Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161301) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43169) directive (8067)
316 851 documents
8261

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1)(a) and (d) – Inclusion of the appellant’s name due to his support for the actions or policies of the Russian Federation against Ukraine and to the material or financial support provided to Russian decision-makers – Effect of the appellant’s failure to distance himself and of his passive attitude.#Case C-702/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
8262

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 1er août 2025.#CM et DS contre Volkswagen AG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations – Réception des véhicules à moteur – Directive 2007/46/CE – Article 18, paragraphe 1 – Article 26, paragraphe 1 – Article 46 – Règlement (CE) no 715/2007 – Article 5, paragraphe 2 – Véhicules à moteur – Moteur diesel – Émissions de polluants – Réduction des émissions d’oxyde d’azote (NOx) limitée par une “fenêtre de températures” – Dispositif d’invalidation – Protection des intérêts d’un acheteur individuel d’un véhicule équipé d’un dispositif d’invalidation illicite – Installation de ce dispositif après la mise en service du véhicule – Droit à réparation au titre de la responsabilité délictuelle du constructeur de ce véhicule – Cause d’exonération – Erreur insurmontable du constructeur quant à l’illicéité du dispositif d’invalidation – Principe d’effectivité – Réparation adéquate du dommage – Mode de calcul de la réparation – Fourchette d’indemnisation.#Affaire C-666/23.

cjeu_case ·
8263

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#CM and DS v Volkswagen AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Approval of motor vehicles – Directive 2007/46/EC – Article 18(1) – Article 26(1) – Article 46 – Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 – Article 5(2) – Motor vehicles – Diesel engine – Pollutant emissions – Reduction in nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions limited by a ‘temperature window’ – Defeat device – Protection of the interests of an individual purchaser of a vehicle equipped with an unlawful defeat device – Installation of that device after the vehicle’s entry into service – Right to compensation from the vehicle manufacturer on the basis of tortious liability – Ground for exemption – Unavoidable error on the part of the manufacturer as regards the unlawfulness of the defeat device – Principle of effectiveness – Adequate compensation for the loss or damage – Method of calculating compensation – Compensation bracket.#Case C-666/23.

cjeu_case ·
8264

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#IL v Veracash SAS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment services in the internal market – Directive 2007/64/EC – Article 56(1)(b) – Obligation for the payment service user to notify the payment service provider ‘without undue delay’ of the loss, theft, misappropriation or unauthorised use of his or her payment instrument – Article 58 – Notification of unauthorised payment transactions – Rectification of such a transaction by the payment service provider subject to the obligation for the user of those services to notify that transaction ‘without undue delay … and no later than 13 months after the debit date’ – Articles 60 and 61 – Respective liabilities of the payment service provider and of the payer for unauthorised payment transactions – Successive unauthorised payment transactions resulting from the loss, theft, misappropriation or unauthorised use of a payment instrument – Delayed notification without intent or gross negligence – Scope of the right to a refund.#Case C-665/23.

cjeu_case ·
8265

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#IL v Veracash SAS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment services in the internal market – Directive 2007/64/EC – Article 56(1)(b) – Obligation for the payment service user to notify the payment service provider ‘without undue delay’ of the loss, theft, misappropriation or unauthorised use of his or her payment instrument – Article 58 – Notification of unauthorised payment transactions – Rectification of such a transaction by the payment service provider subject to the obligation for the user of those services to notify that transaction ‘without undue delay … and no later than 13 months after the debit date’ – Articles 60 and 61 – Respective liabilities of the payment service provider and of the payer for unauthorised payment transactions – Successive unauthorised payment transactions resulting from the loss, theft, misappropriation or unauthorised use of a payment instrument – Delayed notification without intent or gross negligence – Scope of the right to a refund.#Case C-665/23.

