of video streaming.#Case C-367/24.

cjeu_case ·
8788

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Autoritatea Naţională pentru Administrare şi Reglementare în Comunicaţii v Telekom România Mobile Communications.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications – Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 – Measures concerning open internet access – Article 3(3) – Obligation on providers of internet access services to treat traffic equally and without discrimination, restriction or interference – Possibility, for those providers, to implement reasonable traffic management measures – Tariff option entailing a bandwidth limitation in respect of video streaming.#Case C-367/24.

cjeu_case ·
8791

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – EU action in the field of water policy – Directive 2000/60/EC – Article 13(7) and Article 15(1) – River basin management plans – Second review and second update – Directive 2007/60/EC – Article 14(3) and Article 15(1) – Flood risk management plans – First review and, if necessary, first update – River basin districts ES122 Fuerteventura, ES123 Lanzarote and ES125 La Palma (Spain) – Reporting to the European Commission – No reporting.#Case C-331/24.

cjeu_case ·
8792

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – EU action in the field of water policy – Directive 2000/60/EC – Article 13(7) and Article 15(1) – River basin management plans – Second review and second update – Directive 2007/60/EC – Article 14(3) and Article 15(1) – Flood risk management plans – First review and, if necessary, first update – River basin districts ES122 Fuerteventura, ES123 Lanzarote and ES125 La Palma (Spain) – Reporting to the European Commission – No reporting.#Case C-331/24.

cjeu_case ·
8793

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Sánchez Romero Carvajal Jabugo, SAU v Embutidos Monells, SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Directive 2008/95/EC – Paragraph 9(1) – Action for invalidity – Bad faith on the part of the proprietor of the later trade mark when filing the application for registration of that mark – Absolute ground for invalidity – Limitation through acquiescence – Not enforceable against the proprietor of the earlier mark.#Case C-322/24.

cjeu_case ·
8794

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Sánchez Romero Carvajal Jabugo, SAU v Embutidos Monells, SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Alicante.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Directive 2008/95/EC – Paragraph 9(1) – Action for invalidity – Bad faith on the part of the proprietor of the later trade mark when filing the application for registration of that mark – Absolute ground for invalidity – Limitation through acquiescence – Not enforceable against the proprietor of the earlier mark.#Case C-322/24.

cjeu_case ·
8795

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#„Vodosnabdyavane i kanalizatsia“ EAD v ED.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 3(1) – Contract for the provision of water and wastewater services – Date on which the claim becomes due and the starting-point of the limitation period of the claim – Requirement to present the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice – Lack of sufficient details – Inadmissibility.#Case C-294/24.

cjeu_case ·
8796

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#„Vodosnabdyavane i kanalizatsia“ EAD v ED.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad - Burgas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 3(1) – Contract for the provision of water and wastewater services – Date on which the claim becomes due and the starting-point of the limitation period of the claim – Requirement to present the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice – Lack of sufficient details – Inadmissibility.#Case C-294/24.

cjeu_case ·
8797

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Ligue royale belge pour la protection des oiseaux ASBL v Région wallonne.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Practices beneficial for the climate and the environment – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/484 – Validity – Obligation to state reasons – Invasion of Ukraine by Russia – Increase in the agricultural production potential of the European Union – Derogation from certain conditions relating to the direct greening payment – Land lying fallow considered as a distinct crop and ecological focus area even if it has been grazed, harvested for production purposes or cultivated – Necessary and justifiable nature of the measures adopted.#Case C-287/24.

cjeu_case ·
8798

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Ligue royale belge pour la protection des oiseaux ASBL v Région wallonne.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Practices beneficial for the climate and the environment – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/484 – Validity – Obligation to state reasons – Invasion of Ukraine by Russia – Increase in the agricultural production potential of the European Union – Derogation from certain conditions relating to the direct greening payment – Land lying fallow considered as a distinct crop and ecological focus area even if it has been grazed, harvested for production purposes or cultivated – Necessary and justifiable nature of the measures adopted.#Case C-287/24.

cjeu_case ·
8799

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#KONREO, v. o. s., en qualité d’administrateur judiciaire de la société débitrice FAU s.r.o. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 205 – Joint and several liability – Conditions and scope of liability – Combating VAT evasion – VAT not paid by the supplier – Refusal to grant the right to deduct VAT to the recipient of the supply – Possibility of holding the recipient of the supply jointly and severally liable for payment of VAT due from the supplier – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-276/24.

cjeu_case ·
8800

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#KONREO, v. o. s., en qualité d’administrateur judiciaire de la société débitrice FAU s.r.o. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 205 – Joint and several liability – Conditions and scope of liability – Combating VAT evasion – VAT not paid by the supplier – Refusal to grant the right to deduct VAT to the recipient of the supply – Possibility of holding the recipient of the supply jointly and severally liable for payment of VAT due from the supplier – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-276/24.

cjeu_case ·