cjeu_case ·
8266

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#W and X v Belgische Staat and État belge, représenté par la Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration.#References for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Immigration policy – Directive 2008/115/EC – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 3(4) and (6), Article 7(1) and (4), Article 8(1) and (2), Article 11(1) and Article 13 – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Return decision – Decision not to grant a period for voluntary departure – Entry ban – Actionable administrative act – Enforceability of a return decision not containing a provision relating to the period for voluntary departure – Right to an effective remedy – Entry ban decision adopted after a considerable period of time.#Joined Cases C-636/23 and C-637/23.

cjeu_case ·
8267

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#W and X v Belgische Staat and État belge, représenté par la Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen and Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers.#References for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Immigration policy – Directive 2008/115/EC – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 3(4) and (6), Article 7(1) and (4), Article 8(1) and (2), Article 11(1) and Article 13 – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Return decision – Decision not to grant a period for voluntary departure – Entry ban – Actionable administrative act – Enforceability of a return decision not containing a provision relating to the period for voluntary departure – Right to an effective remedy – Entry ban decision adopted after a considerable period of time.#Joined Cases C-636/23 and C-637/23.

cjeu_case ·
8268

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Royal Football Club Seraing v Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 19(1) TEU – Obligation of Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Possibility of recourse to arbitration – Arbitration between individuals – Imposed arbitration – Decision of a body of an international sports federation imposing a sanction – Award by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) upheld by a decision of a court of a third State – Legal remedy against the arbitral award – National legislation conferring on that arbitral award the authority of res judicata between the parties and probative value vis-à-vis third parties – Powers and obligations of the national courts before which that arbitral award is relied on – Effective review of the consistency of such an arbitral award with the principles and provisions falling under EU public policy.#Case C-600/23.

cjeu_case ·
8269

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Royal Football Club Seraing v Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 19(1) TEU – Obligation of Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Possibility of recourse to arbitration – Arbitration between individuals – Imposed arbitration – Decision of a body of an international sports federation imposing a sanction – Award by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) upheld by a decision of a court of a third State – Legal remedy against the arbitral award – National legislation conferring on that arbitral award the authority of res judicata between the parties and probative value vis-à-vis third parties – Powers and obligations of the national courts before which that arbitral award is relied on – Effective review of the consistency of such an arbitral award with the principles and provisions falling under EU public policy.#Case C-600/23.

cjeu_case ·
8270

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#T.T. and BAJI Trans, s.r. o. v Národný inšpektorát práce.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EU) No 165/2014 – Obligation periodically to inspect tachographs – Exemption – Last sentence of Article 49(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 51(1) thereof – Principle lex posterior mitius – Administrative penalties of a criminal nature – Appeal in cassation – New law having entered into force after the ruling which is the subject of that appeal – Concept of ‘final conviction’.#Case C-544/23.

cjeu_case ·
8271

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#T.T. and BAJI Trans, s.r. o. v Národný inšpektorát práce.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EU) No 165/2014 – Obligation periodically to inspect tachographs – Exemption – Last sentence of Article 49(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 51(1) thereof – Principle lex posterior mitius – Administrative penalties of a criminal nature – Appeal in cassation – New law having entered into force after the ruling which is the subject of that appeal – Concept of ‘final conviction’.#Case C-544/23.

cjeu_case ·
8272

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Tiberis Holding Srl v Gestore dei servizi energetici (GSE) SpA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources – Directive 2009/28/EC – Article 3 – Directive (EU) 2018/2001 – Article 4 – National incentives for the production of energy from renewable sources – Aid scheme – State aid – Article 108 TFEU – Exclusive competence of the European Commission to rule on the compatibility of aid measures with the internal market – Commission decision finding such an aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Action brought before a national court by a beneficiary of aid under that scheme challenging a modality of that scheme which is inextricably linked to its functioning – Inadmissibility, in the context of that action, of a request for a preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of those provisions of those directives.#Case C-514/23.

cjeu_case ·
8273

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Tiberis Holding Srl v Gestore dei servizi energetici (GSE) SpA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources – Directive 2009/28/EC – Article 3 – Directive (EU) 2018/2001 – Article 4 – National incentives for the production of energy from renewable sources – Aid scheme – State aid – Article 108 TFEU – Exclusive competence of the European Commission to rule on the compatibility of aid measures with the internal market – Commission decision finding such an aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Action brought before a national court by a beneficiary of aid under that scheme challenging a modality of that scheme which is inextricably linked to its functioning – Inadmissibility, in the context of that action, of a request for a preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of those provisions of those directives.#Case C-514/23.

cjeu_case ·
8274

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Határ Diszkont Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 1(2), Article 2(1)(c) and Article 78 – Exemptions on exportation – Article 146(1)(b) – Exempt supply of goods – Service for the administration of VAT refunds to customers not resident in the European Union – Single supply – Distinct and independent supplies – Principal or ancillary supply – Exemptions under Article 135(1)(d) and Article 146(1)(e) – Protection of legitimate expectations – Taxable amount.#Case C-427/23.

cjeu_case ·
8275

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Határ Diszkont Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 1(2), Article 2(1)(c) and Article 78 – Exemptions on exportation – Article 146(1)(b) – Exempt supply of goods – Service for the administration of VAT refunds to customers not resident in the European Union – Single supply – Distinct and independent supplies – Principal or ancillary supply – Exemptions under Article 135(1)(d) and Article 146(1)(e) – Protection of legitimate expectations – Taxable amount.#Case C-427/23.

cjeu_case ·
8276

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#T.B. and Others v T. S.A. and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection in areas covered by EU law – Article 19(1), second subparagraph, TEU – Principles of the irremovability and independence of judges – Unconsented appointment of a judge of a supreme court to sit, for a fixed term, in another chamber of that court – Primacy of EU law – Public procurement – Directive 2004/17/EC – Public procurement procedures – Application to an agreement transferring ownership rights relating to green electricity certificates – Directive 92/13/EEC – Article 2d(1) – Review procedures in public procurement – Contract having no legal effect – Contracting entity seeking the annulment of a contract concluded in breach of public procurement rules – Abuse of rights – None.#Joined Cases C-422/23, C-455/23, C-459/23 and C-486/23.

cjeu_case ·
8277

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#T.B. and Others v T. S.A. and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#References for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection in areas covered by EU law – Article 19(1), second subparagraph, TEU – Principles of the irremovability and independence of judges – Unconsented appointment of a judge of a supreme court to sit, for a fixed term, in another chamber of that court – Primacy of EU law – Public procurement – Directive 2004/17/EC – Public procurement procedures – Application to an agreement transferring ownership rights relating to green electricity certificates – Directive 92/13/EEC – Article 2d(1) – Review procedures in public procurement – Contract having no legal effect – Contracting entity seeking the annulment of a contract concluded in breach of public procurement rules – Abuse of rights – None.#Joined Cases C-422/23, C-455/23, C-459/23 and C-486/23.

cjeu_case ·
8278

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#FL v Jobcenter Arbeitplus Bielefeld.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Free movement of persons – Article 18 TFEU – Prohibition of discrimination based on nationality – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 24 – Principle of equal treatment – Minor child who is a Union citizen with a right of residence under that directive – Grant of a national residence permit to the parent of that child so that the parent can exercise parental authority over that child – Distinction based on the nationality of the child – Parent with a right of residence as a job-seeker – Derogation from the principle of equal treatment as regards entitlement to social assistance – Scope.#Case C-397/23.

cjeu_case ·
8279

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#FL v Jobcenter Arbeitplus Bielefeld.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sozialgericht Detmold.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Free movement of persons – Article 18 TFEU – Prohibition of discrimination based on nationality – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 24 – Principle of equal treatment – Minor child who is a Union citizen with a right of residence under that directive – Grant of a national residence permit to the parent of that child so that the parent can exercise parental authority over that child – Distinction based on the nationality of the child – Parent with a right of residence as a job-seeker – Derogation from the principle of equal treatment as regards entitlement to social assistance – Scope.#Case C-397/23.

cjeu_case ·